The (Entertaining) Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer

Whether tragedy or farce, Burt Prelutsky has thoroughly enjoyed the morality tale of the NY governor's downfall.

March 16, 2008 - by Burt Prelutsky

Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers

One man’s tragedy is another man’s farce. But, then, I always thought that W. Somerset’s Maugham’s Rain would have played far better as a comedy than as an overwrought melodrama. I am referring, of course, to the plight of Eliot Spitzer. Boy, talk about buyer’s remorse!

Frankly, I was delighted to read about the governor’s recent downfall, and not because he’s a prominent liberal. Okay, have it your way — not just because he’s a prominent liberal. It’s because he’s a big phony and also because he built his own reputation by gleefully bringing down people who did very much the same thing he did.

Because Spitzer is extremely wealthy and because he was the editor of the Harvard Law Review, he felt himself impervious to criticism, let alone cataclysm. Think of him as God with a comb-over.

Even those who supported his political aspirations knew him to be a totally arrogant human being. I even suspect that part of the prostitution ring’s appeal to him was its pompous name, Emperors Club VIP. One wonders if Spitzer wrote off the thousands of dollars he spent canoodling with the hired help, by identifying them as (monkey) business expenses or, better yet, as club dues.

For all of his 48 years on this earth, everything had come pretty easy for the guy. But instead of being grateful for his good fortune, one only had to look at him, cold-eyed and glowering from one dais or another, a face like a clenched fist, to know he felt he was entitled. Some people would say that it’s not fair to judge someone by his looks. But I say there’s a difference between judging someone by the shape of his nose or the color of his eyes and judging him by the look he chooses to present to the world at large. Spitzer always looked like he was posing for a statue. All that was ever missing was the horse and the raised sword.

Time magazine once named Spitzer “Crusader of the Year” and, just last year, this self-righteous ninny convinced 69% of New York voters to elect him governor. But, alas, Time is the rag that continues to name various despots Man of the Year when they mean Newsmaker or even Nuisance of the Year, and New York is the place that thinks nothing of electing the likes of Charles Schumer and Hillary Clinton to the U.S. Senate.

Some people feel sorry for Silda Spitzer, the man’s wife. Well, there’s no denying it makes one’s skin crawl when you see these political wives dragged out time and again during these endless mea culpa occasions, but why would anyone marry this cold fish except for his money and the possibility of some day getting to be the First Lady? Frankly, I am cynical enough to agree with those women who think that the wife isn’t nearly the last to know that she’s married to a philandering husband. And with someone like Spitzer, who’d been VIP client #9 for several years, I think it highly unlikely that Silda was the female equivalent of Rip Van Winkle. Like the wives of many rich and influential men, I suspect she carefully weighed the pros and cons, and decided that, on balance, she liked her life even if she didn’t particularly care for her husband.

Of course I have sympathy for their three daughters. Not only did their father embarrass them for no good reason, but the way he tossed money around on his bimbos had to seriously deplete their eventual inheritance.

The part that continues to confound me is how stupid politicians are, whether they’re Democrats like Spitzer and William (”Money on Ice”) Jefferson or Republicans like Larry (”Twitchy Toes”) Craig and Randy (”If my nickname’s Duke, I ought to be able to live like one”) Cunningham. No matter if their scandals involve sex or money, weren’t any of them awake when Gary Hart saw his presidential hopes vaporize overnight simply because he couldn’t keep his pants zipped up even long enough to reach the Oval Office? And let us not forget Ted Kennedy, who watched his own presidential dreams sink right along with his mom’s ‘67 Olds and Mary Jo Kopechne.

I realize that politicians have enormous egos and a lot of time on their hands, and that successful politicians will always be surrounded by political groupies eager to tell them how wonderful and sexy they are. But how can they continue to be so oblivious to the fact that so long as we have a two party system, the opposition is always going to be gunning for them? And as for reporters, no matter how partisan they may be, they’d trample over their own grandmothers in order to get a scoop on a sex scandal. Even in the case of super liberal Spitzer, it was the New York Times, the paper that hitherto would have had us believe he walked on water, that broke the story.

Unfortunately, the damage wreaked by Spitzer has only just begun. On top of everything else, I think it’s safe to assume that Ashley Dupre, the petite $2,000-an-hour hooker better known as Kristen, will soon be all over the tube, telling all to Diane Sawyer and Larry King, and be making book deals and Viagra commercials, and eventually hosting her very own TV talk show.

Still, there are important lessons to be learned from the rise and fall of Eliot Spitzer. But knowing politicians as I do, the only one they’re likely to come away with is to never again use a phone to hire a prostitute, as it, too, might turn out to be a party line.

Ah, well, we might as well take the philosophical approach, for when all is said and done, New York has a new governor, and producer Dick Wolf has a new episode of Law & Order just waiting to be written.

Television writer Burt Prelutsky is the author of Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco (101 Reasons Why I’m Happy I Left the Left).

Comment DiggDigg This Delicious del.icio.us Digg Print Digg PJM Home

9 Comments

JamesT:

Two THOUSAND dollars an hour??!!??
I guess small talk and foreplay was out.

Mar 16, 2008 - 5:17 am william jonas:

The short answer is arrogance and pride are sins. And sin leads to destruction. This man thought himself to be special and capable of deceiving others to his benefit. At least thats what the devil whispered in his ear when he tempted him. It is an old, old scenario and Man cannot resist the power of Satan himself.
So now Mr.Spitzer must live with the consequences of his sin. The only hope for his redemption is repentance; but in these times when morality is elastic Mr. Spitzer may have difficulty getting on that path.

Mar 16, 2008 - 6:50 am DixieKraut:

Good job. I have read too many of the “there but for the grace of God” articles on that sanctimonious arrogant blowhard. His rough shod tactics and willingness to sully the name of those who opposed him gave more than a hint to his character; or lack thereof. What is really irritating is that the press seems eager now to point out how his past actions were a clue to character. Where was this analysis when he was running for governor? As they say, we get the government we deserve and New York deserved him. Perhaps it will serve as a wake up call and they will stop mindlessly pulling the lever for whatever Democrat or incumbent is running. Probably not. The state is run by the good old boys and they like Eliot are deeply in debt to the teachers unions, state employees and others on the state dole. It is a train wreck waiting to happen and Eliot was just a symptom of problem.
Couldn’t agree more on the “aggrieved” spouse issue also. She either is cut from the same cloth or willingly overlooked his foibles because it suited her own purposes. neither option is conducive to pity.

Mar 16, 2008 - 7:43 am Angry African:

I agree - the wives aren’t always the last to know. But it doesn’t mean that it makes him less guilty of breaking both party and family (un)written rules. Would it have been different if he was in France? Not sure - even there paying for sex is seen as a no-no for politicians. But I gave it a shot in my blog. http://angryafrican.net/2008/03/10/if-only-spitzer-was-french/

Mar 16, 2008 - 8:38 am William:

It is time to remember men and women who stood on a foundation of sound ideas and who did not pander and deceive. It is time to celebrate men and women who will give up everything for freedom. It is time NOT to accept the premise that a tragedy has occurred when a celebrated unprincipled tyrant falls.
But it is nice that we have the name Spitzer to use instead of tyrant all the time. Great article!!!

Mar 16, 2008 - 8:50 am RHM:

Spitzer is an absolute ass. But its the wives of these guys that really baffle me. Why would you put yourself and your daughters through any more public humiliation? Serial offenders are not worthy of forgiveness (http://thecandidacy.com/2008/03/13/elliot-spitzer-is-an-ass/)

Mar 16, 2008 - 9:37 am David Thomson:

“Because Spitzer is extremely wealthy”

No, he is not. Eliot Spitzer’s father is the one with the five hundred million dollars. The son is worth far less—and that is why more serious questions must be asked concerning the reported eighty thousand dollars he spent on prostitutes. Where did he get this money?

Left-wingers often believe that they are above the laws and mores of the common folk. After all, are they not also self sacrificing altruists unlike those rapacious capitalists? The original Mayor Richard Daily was one of the most corrupt politicians in American history. And yet, he attended church services virtually everyday of his life. He apparently had no problem rationalizing away his behavior. Spitzer is simply another one of a long list of Democratic Party politicians who behave in this manner.

Mar 16, 2008 - 11:37 am tehag:

Why does everyone believe Silda had little or nothiing to do with this? Perhaps she hasn’t had sex with Elliot in years; and when she did, perhaps only to have a child. Perhaps she suggested to Eliot that he enjoy the company of others because she didn’t like him (or like sex). Have any of the other hookers come forth to confirm they weren’t there for Silda, too? Why assume the Spitzers are modest and bourgeois in their morality? Aren’t they from the Ivy League where ‘naked days’ and sex clubs are common?

Mar 17, 2008 - 5:30 am JD:

I just wish this schmuck had listened to his wife and tried to fight to remain in power. We could have really been entertained by that show coupled with the Wright situation. Now the new governor proudly declares that he and his wife have screwed around on each other for years.

It’s like these pols are vying to be the first to announce: “Yeah, I enjoy masturbating in public-so what!!!”

Mar 18, 2008 - 5:04 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
remember personal info?
Comments: