The McGreevey Scandal Wasn’t (Just) About Sex
Ménage à trois aside, it was corruption -- not homosexuality -- that brought down the former NJ Governor.
New Jersey has long been the bastard cousin of its neighbor to the north, and the details of the affair involving former Governor Jim McGreevey, his ex-wife Dina Matos and campaign aide Theodore Pederson are the bridge-and-tunnel equivalent of political scandal.
Apparently outraged at Matos’s attempt, via a New York Times op-ed piece, to place herself alongside Silda Wall Spitzer as a fellow cuckolded political wife, Pederson spilled the dirty beans to the Newark Star-Ledger in an article posted online late Sunday evening.
The strapping Rutgers grad was not just any member of McGreevey’s staff; it appears that he had a — as he put it — more “intense” role than any other young man in the harem that constituted the gay guv’s inner circle, due largely to the fact that he participated in “hard-core consensual sex org[ies]” with the then-gubernatorial candidate and his wife. The ménage a trois was not the stuff of Y Tu Mamá También; this is New Jersey after all. According to Pederson, the threesome’s romantic trysts began with a “couple of drinks” at that legendary romantic rendezvous, T.G.I. Fridays. McGreevey backs the assertions of his former aide. Matos — who has banked her divorce case on the claim that she did not know her husband was gay until an hour before he announced it to the world — denies it.
Say what you will about Eliot Spitzer, at least his fall from grace involved $5,000-an-hour prostitutes and the Mayflower hotel. McGreevey, class act that he is, held sleepovers with his wife and college-aged staffer at the Trump Plaza in Atlantic City. “I’d sometimes go up, sit on the edge of the bed, rub Dina’s legs through the comforter and go from there,” Pederson told the New York Post. Thank God It’s Friday.
Ever since he announced, in that infamous press conference, that he was a “gay American,” actual gay Americans have had conflicting opinions about Jim McGreevey. We can’t seem to decide whether to ridicule him as the corrupt hack that he is or welcome him with open arms into gaydom. The latter impulse is an understandable one, given the paucity of openly gay people in public affairs. Indeed, the eagerness of so many gays to champion the Governor of the Garden State as a member of the club exemplified the great strides gays still have to make in the political realm.
As one of the 8 people who read McGreevey’s tortuous memoir, %%AMAZON=The Confession,%% I can safely presume to speak with some authority about this man’s remarkable capacity for self-pity and aggrandizement. Only on page 323 (and over 2 years after his resignation) does McGreevey finally admit that, “hiring a lover on state payroll, no matter what his gender or qualifications, was wrong.” No doubt the world is unfair to gay people and the higher rates of suicide, depression and personally destructive behavior amongst gay men finds some proximate cause in societal homophobia. But Jim McGreevey was forced to resign for no other reason than that he was a corrupt politician. He’s more Mark Foley than Harvey Milk. That he was sleeping with a male aide is incidental to his downfall. By conflating his political demise and his struggle to cope with homosexuality, McGreevey inadvertently hurt the cause of gay civil rights as much as any crusading, socially conservative political activist could have hoped to do. He fed the stereotype that gays are untrustworthy and self-absorbed, and that homosexuality is a personal weakness.
One gets the sense that the McGreeveys’ long, drawn-out divorce proceedings (which have now lasted longer than their marriage) is the couple’s sick attempt to keep their names in the papers (Matos, remember, published her own memoir, Silent Partner, last year, and told ABC News that McGreevey “enlisted” Pedersone, one his “cronies,” to make the threesome accusations because McGreevey “cannot stand it when I am receiving attention in the media rather than him.”) In a poll released by Monmouth University just a few weeks before The Confession hit bookstores, 77% of New Jersey residents said that they believed McGreevey resigned due to “his personal sexuality.” It seemed that McGreevey’s mission had been accomplished: he convinced the voters that it was his homosexuality, not corrupt behavior, which led to his ouster. The prurient disclosures of Theodore Pederson only fortify this harmful, and mistaken, impression.
James Kirchick is an assistant editor of The New Republic and a frequent contributor to The Advocate.
![]() |
![]() |
Podcasts | PJM Home |





PJM Home


Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
7 Comments
1. RE:Sorry, I’m not buying it for a minute. Homosexuality was central to McGreevey’s downfall – it was his driving force.
His inability to control his homosexual impulses were the root cause of his character failures and willingness to violate the public trust. Giving patronage jobs to his sexual partners is an entirely different level of depravity than Spitzer’s hookups. More than just meeting his personal sexual ‘need’, McGreevy corrupted both the office of Governor (with his hiring practices) and the sanctity of marriage (with his menage-a-trois) .
Mar 20, 2008 - 3:51 am 2. BooHoo:“No doubt the world is unfair to gay people and the higher rates of suicide, depression and personally destructive behavior amongst gay men finds some proximate cause in societal homophobia.”
In other words, “Waah! Gay people are victims too! Everybody hates gay people!”
I don’t agree with that lifestyle, and I don’t want it preached to me or my kids, but I don’t hate gay people. Mr. Kirchick doesn’t stop to think that these things are suffered because gay people know they are wrong. For people who believe in Darwinism, they have some serious cognitive dissonance. Darwin tells them they are wrong, but they still champion their cause as something “natural”. If it were natural, gay people could procreate. Hello!
The real reason for this “gay pain” is that they know what they are doing is morally wrong. Yep, morally wrong. They feel guilty about it, but they have put so much into keeping up this lifestyle that damaging themselves is the only way they can act out.
And now a Democrat politician has used this gay victimitis to get out of a sticky spot. He knows Republicans won’t pick on gay people, and Democrats worship them. Just desserts.
Mar 20, 2008 - 6:56 am 3. Anthony:Lack of control is what’s at issue–in this case, lust–and it isn’t unique to homosexuals. If homosexuality were synonymous with lust, we would have no accidental pregnancies anywhere in the world.
And I don’t see why lack of control should be any more of a problem for homosexuals than for heterosexuals. If restraint matters–and it does–then it matters to all of us. If society won’t encourage restraint, then all of us suffer.
I have no problem with this whatsoever. McGreevey is a corrupt hack who should be ridiculed for hiding under the doubtful term “gay American” for his irresponsible behavior and lack of control in public office.
Mar 20, 2008 - 9:37 am 4. Banjo:“He fed the stereotype that gays are untrustworthy and self-absorbed, and that homosexuality is a personal weakness.”
Despite their bad press, stereotypes are pretty much true.
Mar 20, 2008 - 11:39 am 5. James:BooHoo:
I fear you don’t understand natural selection. Sickle-cell anemia persists because the more frequent heterozygotes are better off on the whole where malaria is common; that is, there’s a reproductive advantage for the _species_ as a whole, even though recessive homozygotes get a very raw deal indeed. I’m not asserting that homosexuality is necessarily analogous, but sickle-cell anemia shows that your (commonly seen) attempt at a quick disproof that homosexuality is inherited is invalid.
Mar 20, 2008 - 12:43 pm 6. Elroy Jetson:McGreevey is worse than the dog that climbs on your leg for a “ride”. That’s why should be an insult to gay Americans everywhere that he considers himself one.
Mar 20, 2008 - 1:43 pm 7. Lily S.:Great Post!
Apr 4, 2008 - 10:46 pmLily S.
http://www.myspace.com/zriiforlife