DITTO;

I gave you the entire case. — Another View

The ‘case’ is not what’s the most important part. The most important part is the ‘outcome’.

You pointed to an article that said there was an ‘agreement’ between the plaintiff and the respondent.

[1] We have not seen that agreement yet.
[2] Because there was no ruling, other than the possible acceptance of the agreement by the court hearing the case, there was no one found to be at fault, as far as we can tell at this point.

Is does not take Sherlock Holmes to understand what happened. — Another View

Apparently it does, in your case. You’re obviously jumping to a conclusion, which is all too typical.

Talk to me when you find the text of the agreement and evidence showing that the court has accepted the agreement. Otherwise, live with your delusions.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[There is nothing to which some men will not stoop in order to avoid having to think. Let alone face reality.]

Funny your concerned about me lying. You should vigorously investigate this case. Hell contact K.Harris office and just ask. There are plenty of contacts in the information I gave you.

The first is dated 2003, i.e., not particularly germane to the agreement.

The latter is NOT the agreement. It’s just a rehash of what you provided earlier, i.e., no news.

Are you trying to apply the Big Lie technique to me? It won’t work. I know better.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. Is Another View a graduate of the Goebbel’s School of Journalism?

There is no judge that would have heard this case if it had no merit. It got no media attention. Also you must remember. What do you think is gonna happen to the people who gave the White House to Bush? Nothing. He can’t be impeached even today.

Remember it’s only about the truth… Now you can start to count the sheep.

Here are your links
http://www.buttersquash.net/archives/naacp-docket-w-docs.htm

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/politics/main520754.shtml

I will buy him a etch a sketch to keep him entertained. — Another View

Upgrade my Adobe Creative Suite…..Macintosh OS X.

You see I used your name. You earned my respect. But for your comedic act. — Another View

I need your ‘respect’ like I need an ulcer.

RE: The Lawsuit

So, the lawsuit was settled YESTERDAY. Interesting.

I look forward to your providing the nature of the ‘agreement’; when it FINALLY becomes public information. The point here being that it’s an ‘agreement’. It isn’t a finding of the court that someone did something wrong.

The import of an ‘agreement’ depends largely on the verbiage therein and we don’t have that just yet.

RE: Research

Where I come from, i.e., a scientific background in education, fortified with a strong background in logic vis-a-vis 27 years in the infantry, if you want to prove something to someone, you go out and bring the information necessary to prove it to their attention.

You did that well with the latest link.

I look forward to your providing me with a link to the text of this agreement mentioned therein.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Figures don't lie, but liars figure. Or obfuscate.]

They left the gate open… lol.. All seriousness. This must turn your worlds and beliefs upside down. Do your own research and prove me wrong. You will soon realize you cannot.

I feel like Hulk Hogan slapping three midget wrestlers around. Tedious and tiring but necessary.

Your buddy Chuckles is a artist with words. Too bad it’s visual not literal. That equates to adult finger painting. I will buy him a etch a sketch to keep him entertained.