What is truly bizarre, is ALL the things that Liberals hold dear will be the first things destroyed if Islam succeeds. Say bye bye to rights for women, abortion, secular society, separation of church and state – gay marriage, it will be death for gays (litterly) – the list goes on. If you would like to seek proof of what an Islamic society would be, just study a few current Islamic societies that exist today. Saudi Arabia and Iran would be pretty good models. Gays and Women have no rights in these places. For that matter neither do non-Muslims.

In a twisted sort of sense, it would actually be kind of good for guys. Multiple women for each, easier to get all the good jobs, as women would be “put back in there place” in the home. Wouldn’t have to deal with political correctness on what is said about certain things like, gays etc – because they would all be killed if they spoke up.

To tell you the truth I am totally amazed that gays and women’s groups worldwide, do not unite and go after Islam on a daily basis. Because if Islam succeeds in what it is trying to do – gays and women will lose EVERYTHING they have gained in the last 200 years or so. Ignorance is bliss alright – and Liberals are either blind or are gambling with our very lives – as we know it. The world has seen this kind of left leaning lunacy before …. it was 1939 – when they believed that Hitler could be appeased into being a nice guy. He took there deals, smiled, signed there agreements of peace, then proceeded to start to roll across Europe. Liberals could simply not believe that something this evil could actually exist. They were wrong!!

If there are not immigration policy changes made – we will see countries in Europe become Islamic states in our lifetime. Probably starting with France. Maybe that will be a wake up call for the rest of us in the west. It is also possible that a massive civil war will break out in Europe – over the Muslim issue – sometime in the next 20 years. Bottom line is, where ever Islam exists in the world today – along with it goes problems of violence or political appeasement for the host country. So much for the religion of peace and tolerance.

Islam divides the entire world/humanity into two—the world of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the world of warfare (Dar al-Harb). These two worlds are in permanent confrontation, until Islam replaces the current civilization with its own version, the Islamic Caliphate

Islamic ethics are dualistic. Islam has one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for the kafirs (non-believers).

Kafir logic is based upon Aristotelian law of non-contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one of them must be false. Islamic logic is dualistic. The Koran establishes the logic of Islam. The Koran of Mecca contradicts the Koran of Medina, but since both Korans are perfect, both sides of the contradiction are true. Dualistic logic allows two contradictory “facts” to be true at the same time. Islamic logic is built on contradiction.
Allah is the god of duality and submission. Islamic civilization is based upon the principles of duality and submission.
In his early phase in Mecca, Mohammed only talked about religious slavery to Allah/Mohammed. The Koran promises the use of violence in Hell after death. The Koran of Mecca has 67% of its text devoted to how the kafirs (unbelievers) must submit to Allah/ Mohammed.
Then in Medina, Mohammed’s message became political, and he became violent without limits towards kafirs. Mohammed made all the Jews of Medina submit to him by robbery, murder, war, assassinations, rape, torture, executions, exile and enslavement.

Some definitions and practices that you should consider regarding Islam…and perhaps you can see why even in modern times….a country can still be 100% Islamic as it is a total system and is uncompromising once in place and can use any mechanism it desires to get and stay in place.

Since we are West what we see if the interface between Islam and non Islam… a couple definations.

Taqiyya – Lying and deception of infidels (taqiyya) is encouraged. The word “Taqiyya” literally means: “Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one’s beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies. In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims.

Falsehoods told to prevent the denigration of Islam, to protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned in the Qur’an and Sunna, including lying under oath in testimony before a court, deceiving by making distorted statements to the media such as the claim that Islam is a “religion of peace”. A Muslim is even permitted to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam, so long as he remains faithful to Islam in his heart. (See endnotes).
http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Taqiyya-Islamic-Principle-Lying-for-Allah.htm

Hudna – Arabic word often translated as “cease-fire.- Historically used as a tactic aimed at allowing the party declaring the hudna to regroup while tricking an enemy into lowering its guard. When the hudna expires, the party that declared it is stronger and the enemy weaker. The term comes from the story of the Muslim conquest of Mecca. Instead of a rapid victory, Muhammad made a ten-year treaty with the Kuraysh tribe. In 628 AD, after only two years of the ten-year treaty, Muhammad and his forces concluded that the Kuraysh were too weak to resist. The Muslims broke the treaty and took over all of Mecca without opposition. This was the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah ending with Muhammad marching on Mecca along with 10,000 men.

One reason Islam advances is that like the mafia, theologically there is no way out…. So while a temporary marriage may be temporary. There is really no temporary Muslim in a Muslim dominated society.

Irtidad – Deserting of one’s faith, for a Muslim, becomes a shar’i/religious issue. As a Muslim you cannot become an apostate. If there are doubts in your mind about the fundamental beliefs of Islam, then discuss, question, debate, study and solve them BUT you are not allowed to leave Islam. Apostasy or irtidad in Islam is equal to treason. Apostasy and the public declaration of rejecting the fundamentals of Islam, has also negative influence on the Muslim society. It must be emphasized that irtidad involves open rejection without any force and with the realization of what one’s statements or actions imply. The punishment prescribed by the shari’a for apostasy is death. “Murtad” means apostate. Murtad can be of two types: fitri and milli.
A former kafir who becomes a Muslim and then apostates (Murtad Milli) is given a second chance; if he repents then he is not to be killed.

But one who is born as a Muslim and then apostates (Murtad Fitri) he is to be killed even if he repents. His repentance might be accepted by Allah but he still has to go through the punishment prescribed for his treason in this world.

This punishment is only applicable in case of apostasy by men; in case of women the punishment is not death but life imprisonment. And if such a woman repents, then her repentance is accepted and the punishment is suspended. http://www.peacefaq.com/apostacy.html

Dhimmitude: the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word “dhimmitude” as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye’or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word “dhimmitude” comes from dhimmi, an Arabic word meaning “protected”.

The dhimmi agrees to live in a world that is dominated by Islam in all public areas. A dhimmi is free from Islam only in his own home. Law, customs, art, education, the media, government, speech and every thing in public space is Islamic. In addition, the dhimmi has to pay a tax to Islam called the jizya tax. In Khaybar of Mohammad’s day the jizya tax was 50%.
The key psychological technique is that the dhimmi is to be humiliated in all possible ways. In effect, the dhimmi is halfway between freedom and slavery, a semi-slave. What happened over time was that the dhimmis converted to Islam. It was easier to avoid all this pain and become a Muslim.

In the 20th century, Islam became so weak that the full dhimmi status was dropped. But if you meet and talk to Christians from the Middle East today, you will find that the centuries of dhimmitude have produced, in many cases, a personality similar to an abused wife.
There is another kind of dhimmi—kafirs who become apologists for Islam, fear and defer to it. So we have two types of dhimmi—the subjugated dhimmi who is under the political power of Islam and the apologist dhimmi who seeks Islamic favor.

It is Islam that demands that Muslims write the “official” history of Islam that will be taught in the kafir schools. But it is an ignorant textbook committee of dhimmis that say, “Yes, only Muslims can write the official version.” So our history courses never report the disaster of the loss of kafir culture in North Africa, the Middle East, Turkey and Hindustan. It is the dhimmis who decide the history, Islamic studies and Middle East departments and pass on lies as truth. It is a dhimmi government of America who has decided to base all of its policies on what the imam says Whatever Islam wants, the school board, textbook committee, zoning board, politician, educator, and media reporter gives them in order to be seen as tolerant.

Dhimmis roll over for all Islamic demands on our civilization. Dhimmis are aiding and abetting implementation of Sharia inch by inch. We are losing the war of annihilation due to the dhimmis, not the Muslims. It is not that Islam is so strong, but that we are so weak. We are weak because we are ignorant.

What are the women in a society to do when women outnumber men? The last US Census said there are 85.6 single men for every 100 single women.

If Western governments cared enough for their citizens they would legalize and promote polygyny because when women outnumber men in a society and polygyny is banned it leads to decadence, corruption, high divorce rates etc. Most married women would never resort to prostitution and pornography and the likes. It is when women outnumber men and polygyny is banned do these evils become manifest in a society, because these women have no other choice.

Serial monogamy is not the solution to your problem, polygyny is.

So if Western gov’ts don’t legalize polygyny what choice is left for these women?
1. Continue to live debauched or lonely lives.
2. Become Muslims and marry polygynously in a honorable manner.

BTW, LDS has also banned polygyny. Only the FLDS allow it and there are only about 10,000 of them in the world. There are about 500 million Shi’ah in the world.

For permanent marriage justice and equality between wives is a requirement. However in fixed-term marriage (Mut’ah) that all depends on the conditions of the marriage contract. Mut’ah is a flexible/customizable marriage contract which can be tailored to fit the needs of almost anybody.

So, lol, if you want women, hey the Muslim world has a surplus. The only catch is you have to become muslim first. Our women usually have no problem with polygyny so long as you follow the rules.