Email This to a Friend

* Your name:

* Your email address:

* Your friend's name:

* Your friend's email address:

Message:

* Required Fields

Could Hollywood Slump Provide Opening for Conservatives?

The Depression inspired a wave of patriotic films. History might just repeat itself.

February 26, 2009 - by Pam Meister
Page 1 of 2  Next ->

When General Electric’s CEO declined to accept a $12 million bonus — on top of his $3 million base pay — a friend sent me the headline and snarked, “What will he and his family live on?” My reply was, “But what would people be saying if he didn’t decline the bonus?” Damned if you do; damned if you don’t.

Yet my turn for a similar sense of schadenfreude arrived when I read this, courtesy of the New York Post’s Page Six:

Hollywood stars are starting to feel the economic pinch. “Salaries are being cut. Unless you’re Will Smith, you are not going to get $20 million a movie anymore,” said an insider. To make matters more meager, “back-end” deals — where a star or big-name director would get a cut of the gross — “are dead. Those deals are not being offered to anyone. Not [even] Steven Spielberg. It’s, ‘Here’s your salary and go home.’ There is no negotiation between stars and the movie studios anymore. The studios make an offer. If the star says no, the studio says, ‘We’ll find someone else.’”

I guess there’s a little bit of class envy in all of us. But is it really class envy in this case? While I might envy some celebrities their fame and fortune, I have no real problem with them making gazillions of dollars whilst churning out what some believe is worthless entertainment. As long as the market will bear it, they’ll make the cashola. That’s how capitalism works. Right now, the economy is in a downturn and everyone’s feeling the pinch — even über-wealthy celebrities whose livelihoods depend on how the little people are doing financially, whether they like to admit it or not.

We all have to make sacrifices. I’m not getting a raise this year either and I rather doubt Steven Spielberg feels sorry for me.

Maybe if there hadn’t been so many movies in recent years created by a bunch of fair-weather patriots that practically screamed “America sucks” and watered our culture down to the lowest common denominator, I might feel a little bit more empathy for their plight. But it’s not just the economy that’s working against them. My friend Aaron hit the nail on the head in an email on this topic:

Normally the movie industry would be blowing up right now because it’s (relatively) cheap (matinee is still 5-7 dollars) and we always hear the talking heads say that consumers like movies during hard times because they enjoy escaping from their normal lives.

I don’t think this will be the case and I don’t think star power is a big draw anymore. People just don’t like any of them anymore.

I just feel bad for all the Republican people who work on the other side of the camera in Hollywood that will be hurt because of the likes of Tim Robbins’ brilliant political insight and the marvel of Cameron Diaz and how women in this country did not get sent to rape camps in the dungeons of bible camps and mega churches after Dubya’s reelection.

Page 1 of 2  Next ->

Pam Meister is the editor for Family Security Matters and a contributor to Big Hollywood. Her work can also be seen at American Thinker. The views expressed here are her own.

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

25 Comments

1. John the Libertarian:

This is bigoted and narrow-minded. Track the top-grossing films of last year, or any year, and you’ll find solid conservative values.

Feb 26, 2009 - 7:32 am 2. Phoenix48:

‘Are we up to the task?’ It’s a very important question Pam. Breitbart’s success with Big Hollywood proves his basic premise – that until conservatives recognize promoting pro-American values by participation liberals will continue to rule culture by fiat and inertia. Spend some time on the site and it’s pretty uplifting. There is a lot of folks who want to ressurect Frank Capra & George Stevens brand of Americana – and end-run Hollyweirds monopoly on nihilistic crap.

Feb 26, 2009 - 7:57 am 3. rocketeer:

It would be fine if Hollywood responded to the viewers of these films by producing movies that they want to see. The highest grossing films typically tend to be the ones that have some sort of family values or that are generally positive about things. The problem, as I see it, is not that Hollywood doesn’t understand what films make money, but that they have an agenda that they want to put out there, and that trumps their desire to make the money.

I do agree, that it is up to conservatives to get in the fight and start to engage in the battle for the social culture. We’re going to need some big $$ people to get the idea and start their own pictures. Directors like Mel Gibson are a prime example of this. When no one in Hollywood would consider “The Passion” as a project, he funded it and produced it himself. Hollywood producers knew this movie would be a financial giant, but their agenda came first. Can’t be show Christians in any sort of positive light, or try to film something religious unless you’re bashing the religion.

Feb 26, 2009 - 8:01 am 4. Gordon:

I really do not see how the reversal of nearly four decades is going to be swept away with a few years of poor box offices.

Feb 26, 2009 - 8:05 am 5. Craig:

“The Depression inspired a wave of patriotic films. History might just repeat itself.”

I applaud your wishful thinking….but I seriously doubt it.

Feb 26, 2009 - 8:24 am 6. Michael Mandaville:

Hollywood studios and other companies (distribution, production, etc.,) have overhead, are freaking out about the growing Do It Yourself Distribution like Digital downloads, Createspace, etc., Film companies will go the way of Nuevo Yorko Tiempo (NYT recently purchased by a Mexican billionaire) and into massive decline due to the internet. Here’s where conservative need to step up. They need to see the economic model on low budget films distributed to niche audience that can realize a profit and make money.

Progressive Socialists (never just say progressive!) know that you must Capture the Culture. That’s what they’ve been doing for years. Capital plus creativity and new distribution methods can break up this pathetic monopoly and will.

Taking Action is what counts.
Michael
Author
“Citizen Soldier Handbook: 101 Ways For Every American To Fight Terrorism”
http://www.CitizenSoldierHandbook.com

Feb 26, 2009 - 8:34 am 7. Spark22:

Looking on Google, Ayan Rand’s Atlas Shrugged is supposedly in the works, and scheduled for release in 2011… seems to be on hold, but I wonder if the story of capitalism and the obvious negative impact of socialism will make it to the theaters during a time when our own president appears to be making ‘fair’ decisions, parrellel to the stories in the book?

I would love to see the production of a good conservative movie that supports traditional American ideals and how they really do still exist, despite the imagery of poverty, doom and gloom, wicked power/money, and the end of the world, as the USA is portrayed by the MSM and Hollywood.

Feb 26, 2009 - 8:43 am 8. rammingspeed:

Hollywood began in earnest it’s palpable leftward trip during the fabulous 1960’s, when the American version of The Enlightenment began (sarcasm). You know, the trippy dippy hippies being informed by the newly existentialist Beatles, etc.

It’s gone downhill from there, to the point where the most important films, from the Hollywood insider’s point of view, ARE the ones that bash America and capitalism and all that. These filmmakers are doing what Karl Marx exhorted the artists of his time to do…create socialist realism, whereby they can indoctrinate the masses.

Sorry, despite the current threat to democracy by the dominate Democratic Party, this is still a free country. And people won’t buy that crap.

Feb 26, 2009 - 11:00 am 9. anonguy:

What films support my values? I haven’t seen much. For the most part, I’d rather have films that don’t mock my values, which is a better distinction.

Going to movies solely for values is a bit boring. It’s like assigned reading or eating vegetables. I like to be entertained. Even this is tough for Hollywood. They rather make preachy leftwing propaganda than non-threatening money making wholesome entertainment. SHAME.

Feb 26, 2009 - 12:48 pm 10. Alex:

I was watching Star Wars (the 1977 one) and realized that not only did I still like it it and it’s two sequels are one of the few films I can watch again. As for todays films, they’re not greatly inspired, though greatly insipid. Yes, they have those based on comic books, which means I’d rather read comic books than go to the movies. But I really realized that the movie industry is still policitically in the 1970s, in a lot of ways anyway.

Look at what happened to them after 9/11, they couldn’t handle it, they didn’t know what to think. THe best they could do was do a ‘documentry’ about how the United States is supposed to be the country with the highest murder rate (which we don’t have)and said nothing when that Dutch filmmaker was murdered, quite brutally I may add. It’s sad, because it destroys any illusion that they had any guts.

Man, films are so boring now.

Feb 26, 2009 - 1:26 pm 11. Gail:

I feel like I did my part in the last year. I can’t remember the titles, but I saw the movie that spoofs Michael Moore and the one where Owen Wilson bought the house with the image of Jesus in the stucco. But those didn’t turn out to be blockbusters.

Feb 26, 2009 - 2:31 pm 12. Cato:

“It’s up to us, the movie-going public, to support the films that reflect our values.
Are we up to the task?”

Short answer: No.

Just look at how “An American Carol” did at the box office, which was poorly. Sure, it wasn’t a masterpiece, but it was the most conservative, pro-American comedy probably ever made, and had the David Zucker (Airplane!, Naked Gun) humorous stamp on it, and even an impressive cast (Kelsey Grammer, Dennis Hopper, Leslie Nielson, etc.).

This movie wasn’t like “eating vegetables,” it was funny and entertaining. And they advertised it ad naseum on Fox News. Every conservative in America should have gone to see that movie. But they didn’t. And it is going to be a looong time before anybody steps up to fund another project like it.

Feb 26, 2009 - 4:34 pm 13. huxley:

I saw “American Carol” on DVD and I wanted to like it, but aside from the Jon Voight segments, it was truly wretched.

Feb 26, 2009 - 5:40 pm 14. Richard:

I wouldn’t see a premier movie, if a Hollywood actor(guffaw) paid me to see one. I hope their box office plummets through the mantle of the earth and they all have to become the car sales persons. For Chrysler.
Sincerely

Feb 26, 2009 - 5:47 pm 15. kywrite:

Gran Torino. See it, if you really want to support old fashioned American values: self-reliance, independence, self-sacrifice, and a kind of real nobility. Learning to tolerate one’s neighbors, no matter how different or how disposed you are to dislike them. Understanding that racism exists on both sides. Plus it’s a great movie.

But I also noticed it was nominated for zip at the Academy Awards. It should have been.

Feb 27, 2009 - 4:07 am 16. RobertS:

Is it just me, or is television (cable, in particular) not responding with fare that is more watchable than what we are offered by the traditional movie industry? “The Closer,” “Burn Notice,” “Monk,” -even the comedy “Psych.” These shows all portray good guys versus bad guys – and the good guys come out ahead. And there is a lightness about them that doesn’t dpress the viewer. We don’t go to the movies at all any more. (Too expensive and insulting to our values) – but there seems to be a growing number of entertaining TV shows to watch.

Feb 27, 2009 - 7:35 am 17. rachel:

I don’t even go to the movies anymore…not for a long time. I don’t care for the culture of Hollywood and refuse to contribute a dime of mine to the dumbing down and/or the amoralizing of America. They can all go straight to hell as far as I am concerned.

Feb 27, 2009 - 4:53 pm 18. Gail S:

Great article and great comments. Like the other Gail posting here, I also saw “An American Carol” and “Marley and Me”, no others.

I used to buy a lot of DVD’s, but have stopped. In fact I’m boycotting everything liberal. I used to have all windmill generated electricity, and paid the premium price because I believe in pursuing all energy sources. But after Pelosi refused to allow the American Energy Act to come to the floor for a vote in July, I switched to cheaper standard, fossil fuel energy. Next year, I will not buy season tickets for the theater. Nothing liberal, not a cent. I will be contributing to every conservative and/or Republican candidate running for State Governor, or national office. That is where my extra money and entertainment dollars will go. When I feel that our government is in American hands again, I will resume entertainment…but not the anti-American ka-ka that Hollywood has been foisting off on us for decades.

Maybe I will buy a new copy of Atlas Shrugged.

Best regards to all,

Feb 27, 2009 - 9:15 pm 19. anonguy:

I’m sorry… “An American Carol” is the equivalent of eating vegetables. It’s a transparent political satire with a “Roger Moore” type as the protagonist. I don’t want to see this with my limited time and funds.

I also question the bashing of Mr. Moore, which is not my conservative value. I’d rather ignore him in my entertainment since he is plainly a demagogue.

Feb 28, 2009 - 9:46 am 20. Barbara:

Remember when Disney meant wholesome family entertainment? Not any more.
John Wayne you knew what it was before entering the theater.

I miss those day. Last move I was was Marley and Me. It was over ten years before that.
I hate going to the theaters, the surround a sound is way to high and I leave with a horrible headache.

Feb 28, 2009 - 10:53 am 21. Seerak:

Maybe I will buy a new copy of Atlas Shrugged.

You may have to hunt a bit for your copy, as “Atlas” is selling like ammunition these days.

Does anyone remember what was done to “Starship Troopers”? I’m hoping “Atlas” doesn’t get made by the current rights holders; I have every reason to believe they will screw it up. It’s only a question of whether it will be done from incompetence, or malice.

Feb 28, 2009 - 11:06 am 22. G Alston:

Wierd, I just read in the paper that movie attendance is way up for the winter period, just like the depression years. And the boxofficemojo site seems to corroborate. Who knew?

So much for your premise, Pam. Tough to beat actual data with mere opinion.

Feb 28, 2009 - 4:59 pm 23. RAP:

Hollywood made patriotic movies in the 30’s. Really. Hollywood was riddled with Communists in the 30’s. The patriotic movies they made were intended to drag the U.S. into the fight against Fascism and save Stalin’s butt.

Mar 1, 2009 - 12:15 am 24. Dave D:

It will only provide an opening if they don’t suck. Propaganda is propaganda, be it conservative or liberal. We need less of it and more good films, period.

Mar 1, 2009 - 8:25 pm 25. David S:

Your friend is wrong, as attendance is up at theaters.

Conservative movies don’t do well, which is why you see so few of them.

Peace.

DS

Mar 2, 2009 - 12:13 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: