Email This to a Friend
Gen. Petraeus: ‘The Enemy Remains Lethal, Resilient, and Very Dangerous’
General David Petraeus, the commander of the U.S. mission in Iraq, sits for an exclusive interview with PJM's Austin Bay.
MR. BAY: Gen. David Petraeus, let’s pick up on your rheostat analogy. You’re giving us a conditions-based approach to assessing victory in a very intricate, complex and long struggle. Now this is an incremental victory–one step up; a half-step back. Enemy action results in a coalition response; coalition actions result in an enemy response. That’s war among human beings. It strikes me that some of those conditions include a sovereign Iraq that is largely responsible for its own internal security, but is also a United States ally. These are some of the conditions mentioned in the Update Strategic Overwatch video at the ArenaUSA.com. That said; if you would, please comment on a sovereign Iraq emerging as a US ally.
Did you get a chance to look at that video?
GENERAL PETRAEUS: Just briefly, I’m afraid, Austin. But let me just come back to what you just said because the way you stated that is exactly right. It is incremental, and it does have fits and starts. It is this exercise of pushing the stone up a hill, a Sisyphean endeavor at times where you do make two steps up and one step back. Sometimes you get one step up and two steps back.
But, overall, over the course of the past year or so, really since the start of the surge of offenses in particular, that was the large comprehensive offensive launched in June 2007 when we had all of the surge brigades on the ground, since that time, there has been a fairly steady degree of improvement week in/week out, month in/month out. Certainly, again, there have been flare-ups at times. The militia counterattacks, when Prime Minister al-Maliki ordered Iraqi forces and the Basra, were really quite a substantial — more than a flare-up.
But, over time, those were dealt with, more than dealt with, in fact, and very severe losses inflicted on the militia.
MR. BAY: We’re dealing with conditions. We’re dealing with trying to achieve a certain state, a condition-based state. Defining victory is very, very tough. Now, approached as a historian, I think defining victory is hard under any circumstances.
Do you, General David Petraeus, have a definition of victory or an idea of what victory would be in Iraq or in the global war on terror?
GENERAL PETRAEUS: Well, what we have is a comprehensive campaign plan. It is a plan that is joint. It’s between the embassy and embassies, because not just the U.S. Embassy, Ambassador Crocker and his great team, but also the U.K., Australia and other embassies of the Coalition and the Multi-National Force – Iraq have combined in a joint campaign plan. Very, very comprehensive. It has lines of operation that include not just security but also political, economic, diplomatic. Then there are other supporting lines, rule of law, governmental capacity, informational line, and so forth.
And for each of those lines of operation, we have objectives. And we had near-term objectives which were for the summer of 2008 time frame. And, frankly, we met those in the security line of operation. Very nearly met them. If they can pass a provincial elections law, I think that it could be declared that they have met them in the political line of operation.
There’s been very good progress in the diplomatic line, and actually in the economic line as well, all certainly founded on the progress in the security line.
We have similar objectives, or another set of objectives for the summer of 2009. And then there is an end-state as well. And the shorthand for the end-state is a country that is at peace with itself and its neighbors, a government that is represented of and responsive to people, a productive member, if you will, of the region and the global economy, and so forth.
But, again, we have considerable drill-downs, if you will, that describe the objectives relative to, in the security line of operations, relative to the enemies, the bad guys, if you will, relative to Iraqi forces, the different types that are here, and so forth.
MR. BAY: Well, we understand that the enemy always gets a vote, but what you’ve described is a situation where Iraq is not only, for the most part, defending itself and making its own sovereign decisions, but it’s also an ally of the United States. Am I getting that correctly?
GENERAL PETRAEUS: That is certainly one of the objectives. Again, Iraq — obviously, what we would want to see is an Iraq that is also an ally in the global war on terror. And it certainly is taking resolute action against the Al-Qaeda in Iraq elements and other extremist elements of that type, and more recently, in the past six to eight months, quite strong stands against the militia, the Shia militia, and also the so-called special groups, these elements supported by Iran that have caused such problems for Iraq as well.
MR. BAY: General Petraeus, you’re referring to Operation Knights Charge, in part, the Iraqi operation. Regard that Operation Knights Charge action against the Shia special groups, and perhaps the Madhi Army as well, was it largely successful as a security operation?
GENERAL PETRAEUS: I think that you have to judge that as a success over time. Again, having said that, we very much are keeping our powder dry and watching to see what Iran does and what the special groups do. Muqtada al-Sadr, whose militia did cause such problems and really became a mafia-like element on the streets of Basra and in Sadr City and in some other areas of Iraq — those are going to be reinvented, according to Muqtada al-Sadr, as a social services organization. Again, everyone is waiting to see how that will go, and they’re waiting to see whether Iran is going to rearm and retrain and reequip the special group leaders, many of whom went back to Iran after the cease-fire after the pounding that they took some four to six months ago.
So, again, there’s a wait-and-see attitude with respect to the militia and the special groups.
![]() |
![]() |
Podcasts | PJM Home |





PJM Home


Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
20 Comments
1. Austin Bay Blog » UPDATE 2: An Interview With General David Petraeus:[...] I had the privilege of speaking with the soldier-scholar at length this past Monday, August 4. Both my ArenaUSA channel and PajamasMedia will be running programs with the complete interviews. TheArenaUSA will be a convergence media program (audio-video-print) that will feature hyperlinked notes as well as a short video introduction — and of course other related programming, like the Strategic Overwatch video. (Registration is recommended but no longer required — so you can go straight to the video.) UPDATE: PajamasMedia has the interview as a “Deep Background” podcast. [...]
Aug 6, 2008 - 12:24 pm 2. Vodkapundit » Programming Note:[...] 06 Aug 2008 at 01:49 pm You can listen to Austin Bay’s unabridged General Petraeus interview here, and you can now hear this week’s PJM Political — with your vodka-swilling host, [...]
Aug 6, 2008 - 12:49 pm 3. August 6th Link Roundup | THE HOT JOINTS:[...] Audio: 30 Min. Interview with General Petraeus [...]
Aug 6, 2008 - 3:44 pm 4. Austin Bay Blog » Terror Connects to Crime In Iraq: Analysis by General David Petraeus:[...] you. The Petraeus interview is presented as an Arena Report. There will be more. PajamasMedia has a Deep Background program with the audio, [...]
Aug 6, 2008 - 8:42 pm 5. Jay:President David Petraeus? In the foreseeable future.
Aug 7, 2008 - 7:31 am 6. ZEITGEIST:[...] AUSTIN BAY interviews General Petraeus. [...]
Aug 7, 2008 - 8:16 am 7. Arthur:Among the few people in recent years who single-handedly changed the course of history for the better, General Petraeus would have to be at the top of the list. The entire foreign policy success or failure of the current administration (with Iraq playing such a major role) hinged on the leadership and clear vision of this one man. George W. Bush should be forever grateful to Gen. Petraeus for this.
Aug 7, 2008 - 10:33 am 8. John:General Petraeus, an American hero. A solid interview with a great man.
Aug 7, 2008 - 11:35 am 9. Petraeus Interview « Tai-Chi Policy:[...] August 7, 2008 Posted by taoist in Iraq, Iraq War, The Military. trackback Over at Pajamas Media. Worth the [...]
Aug 7, 2008 - 12:10 pm 10. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » “Near” Agreement Reached On Withdrawal From Iraq:[...] see coming if we do take out the combat troops before the Iraqi Army is ready. Austin Bay has a great interview with General Petraeus over at Pajamas Media and one of his questions deals directly with the huge gains made in Iraq and [...]
Aug 7, 2008 - 1:02 pm 11. Chaz:President David Petraus?
Aug 7, 2008 - 2:43 pm 12. edh:I’m all for that.
Nah ..you mean JK Rowling for President…the hack writer of repetitious childrens books voted by our media to be PERSON OF THE YEAR instead of Gen. Petraeus. And after all its the media that counts..they manufacture the candidates..as our idiotic infatuation with Obama proves.
Aug 7, 2008 - 6:50 pm 13. fred:The people who criticize this man have utterly no idea of just how intelligent and broadly read he is. An intellectual warrior who also understands diplomacy. I’m glad I took the time to read this interview. It was worthwhile.
Plus, you can tell he loves his soldiers and cares for them. His closing remarks are humble and full of that sense of comraderie that all veterans understand.
I’m wondering what Gen. Petraeus must think of Obama? Would have liked to have been a fly on the wall when Sen. Obama came to town to chat with the general. But I’m sure it will be years before we find out what transpired there. After he retires from the service.
Aug 7, 2008 - 9:34 pm 14. Rob:Interesting to have the ideas of Gen Petraeus presented so clearly.
Aug 8, 2008 - 4:14 am 15. Madia’s Flawed Iraq Policy #1 |Jack of All Trades:What we are seeing here, with Pajamasmedia and Col Bay’s Arena is a new media information channel, that can displace the old MSM fossil media’s bias and ignorance.
[...] a recent interview with Gen Petraeus by Austin Bay, the following was [...]
Aug 8, 2008 - 3:51 pm 16. John Moore:Great work!
Too many Americans, especially on the left, don’t understand how professional our military has become, and how well educated its members are – from the low ranking enlisted to the top generals. US military forces are now made up of true professionals – well selected, well educated, well motivated, brave and capable.
Aug 8, 2008 - 6:27 pm 17. Talking about Iraq:[...] to sit down recently for a 30-minute interview. Pajamas Media has posted the audio and transcript here. The whole interview is necessary reading. At the conclusion, Bay asks Petraeus if there is [...]
Aug 8, 2008 - 7:11 pm 18. Altitude 5430:Thank you, Austin.
While it could never come close to being an adequate expression of gratitude for rescuing this enterprise … thank you, General Petraeus and all those who served with you.
Aug 9, 2008 - 1:52 pm 19. Pajamas Media » Gen. Petraeus, Remastered:[...] Tune in here to listen. [...]
Aug 25, 2008 - 2:36 pm 20. Charles Marion:Liberals have never questioned the performance, sacrifice, commitment, courage or quality of the military. It’s the always been about the reasoning of invading Iraq in the first place, and the only logical conclusion remains oil. That as a White house goal has also been an abject failure as the contracts and control of the oil fields has gone to China. Surge or no surge our brave men and women continue to die unnecessarily and John McCain’s notion to stay in Iraq until their deaths are justified is obscene.It was wrong to go into Iraq in 2003 and it is still wrong today.
Sep 27, 2008 - 11:28 amYou right wing conservatives just keep telling yourselves that we have a reason to be there and maybe some day you will start to believe it yourselves.