That is purely an opinion.

And in this day and age and society –given what it is regarding politics and gender– it is ‘prejudiced’ and oppressive. (Nobody would tolerate the reverse diagnosis: “women bad to men, should thus change”.)

==========
Number two. “Adaption” and “Evolution”

Nothing “adapts”. That is not the way evolution works.

Natural selection is the way “evolution” works and it aint pretty. (There are other complexity system too–none of them are touchy feel-y either.)

“Adaption” is classic liberal wordplay to trick people away from the truth of how “evolution” works, because liberals don’t like the facts as much as christers don’t.

When creatures ‘evolve’ from one form to another, what happens is environments change and consequently most pups die/drown, while some freaks/runts who normally didn’t thrive go on to be the new top dog strains of that new niche.

_And no utopias happen in the offing._ Amphibians are every bit as cruel as the deep blue past was; As Romans were every bit a deadly as cromags; …as the lingering cavalry fort [ie the city] is every bit as deadly and oppressive as the Indians were.

So if society is “evolving”, no one is magical adpating. We are simply creating a world hostile to certain types (ie killing strains that don’t fit anymore) so that other types can thrive. The sewer, of have-n-have-not brutallity, that are the cities is the new ‘utopia’.

Welcomme to what liberlaism’s progress really means.

—
And note that I don’t care what your professors or pastors think: they are wrong and should be in political reeducation camps. So don’t post some nonsense response about how “they aint got no profes for ebolution –and give me back my stems!”

You conservatives –ie natural born dunces– need to get your heads out of the philososphical and pyschological hole you hide in.

As an exercise towards that end, stop fighting liberalism’s wars for it. You dunce conservatives are doing it to yourselves again right now as I type (cause you’re stubborn) –fighting to marginalize your ethos and strengthen your master /enemy.

Then Eugenics –ie testing in childhood and sterilization– must be imposed. (Test(s) should look for intellect, health and sanity. Medical technology can be used to make one better prepared to ‘pass’ the test(s).)

If not the neo-cortex becomes extinct.

Simple.

There are pressures on both men and women, we both deal with these pressures differently. One, due to biology – how we’re wired. And two, how society has told us how to see ourselves as men and as women.

Yes, the world is changing, evolution happens just as it has from day one. If we don’t adapt where does that live us? Revert back surely isn’t the answer. One has only to look at strict patriarcal societies to see each one is embroiled in strife and war from Africa, to the middle east to Latin America. In countries where women have equality eg., western Europe, North America there is an interesting absence of war/brutal ideology.

To blame women en masse for men’s problems isn’t the solution. Men do need help. They need help understanding themselves, that they go through menopause just like women, that testosterone levels rising and falling create a real problem for me that women have nothing to do with.
These are real physical things that occur in men. Rather than lashing out against women which is totally counterproductive step backward, men would be better served to really research why they feel the way they do. A large part of it, as I have been researching, is hormonal. A relatively new concept that may not be widely known OR accepted by the average man. The more you know…

You seem to have the combination of being absolutely clueless about the pressures on men or what it’s like to be a man … and a very strong know-it-all attitude.

That’s not good.

But it won’t work.

http://www.menalive.com

This is just like trying to show that teenage crime really took off in the early 1980’s – the first generation of post Roe vs. Wade kids hit puberty… and of course we are not supposed to blame it on boys living with single/divorced mothers… even though it is the leading indicator of a criminal record.

Men’s role in education has been attacked, men’s role in the family has been attacked, and men’s role in the workplace has been attacked – and the biggest alterations that have occurred in all these areas have been at the hands of the screeching feminists… and you blame-deniers yourselves admit that a person’s role in their family, their job and society is a leading contributor to suicide. DDC’s own brother was set off by an ending relationship. Why does the phrase “forest for the trees” come to mind?

No matter how hard you want to believe otherwise, in the end, you will always come to the same underlying causes as to why the suicide rates have increased so much – same as the increased crime and violence rates. The root cause is the upheaval and complete ignorance (or not) of the feminist movement. How can one ever look to solve a problem when one ignores such a glaring contributor? In the same way, our educators refuse to look at boy’s problems in education as having anything to do with how feminism has restructured our schools. They will come up with hundreds of excuses, but one they will never examine is the massive changes they made AGAINST boys in the name of feminism.

Men have heard “look in the mirror” for long enough. It is not unreasonable for them to ask others to check in the mirror too.

There are any numbers of suicide hotlines a man, woman or child can call free of charge, if they are contemplating suicide and would rather not tell a family/friend about what they are experiencing. The issue seems to be one of two things: the will to seek help, and the knowledge that one does, in fact, NEED help.

For those who haven’t the funds and no not mind speaking to actual people far to face, there are many group meetings also, many which charge nothing at all.

Another quick personal acct. Leading me to believe that the way men treT each other contibutes to this feeling of “men don’t show feeling.” coaches, at the mr. High and HS level berate boys on the field. As a mother of 2 sons we e perienced this first hand. “be a man, suck it up, etc” my husband went balistic on one such coach. Boys are competitive by nature. When a male figurenthey look up to berated their ability to compete at an early age this is harmful. Obviously he can’t take him on, he’s bigger. Men do to men also what women are being accused of. And it happens much earlier in life. Yet a man will hardly
acknowledge such. Another recent instance, our 8 year old nephew, on the way back from the beach talked to us about his football coach. He had fallen hard on his elbow and started to cry during on game and sure enough the. Coach had told him to stop crying “guys don’t cry” I told him that he should never allow anyone to tell him not to cry when he was in pain.

The fault lay with the way a young boy is nurtured by those he is influenced by. Dad, mother, teachers, coaches, grandparents and friends. If a man has come unglued to the point of suicide as a husband chances are the seeds were planted years prior. The largest segment of suicides as not middle-aged divorced or unemplyed men, it is boys teenage to 20’s and elderly men. Any stats on Suicides will verify those facts.

Can you tell me why the same feminist who tell us women can do anything a man can do (and often as they add “only better” with a grin on their face) have to have affirmative actions in every area to do all these things? If they do not have affirmative action, they demand lower standards for things such as female fire fighters and police officers.

Can you tell me why Congress currently spends approx. $1 billion (!) annually on domestic violence programs, and the recent economic stimulus bill just added another $325 million. Additionally, domestic violence programs often receive sizeable private donations as well as state and local funding.

RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting) reports that Congressional spending this year works out to approximately $2,948 per female domestic violence victim. (http://www.mediarad ar.org/alert2009 0420.php)

The 2010 demand for a funding increase amounts to an additional $623 per female domestic violence victim every year. Meanwhile, federal funding for male victims is negligible.

Can you tell me why only feminist were allowed to help these domestic abuse laws? This would be like asking only the KKK to write racial relation laws.

Can you tell me why the National Organization of Women and other feminist groups fought tooth and nail to keep the VAWA with the “W” and not have a family violence act which would protect all victims of abuse as they have their parades often with tax payer money with their signs “Stop violence to WOMEN” instead of “Stop Violence!

Can you tell me why feminist have a war on fathers and want to drive them out of their homes as they almost worship single motherhood in spite of all of the damage it causes to both our boys and girls.

And to bring this back to Dr. Helen’s message here about suicide, we do know that more men take their own lives after a divorce and the feminist actually brag about this saying men are weak…BUT it is not the breakup with his wife that drives these men to suicide…it is the fact that many of them have their children STOLEN from them with false accusations of abuse that drives them to it.

Read this to get an idea of how it feels to have your children stolen from you:

http://shatterdmen.com/Fire.htm