Everyone likes to vent their views online and I’m sure that it has its merits. However, if you really want your voice to be heard, you should call or write your Congressmen. Yes, that sounds useless but it actually isn’t.

Viewpoints expressed in calls, letters, faxes and emails are tallied by the staff aides. Each pro or con communication represents about 1,000 voters. For instance, if an official receives 20 letters against an issue and none representing the other side, then he assumes that the twenty letters represents 20,000 voters who are interested enough in the issue to take a stand and this does carry a lot of weight!

This is why grassroots organizations can often grab the ear of a politician. If, nationwide, a large number of zealous individuals stand behind a cause, you can be assured that your point of view will be considered.

For this reason its important that when you care deeply about something, let your voice be heard publicly through organizations or privately through your own communication.

P.S. In a revolution, I would be one of the first to sign on.

Others, like Saul A., etc -
“…when I turn 25 or 35..” – that says it all. Some of you young folks literally know nothing about what is going on. Is it any wonder when you, like Mikey et al, are products of schools with teachers who cannot read, spell, think, write, or count? What do you have to say that we should pay any attention to, at all?

The situation today is unlike any in history. It resembles the 1750-1770’s, except that communication and missiles are instantaneous. Various parts of our society are inter-dependent to a degree that is unprecedented. The far left has seized control of our government and is rapidly dispensing with any pretense of following the Constitution; the world’s economies are teetering. In short, the situation is highly unstable.

For all those who fantasize that conservatives don’t engage in revolutions (of course that would be an opinion fostered by our supremely ignorant educational establishment), the American revolution was just such a one. It was also grounded in religious faith – a matter of some inconvenience to today’s atheists who pretend to see their beliefs expressed somehow in our early documents.

jrc

“They have us surrounded Chuck, poor bastards.” — NWMA

They REALLY have no idea of what they are up against.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[God is in control. -- Twilla Paris, and a host of old and new prophets]

There will be a warm wet feeling entering your ear that smells like urine.

How will we detect them?

The person causing it will try to tell you that it’s raining!

Long live the Rushvolution!

They have us surrounded Chuck, poor bastards.

Of late I’ve noticed a number of articles here and there on how the ‘rich’ are being wined and dined in the Obama White House.

This strikes me as ‘odd’, considering how during the campaign, The One declared he was going to ‘redistribute wealth’ and that the ‘rich’ were likely to be people who had their wealth redistributed.

So why are the ‘rich’ all trotting to the White House and why is The One treating them so well?

Is it possible that the ‘rich’ are trying to buy their way out of harm’s way? And that The One is accepting their bribes?

If that is the case, who then will be targeted for having their wealth redistributed? The only other group I can think of are the ‘Middle Class’. The latter-day ‘kulaks’.

And this ties into the possible scenario I was discussing earlier in this thread. See item #12 in this thread. Go ahead and re-read it. I’ll wait……..

The point here is that if the ‘rich’ become the ‘commissars’ in this ‘new order’, and the poor are always with US. The only people to be fleeced are the middle class. Which parallels what happened in Russia in the first decade and a half of the Soviet regime. It also ties in well with Ayers pogrom to ‘re-educate’ the unwilling ‘kulaks’. Just as Stalin did in 1930-31.

What will be the indicators that this is what is going on?

How will we detect them?

And if it IS what is happening, how do we avoid the fate of the Russian kulaks of the 1920s and ’30s?

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[History repeats itself. Especially if you're unethical, have power and have seen it work before. -- CBPelto]

Its very true I love having debates with ppl like college professors — robotech master

I had a similar opportunity with a PC government official in the presence of a university rep, a community college rep, both school board presidents and a host of other representatives at a community-government oversight commission last Thursday.

This particular person was spouting off how anyone who comes to the table about Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Programs (APPP) has to have scientific evidence to back up their claims. The discussion was about which programs work best, including their most hated form Abstinence.

Oddly enough, during the Q&A period after the initial presentation, it came out that they have no statistics of their own favored programs efficacy. That’s when I jumped in with both feet.

All this woman is doing is ‘it makes me feel good’ stuff without any idea as to whether or not it works. And she’s taking HER ‘cut’ of all that money passing through her hands. And yet she insists that everyone else MUST provide scientific data as to their programs’ effectiveness.

Talk about latter day Pharisees…..

The various educational institution reps, who had jumped on me when I challenged an anecdotal report from another party about abstinence, were VERY quiet when it came to the presenter’s lack of any data.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Research is a bowl of merde and statistics is the spoon.]

Anything you say can and will be misinterpeted and used against you. Just as you would select a target at the range, choose your words carefully. Once fired, you own them, forever. — NWMA

But let us not take council of our fears vis-a-vis saying what is right.

We know these bat-rastards will lie in the first place. Usually taking things said out of context, as Marueen Dowd does using ellipsis.

Therefore, I suggest that when you make some pity statement, that you capture the page on which it was said in order to have a record of the truth with which you can beat some cretin over the head with in the public venue, if they are stupid enough to do such a thing.

RE: robotech master’s MIAC Report Item

Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties. — robotech master

It’s likely that it won’t stop with those groups. We have the incident in Texas reporter earlier this month about someone being pulled over for a homemade anti-abortion sign in their vehicle rear window.

The key thing is to keep track of such incidents to see if there is a growing pattern of behavior. If there is, it is a key indicator that things are going ’south’.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Be Prepared. -- Boy Scout credo]

P.S. But also be well informed….

Anything you say can and will be misinterpeted and used against you. Just as you would select a target at the range, choose your words carefully. Once fired, you own them, forever. It’s always better to encourage everyone to play nicely. cedarford is a liberl hack who jumps in and out of converstations sometimes posing as a ‘moderate’. I called him a traitor, it sort of summed it up in one word rather nicely I thought.

The MIAC report specifically describes supporters of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as “militia” influenced terrorists and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties.