I thank you very much for the two book references, too.

This subject is fascinating and deserves in-depth study.

Although I´m a foreigner (Brazil), born in 1967, it gets more and more evident to me that the American Left has been undermining American Sovereignty since Alger Hiss, with the Democratic Party (and its media, academe and show business fellow travellers) doing it overtly (for those with eyes to see) since the Carter Administration.

For all those who rejoice at the fall of Nixon, I beg you to remember the millions of innocent lives snuffed out in its wake after the Democratic Congress unplugged South Vietnam in 1975.

Sounds like a candidate for the Order of Lenin to me. As founder of the Raleigh Spy Conference (www.raleighspyconference.com)I feel qualified to espouse this view.

I think the party will be grateful to accept. Vietnam was a proxy war. The soviet regime pumped billions that they needed for developing their economy and growing food into war materiel that US forces destroyed, time and again. Their economic engine wasn’t up to the task. Ours was. (We capitalist pigs have an economic advantage by definition, apparently.)Vietnam helped take down the soviets via attrition.

You’re welcome.

It was known that the democrats were cheating to the point of
usurping elections: stuffing ballot boxes, fake registrations, and so on. Nixon was trying to determine whether or not this was a “secret” (known) directive of the DNC or whether this was local problems (e.g. the Daly machine.) He “lost” to Kennedy in 1960 due to this. This is what Watergate was.

It was indeed moral for Nixon to investigate, and he knew for certain that the FBI wouldn’t be of any help. Had Kennedy flaked in the Cuban missile crisis and allowed us to get nuked as the result of an illegal election, I’m sure that the proper moral imperative should be obvious.

The trouble with morons like you is that you think anyone who disagrees with you, ipso facto, supports genocide. Don’t pretend to know my political leanings. Many MANY rational republicans have no problem admitting Nixon was a bad person. And, they aren’t so petty and defensive that they have to make wild, unfounded accusations.

Nice work exposing your ignorance though. Fools have a way to being unable to hide it.

But the Democrats and the news media had a vendetta against him that was as bad or worse than the onw they have against GWB.

I still think that the world would have been a much better place if Nixon had won the 1960 election. Bay of Pigs, Vienna Summit, Berlin Wall, Cuban Missile Crisis, and, of couse, Vietnam, all would have been handled differently if they had occurred at all. Kruschev didn’t think Nixon was some lightweight frat boy whose daddy bought him the election.

Were Felt a hero, could have done what others have suggested above: resigned and gone public.
He didnt and from that lack alone I suggest he was a craven, partisan coward–good riddance.

Baloney. It was because Democrats had conspired with Ellsberg to release classified information, which makes them spies and traitors.

Naturally, they aren’t going to bring that up in their phony impeachment proceedings.

“He was a crook and a liar.”

Yeah, that’s what the Democrats and their friends in the media and schools want everyone to believe. They’ve been propagandizing everyone for decades.

It’s worked pretty good too.