Comments on: Constitution Is Big Winner in D.C. Gun Case

By: larry w. campbell

larry w. campbell — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:27:35 +0000

Update US v Campbell New ruling from commissioner of appeals
I may attack state court process that lead to US v Campbell
Since I am blind, being able to read case law might be a good thing at this time.

I proved my point, not sure if I want to file the appeal now, if I win that will be a cert , why 5000.00 such orders per day in all states . One thousand per day in the Cal courts all attach guns without any proof of harm

Federal court Judge Shubb Sac court, I understand those judges are running an assembly line US V Campbell CR S 03- -0483 wbs gg hp

By: Seven States that Will Decide the Election « THE “G” BLOG @WordPress.com

Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:33:30 +0000

[...] Vermont will tell you that the folks next door, with their “Live Free or Die” motto, [94] like their guns. But New Hampshire’s populace is culturally diverse. As you move east away from the Connecticut [...]

By: Pajamas Media » Seven States That Will Decide the Election

Pajamas Media » Seven States That Will Decide the Election — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:17:28 +0000

[...] Vermont will tell you that the folks next door, with their “Live Free or Die” motto, like their guns. But New Hampshire’s populace is culturally diverse. As you move east away from the [...]

By: Pajamas Media » D.C. Handgun Restriction May Be Deadly

Pajamas Media » D.C. Handgun Restriction May Be Deadly — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:01:05 +0000

[...] can now protect themselves with the most common handguns used for personal defense. The recent Heller decision struck down the District of Columbia’s prohibition on handguns, but the [...]

By: Pro-Gun Progressive » That’s Why He Hacks, Er…Writes For The City Paper

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:48:16 +0000

[...] that Miller’s defense attorney essentially abdicated his role. What’s more, Miller did NOT endorse a collective rights view (whatever the heck that would mean [...]

By: Gozer the Carpathian

Gozer the Carpathian — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:31:40 +0000

While I’m glad the SC finally realized they were supposed to rule on the constitutionality of laws, I wish we didn’t have to rely on them. They are 9 people who we’ve invested WAY too much power into. With a simple flop one way or another they can change the law. The judicial branch shouldn’t write law, or execute it, it should just decide if something fits current law or not. PERIOD.

By: Pinkie Ann LeBrainne

Pinkie Ann LeBrainne — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:51:19 +0000

Cheers NB who cited the horror that results when a population is disarmed—
Santa Anna tore up the Mexican Consitution of 1824 and tried to disarm those pesky Tejanos and Texicans. Hence the famous Gonzales “Come and Take It Flag” with the cannon, that the Mexican army failed to “take.” Texas has a strong distaste for dictators, and I promise, will never give up the personal ownership of firearms.

By: Will Becker

Will Becker — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:58:24 +0000

What a close call. One Justice is all it would have taken,to reverse the decision,and our Constiution could be almost worthless.Thank GOD for Conservative Justices.

By: Edmund Jenks (MAXINE)

Edmund Jenks (MAXINE) — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:09:10 +0000

Another 5-4 decision, thank GOD the flop was in the right direction. We, at MAXINE, do not “get” why the SCOTUS made the margin on this decision so thin.

At least these people left us all with a tool to, if inclined, overturn their earlier 5-4 decision concerning the use of the death penalty in cases that involve persistant/preditory child rape.

By: Dodgeblogium » SCOTUS gets it right

Dodgeblogium » SCOTUS gets it right — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:45:08 +0000

[...] the Supreme Court of the US got something right for a change. They have declared the DC gun ban as unconstitutional. The NRA are now going to [...]