America’s Fickle ‘Old Europe’ Allies

The recent NATO summit in Romania showed why there's trouble ahead for transatlantic relations — no matter who occupies the White House next January.

April 14, 2008 - by Soeren Kern

Europeans have been hyperventilating over their self-perceived “victories” vis-à-vis the United States at the recent NATO Summit in Romania from April 2-4. “France and Germany Thwart Bush’s Plans,” ran a triumphant headline in the Hamburg-based Der Spiegel. “Europe Waits Out the Bush Administration,” read another. “Only One Lame Duck Here” said the London-based Guardian in commentary that waxes giddy about Russia’s growing stranglehold over Europe. “NATO Should Disappear” said the Madrid-based El Pais.

But behind the spin, the 26-member NATO Summit (arguably the most important such gathering since the end of the Cold War) exposed a security-dependent Europe that is divided, weak, and fickle above all else.

Consider Spain, for example, where newly re-elected Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero was far less concerned about Spanish (or European) security than about getting some one-on-one face-time with US President George W Bush. Zapatero, a self-proclaimed feminist pacifist who is arguably the most anti-American leader in Europe today, is (unsurprisingly) one of the only such Europeans never to have been invited to the White House.

But in the Byzantine logic of Spanish politics, that elusive visit to the Oval Office (to see an American president who is broadly despised by most Spaniards) also happens to be the main litmus test by which Spaniards will judge whether Zapatero gets promoted from provincial politician to international “statesman” during his second term.

Thus Zapatero’s permanent non-relationship with the most powerful leader in the free world has become something of a media obsession in Spain, with the issue generating many miles of ink in national newspapers.

Imagine, then, the internecine recriminations when Zapatero’s much-vaunted “mini-summit” with Bush lasted all of about three seconds…just enough for Bush to shout three words (which brings to a grand total of 18 words the two leaders have exchanged during the last four years) that appeared in newspaper headlines all across Spain: “Hola, Hola, Felicidades.” (”Hello, Hello, Congratulations,” referring to Zapatero’s re-election.)

Zapatero then took to the podium and tried to persuade bemused members of the Alliance… to merge NATO with the United Nations! And, just for good measure, the prime minister also announced that Spain would not be sending more troops to Afghanistan, with or without the UN.

Not surprising, then, that Zapatero was captured in a politically devastating Summit photograph sitting in isolation, while the rest of the leaders present were huddled around Bush at the other end of the conference hall. The picture, which made the front page of every newspaper in Spain, opened up yet another pained debate about Spain’s declining influence in the world since Zapatero took office.

Then take Greece. It refused to allow Macedonia to join NATO because Greece wants its northern neighbor to change its name, which Greeks say jeopardizes their claim as the only the rightful descendants of Alexander the Great (356-323 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC).

The controversy erupted in 1991, when the former Yugoslav republic declared its independence from Belgrade and took the name Republic of Macedonia. Although more than 120 countries have now recognized the Republic of Macedonia under its current name, Greece says the name proves that Macedonia harbors implicit territorial claims on the northern Greek region also known as Macedonia. Never mind that by joining NATO, Macedonia would provide Greece with much-needed stability on its northern border.

Then consider Germany and France, arguably the greatest free-riding beneficiaries of American security since World War II. At the Bucharest Summit, they (together with Spain) refused to extend NATO Membership Action Plans to Georgia and Ukraine because they were afraid of provoking Russia, thanks to Europe’s growing dependence on Russian energy.

Germany, for example, already imports 35 percent of its oil and 40 percent of its natural gas from Russia, more than any country in Western Europe. The problem of energy dependency is being exacerbated by leftwing energy policies that are phasing out the country’s production of nuclear energy in favor of increased reliance on fossil fuels. Indeed, Germany’s (and Europe’s) dependence on Russian energy imports may reach 70 percent by 2020, which (if current German behavior is any gauge) will give Russia a de facto veto over decisions on German (and European) security.

Europeans, in any case, know that keeping Georgia and Ukraine out of NATO will not appease Russia for very long. Indeed, the Germans appear to be looking for a face-saving way out of Europe’s long-term geo-strategic dilemma. On March 4, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier gave a speech titled “Towards a European Ostpolitik” in which he suggests that Europe’s future lies in staking out a position mid-way between the United States and Russia. Say what?

Well, if Germany insists on turning Europe into a province of Russian, then debates over the future of NATO will be moot anyhow.

In France, meanwhile, the government on April 8 faced down a vote of no confidence, as leftists accused French President Nicolas Sarkozy of a dangerous “Atlanticist drift” that risked turning France into Bush’s poodle. Socialist leader François Hollande said Sarkozy decided to send 700 French troops to Afghanistan “under pressure from the Americans” and that France risked losing its independence on the world stage.

With allies like these, expect trouble ahead for transatlantic relations, regardless of who occupies the White House next January.

Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

13 Comments

1. RE:

I think I need a refresher course on why we Americans should be OK with our time, effort, and money being spent on NATO.

Europe is increasingly hostile to individual liberty, freedom of speech, and religion. Its governments seem to be waging war on its own culture and people with insane immigration policies and deference to overtly hostile and contradictory ideologies (islam). It is squelching the democracy by imposing the EU on its people, forfeiting national sovereignties to the Orwellian nightmare that is Brussels. It doesn’t carry its weight anywhere where the military is involved. Indeed, it doesn’t even seem interested in defending itself. It offloads responsibility for that to America, never missing an opportunity to poke America in the eye in the process.

I served in the military during the Cold War and was proud to support NATO. But that was then. It’d a different world now. Why should I want to make it safe for the European political class to wage its suicidal war on Western civilization and values?

Just what are we Americans ‘defending’ anyway?

Apr 14, 2008 - 5:06 am 2. Glenn:

Since the late 40’s the US has spent 25% or so of our defense budget on behalf of the Europeans, keeping the Russians out and the Germans down, so to speak. If the Europeans don’t need us to do that anymore let’s stop. The freeway near my house needs a lot of work.

Apr 14, 2008 - 7:03 am 3. jvon:

Have to say, I agree. The countries of Europe have been acting like a bunch of spoiled teenagers. I actually find myself in agreement with them on one point however. They resent us interfering in their affairs by exerting military influence over them. I resent having to pay for it.

It seems there is an obvious solution to this.

Apr 14, 2008 - 7:11 am 4. Saltherring:

France and Germany bear immense guilt from the past, greatly straining face-to-face relations with the U.S. on defense-related issues. France desperately desires to free itself from it’s cowardly image, but contradicts that desire by its failure to accept leadership roles to resolve Balkan, Iranian and Israeli-Palistinian flashpoints. After starting two world wars, the second of which left her in ruins, Germany offers nothing to defend herself or assist in containing/defusing unrest in the world’s troubled regions. Both nations owe their very existence to America, who shed its blood to free them. But instead of support, France and Germany offer little but arrogance and distain. And these are nations our mainstream media refer to as our allies?

Apr 14, 2008 - 8:27 am 5. Sue:

Yeah, me too! Let’s get the hell out of the rest of the world and let it take care of itself. Boy would be have tons of money for the Socialist America Obama and Shillary are going to turn us into.

Apr 14, 2008 - 9:56 am 6. Steve, UK:

Don’t blame you for a moment, guys, just hope you don’t pull out yet awhile. Unless we could work out some way of hauling the UK across the pond, Big Moves style. Somewhere just east of Martha’s Vineyard would do fine. The BBC-Guardianistas would sulk a bit, but who cares?
Loved the snap of Zapatero in the naughty chair…

Apr 14, 2008 - 2:12 pm 7. Larry Rasczak:

What is missing here, as in most American discussions of her European Allies, is any mention of the Suez Crisis of 1956, and how the U.S. sold France, the UK, and Israel down the river to advance the interests of an Egyptian dictator and his Soviet masters. This was not the first, ( see Eisenhower’s refusal to launch Operation Vulture in support of Dien Bien Phu) nor the last, time that the U.S. showed that, push come to shove, it was willing to push its’ French “Ally” over the side if doing so served the interests of the U.S. State Department.

Americans love to talk big about what we did for the French in 1944 and 1945; but most are unaware of what we did TO the French in 1956 (or 1954). As someone who was fortunate enough to have a good history teacher, and who did learn about the American role at Suez, I can totally understand why the European branch of NATO looks out for themseleves more often than the U.S. would like.

Apr 14, 2008 - 4:11 pm 8. Sean:

Who needs Europe? Go ahead and merge NATO with the UN. Once the US walks out, it will be just as feeble as the current UN forces.

Apr 15, 2008 - 1:13 pm 9. MichaelE:

Nato has long since outlived its usefulness. During the Cold War most European countries at least made some showing that they were serious about providing for their own defense. Now most of them don’t even bother pretending anymore. Europe contributes nothing to the security of the American people. That’s not an alliance, that’s freeloading and charity. Its time to offer the few real allies we actually do have in that part of the world (ie. Britian, Poland and a few others) mutual defense pacts, withdraw America’s security guarantee, withdraw from Nato and bring the boys home.

Apr 15, 2008 - 8:30 pm 10. mariana:

This is a really good piece.

AMEN! to all of you, except Larry Rasczak. Larry’s problem [like France, Germany & UK's] is that he wants to be able to sit back in his living room and direct American Forces and Resources at his whim. Suez [thank God for Eisenhower] is a lesson that Americans need to learn.

The reason France, Germany [and our dear Brit "cousins" who are cowering at the Basra Airport, while Americans die to take back "Britain's Area of Responsibility" in S. Iraq from Iran] hate GW Bush so much, is that he has refused to let them, EU or UN run American Forces [remember Gallipoli]. Any American President who allows Americans to be “commanded” by anyone else, should be hanged.

The rampant, apparently institutionalized anti-Semitism in Europe really worries me; and the only thing our Old Europe “Allies” have learnt after two world wars, is that they can extort America’s protection while leading their countrymen in virulent anti-Americanism. It’s long past time they either put up or shut up and behave like good, dependent children and deficient, addlebrained adults should. mariana

Apr 16, 2008 - 7:32 am 11. Angry African:

This is such a narrow analysis. Start crossing the Atlantic and start joining the global debate. This “you are either for us or against us” type of argument just doesn’t hold. You can use almost every single line in your piece and replace it with another name and come up with the same answer. The issue you have to face is that America is not seen as the “leading light” in the world anymore. We would love America to play that role, but Bush has pushed us too far away right now. Analyse the politics of Europe from the perspectives of Europeans and not what you want them to be – rather what they have to be for their own good. They are not there to clean your boots. They are partners not slaves or workers. Treat them as such. Don’t do the bit where you tell them it is your way or the highway.

Before you think I am anti-American. Think again. I am pro-America. I want that America we can look up to so we can point to you and say – see that’s how the world should be. Then we can tackle the oppressors and warlords of the world and give hope to those who don’t have those freedoms. But we just don’t see it right now. Read my piece on the importance of America to the world before you judge me. Ignore the last paragraph as that is about who I would like to be the next President. But it goes for any candidate really. http://angryafrican.net/2008/04/12/note-to-america-the-world-is-watching/

Apr 17, 2008 - 5:37 am 12. Boinkie:

In case no one noticed, Spain just asked the US and NATO to get back their fishing ship hijacked by Somali pirates.

What would they say if the US said: Huh?

The US with others has been patroling this area for over a year, with some success.

The French had a similar incident last week, gave ransom, and then caught the pirates with ransom fleeing back to port.

Apr 21, 2008 - 4:28 pm 13. Kenneth:

Im British/English, Germany and france continue to take the road of Anti-America so do most of Europe.
But remember America comes over to Europe Expecting European nations to worship them and we dont like it you talk as if we cant even defend our self (eg Britian is the second most powerful nation on earth and the USA dosent even acknolage that)European nations know how to defend them self and if they dont what to go to Iraq or afgan then let them, why should they Fight USA and UK wars?
Britian (UK) is neather pro or Anti America, the UK just sees the USA as our brethren or family, the UK and USA forigen policy is exactly the same both our goverments have the same priorities thats why the UK is currenty in Iraq and Afgan, not because the UK is the USA’s puppet.

But Even the UK hates it when the USA come to Europe and try to walk all over us because you think you have the right because you ’say’ you saved us,, NO usa saved a few nations eg Poland and france. But you didnt save them by your self Britian and Russia took the Brunt of the war and we saved Europe too! 3 ,3 nations saved Europe. Russia, Britian and USA.

lol german troops never even landed in Britian, and hitler lost his first battle against Britian in the battle of britian, and after He lost to us Hitler never tryed to invade us again.

Any way lets get back to the Subject at hand, USA causes Ant -American emotians in Europe, because you put us down and walk all over us.

But UK is still your ally and you can trust us, heck no other military on earth could deafeat britian apart from the USA, top 2 most powerful nations and we are family nice yes?

Nov 22, 2008 - 11:44 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: