THIS NONSENSE IS FROM A FOOL WHOM “PJM” DEEMS ACCEPTABLE TO ACCEPT AS A “CONTRIBUTOR”! HAH!!!

Hey Bwill: for 40 years, I WAS a “Democrat” and GREW and LEARNED.

IT’S ABOUT TIME YOU DO THE SAME.

Your drivel is spent.

Also, how do you secretly tell millions of people anything?

“Second, Hillary’s supporters are racist. If Obama is defeated, his supporters will rally to her. Hillary’s supporters will never vote for Obama, partly because she’ll secretly tell them not to, but mainly because they’re racially biased. She’s not bragging, that’s just the way it is.”

What do you base this claim of racism off of? Maybe they just don’t want someone with absolutely no experience. Or maybe they just think that Obama is racist. After all, there is at least some evidence for that.

“First, she’s a sore loser. If Obama is chosen, she’ll probably refuse to campaign for him. Or, if she does, she’ll do it in a resentful, half-hearted way to assure his defeat and aid her effort to run again in 2012. Unlike her opponent, Hillary’s not going to lose gracefully. That’s not a criticism, just a fact.

Second, Hillary’s supporters are racist. If Obama is defeated, his supporters will rally to her. Hillary’s supporters will never vote for Obama, partly because she’ll secretly tell them not to, but mainly because they’re racially biased. She’s not bragging, that’s just the way it is.

And thirdly, unlike Obama, Hillary has no ethical standards. Critics agree, once she gets the nomination, she’ll stop at absolutely nothing to win, whereas there are some things that Obama simply won’t do. He’s been reluctant to play the race card, but Hillary’s happy to play the gender and race cards, even if it doesn’t make sense.”

All of this was spoken in the first person by the woman acting as Hilary, though it’s recapped here in 3rd person.

I’m not a big fan of SNL, wasn’t even a fan back in the Belushi/Ackroyd days when it was supposedly good. Thing is, humor is best when it’s true, or at least based on truth. Anyone care to refute any of the above as obviously false? It’s a bit outrageous (she would never say any of the above) but that’s what makes it funny.

Everyone knew Hillary would win, but this is beyond a blowout. This gives Hillary some serious pushback when talking to the Dem leaders and superdelegates.

I don’t think it will be enough to derail the nomination for Obama, but November will be a different story.

It seems likely that this campaign will continue–in the ugly new parlance–to “racialize” and not just because Obama is black. It’s a very understandable response on the part of white voters to sense that a candidate who reveres Malcolm X, attends a black power church for 20 years and only disavows its wacko pastor when the candidate’s campaign is about to implode, is not worth trusting to look out for white citizens as well as black.

Maybe in four, eight, twelve years Obama can prove himself by deeds, not words, to be worthy of that kind of trust. But not this year.

Monsieur Paules, thank you very much. Your flattering & supporting views regarding my 19th. century French literature interests encourage me very much. So far I was able to translate/edit only a little part of the memoir we discuss here, so you can expect more about Emperor Obama’s triumphal entrance in Moscow and about his superb decision to cross Berezina (as we all have already gleaned from the previous post), and much more – the book in discussion is large. At the right time, I would appreciate your input for my rendering of Emperor Obama’s Elba & Et. Helen vacations.
’till then, monsieur Paules, best regards, don’t strangle y/self with the scarf and above all, don’t let your mistress wait!
Bye – your servant, Misanthropicus

If so, try to articulate it betteer.

>Ed Wallis:

Bwill Bwadley, I was quoting the author, don’t attribute the words to me! LEARN TO READ (is this the sign of a genetically defective moron or what?).

As far as Obama’s likely impact…see the lighthearted video here:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/13/video-obamatopia/
May 13, 2008 – 1:22 pm