<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI Chief Faces Pakistani Pandora&#8217;s Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:06:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meryl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-220333</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-220333</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t obama just ask the terrorists to sign their names to some list or something and turn it in to him? 

He just loves to talk with our enemies and he promised last fall that once he was elected he would talk to them and everything would be alllllllllllll better.

He can give them his Blackberry contact info, so they don&#039;t have to be embarrassed by going through a third party or anything. I know he doesn&#039;t like all that diplomatic crap and how it complicates things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t obama just ask the terrorists to sign their names to some list or something and turn it in to him? </p>
<p>He just loves to talk with our enemies and he promised last fall that once he was elected he would talk to them and everything would be alllllllllllll better.</p>
<p>He can give them his Blackberry contact info, so they don&#8217;t have to be embarrassed by going through a third party or anything. I know he doesn&#8217;t like all that diplomatic crap and how it complicates things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leatherneck</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-220010</link>
		<dc:creator>Leatherneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-220010</guid>
		<description>Just check the Mosques, their phones, and computers. Any terror related information found, and the Mosque should be destroyed with the American flag flying high over the rubble for the world to see. For starters.

How many Islamic examples do you need? Read Robert Spenser&#039;s latest book as a field guide.

ROPMA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just check the Mosques, their phones, and computers. Any terror related information found, and the Mosque should be destroyed with the American flag flying high over the rubble for the world to see. For starters.</p>
<p>How many Islamic examples do you need? Read Robert Spenser&#8217;s latest book as a field guide.</p>
<p>ROPMA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinfoilhatter</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-219919</link>
		<dc:creator>tinfoilhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-219919</guid>
		<description>&quot;3. Broadsword:
 

This,” …carnage can be wrought by a low-tech attack in a major urban city”,of course, will never happen because there are 22,000 commonsense gun laws in this country which will prevent it.&quot;

The real first responders should be an armed citizentry.  While many, undoubtably, would still be  killed in such an attack (even by responding forces blue-on-blue,) they would

1) be highly tactically disruptive to the attackers.  Disrupted attack timelines and the potential splitting of supporting pairs, for example, would give the responding police a huge tactical advantage.

2) have at least a fighting chance to survive, especially if they could create defensive &quot;hedgehogs&quot; that the attackers would bypass seeking softer targets.

3) be in a position to immediately augment security forces with trained (and more importantly) vetted personnel, in some kind of &quot;Home Guard&quot; organization, such is found in Denmark.

Instead, our &quot;first responders&quot; to Mumbai-style attack will be stuck in the resulting traffic made indescribably worse by panic, setting up checkpoints and roadblocks, all while attempting to cobble together an on the fly some response.  The police, especially in major Eastern cities are miserably trained and underequipped for a Mumbai-type attack (specifically hampered by a lack of rifles and good fire team training, mostly for political &quot;scary guns are icky!&quot; and financial reasons.

Setting up a real &quot;Home Guard&quot; tips too many rice bowls to politically viable, and most Americans are too passive to take more than &quot;glance at the DHS Threat level&quot; approach to security.

Also, don&#039;t think the next Mumbai is going to be guys with SATphones, AKs, and the occasional IED.  There are off-the-shelf things they could bring in a rucksack that would cripple the response to their attack.  I&#039;m sure their thinking of it now.  They learn, we learn.  Or at least we should learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;3. Broadsword:</p>
<p>This,” …carnage can be wrought by a low-tech attack in a major urban city”,of course, will never happen because there are 22,000 commonsense gun laws in this country which will prevent it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The real first responders should be an armed citizentry.  While many, undoubtably, would still be  killed in such an attack (even by responding forces blue-on-blue,) they would</p>
<p>1) be highly tactically disruptive to the attackers.  Disrupted attack timelines and the potential splitting of supporting pairs, for example, would give the responding police a huge tactical advantage.</p>
<p>2) have at least a fighting chance to survive, especially if they could create defensive &#8220;hedgehogs&#8221; that the attackers would bypass seeking softer targets.</p>
<p>3) be in a position to immediately augment security forces with trained (and more importantly) vetted personnel, in some kind of &#8220;Home Guard&#8221; organization, such is found in Denmark.</p>
<p>Instead, our &#8220;first responders&#8221; to Mumbai-style attack will be stuck in the resulting traffic made indescribably worse by panic, setting up checkpoints and roadblocks, all while attempting to cobble together an on the fly some response.  The police, especially in major Eastern cities are miserably trained and underequipped for a Mumbai-type attack (specifically hampered by a lack of rifles and good fire team training, mostly for political &#8220;scary guns are icky!&#8221; and financial reasons.</p>
<p>Setting up a real &#8220;Home Guard&#8221; tips too many rice bowls to politically viable, and most Americans are too passive to take more than &#8220;glance at the DHS Threat level&#8221; approach to security.</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t think the next Mumbai is going to be guys with SATphones, AKs, and the occasional IED.  There are off-the-shelf things they could bring in a rucksack that would cripple the response to their attack.  I&#8217;m sure their thinking of it now.  They learn, we learn.  Or at least we should learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadsword</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-219900</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-219900</guid>
		<description>Chido, the Irish were not terrorists but &#039;gunmen&#039;.  Or were they &#039;militants&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chido, the Irish were not terrorists but &#8216;gunmen&#8217;.  Or were they &#8216;militants&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadsword</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-219897</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-219897</guid>
		<description>This,&quot; ...carnage can be wrought by a low-tech attack in a major urban city&quot;,of course, will never happen because there are 22,000 commonsense gun laws in this country which will prevent it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This,&#8221; &#8230;carnage can be wrought by a low-tech attack in a major urban city&#8221;,of course, will never happen because there are 22,000 commonsense gun laws in this country which will prevent it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canuck</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-219866</link>
		<dc:creator>canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-219866</guid>
		<description>The solution is the same here or for the Brits...shut down immigration and deport all non-citizens of Pakistan and any other &quot;moslem&quot; country.  Any cooperation we get from the ISI is going to be superficial and more for show than any serious effort to help us out.

Interestingly enough, the principal reason we have a federal government is to protect us at home.  The want to do everything else but do that...our Southern border is porous and our immigration policies suck all in the name of diversity.  I don&#039;t remember diversity in the Constitution and I didn&#039;t get to vote on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is the same here or for the Brits&#8230;shut down immigration and deport all non-citizens of Pakistan and any other &#8220;moslem&#8221; country.  Any cooperation we get from the ISI is going to be superficial and more for show than any serious effort to help us out.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the principal reason we have a federal government is to protect us at home.  The want to do everything else but do that&#8230;our Southern border is porous and our immigration policies suck all in the name of diversity.  I don&#8217;t remember diversity in the Constitution and I didn&#8217;t get to vote on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chido</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/fbi-chief-faces-pakistani-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-219851</link>
		<dc:creator>Chido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=49449#comment-219851</guid>
		<description>The author is simply wrong when she says &#039;every terrorist incident in the UK has been linked to British residents of Pakistani descent&#039; and is exposing her ignorance. There have been Irish terrorist attacks on Britain this century i.e. the Ealing bombing of 2001 as well as bombing conducted by &#039;white supremacists&#039; against gays/coloureds e.g. try googling the names of David Copeland and David Tovey in this regard. Astonishing to see that someone who describes themselves as an expert on these mattters can get the facts so wrong unless they have a particular agenda?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author is simply wrong when she says &#8216;every terrorist incident in the UK has been linked to British residents of Pakistani descent&#8217; and is exposing her ignorance. There have been Irish terrorist attacks on Britain this century i.e. the Ealing bombing of 2001 as well as bombing conducted by &#8216;white supremacists&#8217; against gays/coloureds e.g. try googling the names of David Copeland and David Tovey in this regard. Astonishing to see that someone who describes themselves as an expert on these mattters can get the facts so wrong unless they have a particular agenda?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
