<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AP to Bloggers: Chill Out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:05:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Photo of the Day</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-64953</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Photo of the Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-64953</guid>
		<description>[...] and other social networking sites. How come they get to use the AP&#8217;s photos but blogs like Brian Ledbetter&#8217;s don&#8217;t?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and other social networking sites. How come they get to use the AP&#8217;s photos but blogs like Brian Ledbetter&#8217;s don&#8217;t?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Pulse: Surprise Obama is a flip-floper, and more at The Liberty Preservation Alliance</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62990</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Pulse: Surprise Obama is a flip-floper, and more at The Liberty Preservation Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62990</guid>
		<description>[...] AP says the us bloggers have nothing to be concerned about. Don&#8217;t you feel better? [Source: Pajamas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP says the us bloggers have nothing to be concerned about. Don&#8217;t you feel better? [Source: Pajamas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Enator</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62914</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Enator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62914</guid>
		<description>No question that the AP&#039;s making a strategy move .

At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-aps-annual-meeting-icopyright-deal-and-more/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AP&#039;s annual meeting&lt;/a&gt;  they name &lt;a href=&quot;http://info.icopyright.com/news_041408_ap.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
 iCopyright Named Licensing Agent for Reuse of Associated Press Content Published Online&lt;/a&gt;

AP has determined that they consider to be fair-use to be exactly four words. &lt;a href=&quot;http://license.icopyright.net/user/offer.act?gid=3&amp;inprocess=t&amp;sid=36&amp;tag=3.5721%3Ficx_id%3DD90VCFA01&amp;urs=WEBPAGE&amp;urt=nullit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More than that and you pay $12.50 - $100&lt;/a&gt;.  This is pretty hypocritical considering that AP journalists help themselves routinely to much more than four words from blogs and websites in the name of &quot;fair use&quot;. 

AP takes this a step further and under the license pricing and terms of use for iCopyright they place language that liraises eyebrows and limits free speech..  Pretty unusual for an entity that lives and dies by freedom of speech protection.

iCopyright License Excerpt:
Derogatory and Unlawful Uses: You shall not use the Content in any manner or context that will be in any way derogatory to the author, the publication from which the Content came, or any person connected with the creation of the Content or depicted in the Content. You agree not to use the Content in any manner or context that will be in any way derogatory to or damaging to the reputation of Publisher, its licensors, or any person connected with the creation of the Content or referenced in the Content.&quot;

------
I think that any reasonable person would see a strategy in play and is very much at odds with rights they flaunt daily. 

AP is large and may not be a monopoly in the strictest sense, perhaps  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligopoly&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;oligopoly&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carte&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cartel&lt;/a&gt; is a better description. 

Is the AP behaving ethically and morally?  Are they being a good citizen? Many say they&#039;re not.

AP&#039;s strategy and behavior raises lots of questions and concerns:

The Poynter Institute on it&#039;s blog asks: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AP v. Bloggers: Hurting Journalism?&lt;/a&gt;

Pajama&#039;s Media Asks: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-the-ap-good-for-america/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is the Associated Press Good for America?&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps the question we need to ask is: &quot;Is the AP &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil#Evil_in_business&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;evil&lt;a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question that the AP&#8217;s making a strategy move .</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-aps-annual-meeting-icopyright-deal-and-more/" rel="nofollow">AP&#8217;s annual meeting</a>  they name <a href="http://info.icopyright.com/news_041408_ap.asp" rel="nofollow"><br />
 iCopyright Named Licensing Agent for Reuse of Associated Press Content Published Online</a></p>
<p>AP has determined that they consider to be fair-use to be exactly four words. <a href="http://license.icopyright.net/user/offer.act?gid=3&amp;inprocess=t&amp;sid=36&amp;tag=3.5721%3Ficx_id%3DD90VCFA01&amp;urs=WEBPAGE&amp;urt=nullit" rel="nofollow">More than that and you pay $12.50 &#8211; $100</a>.  This is pretty hypocritical considering that AP journalists help themselves routinely to much more than four words from blogs and websites in the name of &#8220;fair use&#8221;. </p>
<p>AP takes this a step further and under the license pricing and terms of use for iCopyright they place language that liraises eyebrows and limits free speech..  Pretty unusual for an entity that lives and dies by freedom of speech protection.</p>
<p>iCopyright License Excerpt:<br />
Derogatory and Unlawful Uses: You shall not use the Content in any manner or context that will be in any way derogatory to the author, the publication from which the Content came, or any person connected with the creation of the Content or depicted in the Content. You agree not to use the Content in any manner or context that will be in any way derogatory to or damaging to the reputation of Publisher, its licensors, or any person connected with the creation of the Content or referenced in the Content.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I think that any reasonable person would see a strategy in play and is very much at odds with rights they flaunt daily. </p>
<p>AP is large and may not be a monopoly in the strictest sense, perhaps  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligopoly" rel="nofollow">oligopoly</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carte" rel="nofollow">cartel</a> is a better description. </p>
<p>Is the AP behaving ethically and morally?  Are they being a good citizen? Many say they&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>AP&#8217;s strategy and behavior raises lots of questions and concerns:</p>
<p>The Poynter Institute on it&#8217;s blog asks: <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31" rel="nofollow">AP v. Bloggers: Hurting Journalism?</a></p>
<p>Pajama&#8217;s Media Asks: <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-the-ap-good-for-america/" rel="nofollow">Is the Associated Press Good for America?</a></p>
<p>Perhaps the question we need to ask is: &#8220;Is the AP <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil#Evil_in_business" rel="nofollow">evil</a><a>?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debby</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62832</link>
		<dc:creator>Debby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62832</guid>
		<description>Who needs them anyway...I mean really...I will just boycott..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs them anyway&#8230;I mean really&#8230;I will just boycott..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes it boils down to Freedom of the Press&#8230;doesn&#8217;t it? &#171; Valentine Bonnaire</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62748</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes it boils down to Freedom of the Press&#8230;doesn&#8217;t it? &#171; Valentine Bonnaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62748</guid>
		<description>[...] 20, 2008   One would ask, in an era of almost complete media control here why they might want this, especially right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20, 2008   One would ask, in an era of almost complete media control here why they might want this, especially right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby McGill</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62692</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62692</guid>
		<description>Oh... thank god. I have lost a lot of sleep with dreams of AP chasing me down.

Bobby
idlewordship.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; thank god. I have lost a lot of sleep with dreams of AP chasing me down.</p>
<p>Bobby<br />
idlewordship.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snapped shot · always watching the all-seeing eye</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62636</link>
		<dc:creator>snapped shot · always watching the all-seeing eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ap-to-bloggers-chill-out/#comment-62636</guid>
		<description>[...] hear more about the AP&#039;s latest assault on the unwashed rabble that is the blogosphere?  Alright, relax already:  Fret not, fearless blogger—The Associated Press is not coming after you. They have been so busy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hear more about the AP&#8217;s latest assault on the unwashed rabble that is the blogosphere?  Alright, relax already:  Fret not, fearless blogger—The Associated Press is not coming after you. They have been so busy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
