<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pajamas Media &#187; Clayton E. Cramer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/author/claytonecramer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blaming Sex Talk &#8216;Squeamishness&#8217; for Rise in STDs</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/blaming-sex-talk-squeamishness-for-rise-in-stds/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/blaming-sex-talk-squeamishness-for-rise-in-stds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor & Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cdc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=72657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, really. The CDC thinks Americans don't talk about sex enough.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/blaming-sex-talk-squeamishness-for-rise-in-stds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running Cars on Water?</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/running-cars-on-water/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/running-cars-on-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carburator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mileage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=72015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who expect something for nothing will fall for even the most wild-eyed promises and conspiracy theories.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/running-cars-on-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Daley Blames Fort Hood on Guns, Not Islam</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mayor-daley-blames-fort-hood-on-guns-not-islam/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mayor-daley-blames-fort-hood-on-guns-not-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayor Daley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=71883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this wasn’t such a dreadfully serious matter, it would almost be funny watching Democrats insist that there’s no elephant in the bathtub.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mayor-daley-blames-fort-hood-on-guns-not-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>199</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armed and Female</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/armed-and-female/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/armed-and-female/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies-only gun camps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=71203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's nothing intrinsically masculine about guns — just look at Fort Hood's Sgt. Kimberly Munley.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/armed-and-female/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compartmentalizing Morality: &#8216;Christian&#8217; Slave Owners and &#8216;Green&#8217; Polluters</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/compartmentalizing-morality-christian-slave-owners-and-green-polluters/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/compartmentalizing-morality-christian-slave-owners-and-green-polluters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassius marcellus clay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frederick douglass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=70818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avoiding examination of your actions when they directly oppose your morals is a human behavior, not a phenomenon of the religious.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/compartmentalizing-morality-christian-slave-owners-and-green-polluters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Openly Carrying Guns Can Be Unwise, Even When It&#8217;s Legal</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/openly-carrying-guns-can-be-unwise-even-when-its-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/openly-carrying-guns-can-be-unwise-even-when-its-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concealed Carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shotgun News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=70061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun owners should think hard about whether it serves our best interests to offend and disturb our neighbors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/openly-carrying-guns-can-be-unwise-even-when-its-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>250</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Danger of Legal Precedents</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-danger-of-legal-precedents/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-danger-of-legal-precedents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stare Decisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a precedent relevant to one question is applied to a largely unrelated one, a travesty of justice can result.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-danger-of-legal-precedents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Righteousness on a Bumper Sticker</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/self-righteousness-on-a-bumper-sticker/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/self-righteousness-on-a-bumper-sticker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bumper sticker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-righteous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A slogan with so many layers of arrogance that it deserves a careful dissection.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/self-righteousness-on-a-bumper-sticker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fourteenth Amendment Shootout at the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-fourteenth-amendment-and-gun-control/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-fourteenth-amendment-and-gun-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incorporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privileges or immunities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A case before the Court will decide how far the states can go when it comes to gun control. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-fourteenth-amendment-and-gun-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You More Likely to Be Shot Because You Own a Gun?</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[. Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another flawed study attempts to make the case for keeping citizens defenseless.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
