Germany Does Not Ban Hezbollah TV

Islamist channel Al-Manar has been subjected to a prohibition that does not really prohibit anything.

November 26, 2008 - by John Rosenthal
Page 1 of 2  Next ->

“Germany Bans Hezbollah Television Al-Manar”

Thus ran the headline to a sketchy 200-word AP dispatch that appeared on Friday and that was quickly picked up by other media, both old and new. The alleged news was in fact broken one day earlier by the Jerusalem Post in a more detailed report with the similarly categorical title “Germany Bans Hizbullah Television.” The problem, however, is that if one checks the fine print and if the word “ban” means ban, in the usual sense of the term, then the report is clearly false.

The Jerusalem Post story had the trappings of a real scoop, inasmuch as not only no other English-language media, but, curiously, no German media had previously made mention of any such “ban” of Al-Manar. The origin of the report seems to have been a passing remark by Israeli Public Security Minister Avi Dichter. Visiting Berlin last week to meet with his German counterpart, Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, and queried by the Jerusalem Post as to whether Germany’s notably lax policy toward Hezbollah would be on the agenda, Dichter commented, “I heard they banned Al-Manar.” Contacted by the Jerusalem Post, the German Interior Ministry appeared to confirm the news, saying that Interior Minister Schäuble had indeed “banned” the Beirut-based channel by administrative order on November 11. As reported by the paper, the Ministry spokesperson explained that the ban would “cover Al-Manar advertisements, fundraising for its Beirut studio, and the station’s reception in hotels.” It would not, however, affect the reception of Al-Manar in private homes. “Germany Bans Al-Manar in Hotels” might thus have been a more accurate title.

But even this is not sure. Since Al-Manar is only available in Germany via the, respectively, Egyptian and Saudi satellite networks Nilesat and Arabsat and since these can be presumed not to be the satellite providers of choice for German hotels in any case, the supposed “ban” appears to amount, in effect, to a purely notional ban of nothing at all that was actually occurring. As the German daily Die Welt bizarrely wrote in a short article that, nonetheless, repeated the claim that an order “banning” the channel had in fact been issued: “No interruption of [Al-Manar] broadcasting is to be expected as a result.” The headline on a German website devoted to digital television perhaps best summed up the surreal character of this prohibition that does not prohibit: “Schäuble Bans Al-Manar TV — But Ban Has No Consequences.”

Page 1 of 2  Next ->

John Rosenthal’s writings on European politics and transatlantic relations have appeared in English, French, and German in such leading publications as Policy Review, Les Temps Modernes, and Merkur. He holds a PhD in philosophy and he taught political philosophy and classical German philosophy before turning to journalism. More of his work can be found at Transatlantic Intelligencer.

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

6 Comments

1. Irish Alex:

Germany turning a blind eye to an organisation that wants to kill jews? Why that’s unprecedented! I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.

Nov 26, 2008 - 4:51 am 2. Arthur:

I do not agree with the banning of media it is very anti-American to do so. So yes that was Germany, but still it is probably good if Germany really did not ban anything at all. why be like the Castro or Chavez or Iran? why not be free and open society where there is really real free speech? Free speech has no meaning unless it applies equally to the people you disagree with. one of the things i enjoy about this site, is that people can comment about things, even if the comments are absurd or well thought out they seem to be freely posted. i think that is good way to do thing; crack-pots are petty quickly seen for what they are. when you ban something you only make it stronger and give it an undeserved legitimacy.

Nov 26, 2008 - 2:35 pm 3. WestGuard:

Lebanon itself should ban hezbollah tv. Why be nice or fair and give terrorists a soapbox to poison young minds with. Heck, the Lebanese army should have helped the Israeli military hunt down and destroy hezbollah for instigating a fight and dragging a nasty and avoidable war to Lebanon.
Hezbolah is large and well armed enough to be a serious military threat to their own government if they chose to. Hezbollah should be disarmed, disbanded and disowned.
Banning Hezbollah tv in Western countries should be a given, and applauded loudly!

Nov 26, 2008 - 8:43 pm 4. Steynian 291 « Free Canuckistan!:

[...] SELLING OURSELVES OUT: Sanctions? What Sanctions? German-Iranian Trade Booms; Germany Does Not Ban Hezbollah TV …. [...]

Nov 28, 2008 - 8:41 am 5. jonesy55:

So Germany has refused to trample on freedom of speech in the media? Is this a problem? Are the ideas of Hezbollah so alluring that reasoned debate in an open society cannot win against them?

If the free nations of the world adopt the same repressive techniques as those who would want to defeat us, what is left to fight for?

Nov 28, 2008 - 9:42 am 6. Someone75:

Jonesy55:

Yes! I agree. Thank you for having some perspective.

Nov 29, 2008 - 8:00 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: