Comments on: Criticizing Michelle Obama: Fair or Foul?

By: Pajamas Media » Michelle Obama and the New Face of Feminism

Pajamas Media » Michelle Obama and the New Face of Feminism — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:05:02 +0000

[...] struck many, including myself, as racist. Her belligerent style drew so much flak, in fact, that Barack told the press to lay off of her. Pages: [...]

By: Pajamas Media » If Michelle Obama Isn’t Racist, What Is She?

Pajamas Media » If Michelle Obama Isn’t Racist, What Is She? — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:17:40 +0000

[...] on stump speeches to talk about how surprising it is that white people in Iowa would vote for him – isn’t fair game. [...]

By: B from Bloomington

B from Bloomington — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:05:45 +0000

Ha ha ha ha ha!!!! This guy REALLY is funny, or incredibly naive. Did he think he could make a run for president and not have people tossing onions at his family? Come on. I remember when President Clinton was elected and the media was downright mean to them all, even (at that time) little Chelsea, until his wife put a stop to it. Hillary stood up for her child and said that she and her husband were fair game, but her child was off limits. Also, what was the Special Council doing for the entire 8 years of the Clinton presidency… looking in every nook and cranny that spanned both President Clinton and his wife’s personal and professional lives going back decades. Why does Obama expect it should be any different for him and his family? Oh, I forgot…. just because…. ????? Get real fella.

By: Richard

Richard — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:05:18 +0000

Hey Spook…., that’s a spooky thought. Tupperware or sex toy parties?
My money (what’s left in America) is on the latter.

By: Spooky

Spooky — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:20:59 +0000

Once she began to campaign for her husband, she became fair game. By the way it would be interesting if Obama and Hillary ran and won, we would have four presidents, Barack, Hillary, Bill and Michelle.

By: Richard

Richard — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:37:01 +0000

The paradigm changed with the Clintons. Oral sex isn’t sex. What’s the meaning of “is”. She was in effect co-prez remember? Executing national legislation a la “free health care”. Now, her aspirations and ambitions are made evident, albeit poorly executed. The days of a woman being a man’s silent partner in America’s highest office are gone. Irreversibly gone.
Is that loud-mouth America hating witch fair game? You bet your ass. It’ll be her policies domestically we’ll see if Barry Wingnut Obama is elected.
Bank on it, just not in America. They’re coming for your money here.

By: Janis

Janis — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:08:46 +0000

If candidates wives are fair game because it says something about the candidate, what about Cindy McCain stealing illegal prescriptions for drugs from her fammily charity and the getting a slap on the wrist when she was caught instead of doing any time? What does that say about her actions, rather than just Michelle’s words? And how would you treat it if it were Michelle who had stolen drugs instead of Cindy?

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:02:59 +0000

I’ve got some old news here: in the USA today , race trumps ALL. Obama’s policies must not be questioned , lest you be branded a racist by Pinchy and the Old York Times. Obama’s race indemnifies him against all wrongdoing. The East Coast, guilty white liberals deem it so. Any who disagree with them must be labeled racist, white trash, ignorant, savages fit only to pay taxes to support those who despise them.

By: Sue

Sue — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:08:01 +0000

I marched for Women’s Rights before it was chic to do so. But, every woman I knew also knew a truth most MSM wouldn’t talk about then, since or now: the “queen” bee syndrome. This was a female who would use any wile she could, lie, cheat or steal to get ahead. She denigrated other women for her own success. Sound familiar? Hillary and Michelle have nothing on each other because they are both queen bees.

By: Barbara

Barbara — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:53:24 +0000

Burt, as ususal, great article. I find I am always agreeing with you. Michelle may be more radical than her husband and/or has a harder time concealing her racism and marxism than him. But they both think the same. It doesn’t take a genius to see what he’s about. He is the company he keeps. His closest company is his wife, who deserves to be “attacked”. When you say things like she has, what would a person with a brain expect?