OK
feet per mile approx. 5700
times number of miles 670
times inches per meter 12
45828000 inches per 670 miles
divided by
inches per meter 39
divided by minutes
per hour 60
divided by
seconds per meter 60

answer approx. 326.41 meters per second

I think that is close enough.

You totally and intentionally miss the point I make. To you the world is still flat because that’s what you see.

You’re conclusion is interesting, myopic, but interesting. Explain to me why the second explosion is bigger than the first. Try this also, go on to pajama media to “Why we must kill our neighbor” and find the blog by Israeli. It has the bomb hits at the tunnels. Explain to me what those second explosions (which are greater) are.

By the way thank you for calling me a caveman. I’ll accept it along with the other names you folks call me: monkey, son of a monkey, pig,
nazi, racist, baby killer—–and I’m sure you can come up with more.

From my perspective you rate no number after Knights. Maybe you should call yourself Daze.

No thanks; seeing fighter jets fly by is enough.

“Please you’re welcome to try the bullet one as an experiment. If you live through it you can call me a liar.”

No, what you would do is have a brick barrier in between a higher target and the bullet. Than someone shoots the bullet to hit the target above you. That way you can see the bullet hit the target and hear the sound. Then you can come back and answer to a cavemen hell bent on killing.

When I did my calculations it was usually in the form of approximately 332m/s in air. I’d have good faith in your conversion to miles per hour which is completely irrelevant to what I was discussing.

Let me ask another question: how does this answer my question? It doesn’t.

“By the way, you’re still getting weaker. All you come up with is conjecture. If you think I’m making up stuff, look it up. Prove me wrong. I welcome the challenge. Please.”

That’s the thing; your video doesn’t prove anything. There is some lady talking and you have this as proof.

“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwP_LusgPAw”

Again, I see two strikes in that video. Both strikes there is huge debris flying upwards with explosions following the strikes. You have concluded other weapons exploding and I see two bunker busters from an F-15 exploding.

What the hell is that even supposed to mean?

By the way, you’re still getting weaker. All you come up with is conjecture. If you think I’m making up stuff, look it up. Prove me wrong. I welcome the challenge. Please.

Peter the Bubblehead
By golly you came up with another great video. Keep up the good work! I really enjoyed seeing that one.

Well, we all have to go sometime. You have not answered the question.

The person filming could get to the other side to film the trail since the trail would be obvious. Maybe the situation was tense but judging from the ladies body language, that doubtful. All I see is some lady talking about a rocket getting launched from below her. How does she know it was a rocket and not an airstrike without seeing the rocket or its trail and if she could see it from her side what is blocking the camera’s view?

“Watch the video and interpret what you see.”

There is some lady talking. I’m amazed how you measured the distance of the actual explosion from the video. Oh wait; that’s just you making up stuff.

Peter responds: And that’s why the IDF has been posting videos of attacks on buildings where weapons have been fired from (like Mosques, another war crime) and recording secondary explosions from the weapons cache in there blowing up after the primary strike? Because NO ONE stores weapons within easy reach when you’re shooting at an enemy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwP_LusgPAw

That’s like saying we don’t store torpedoes in the torpedo room because that’s where we launch them from.