As far as his “Anonymous” signiture I have no problem with it. I do believe that repercussions can and quite probably will occur to those who take a stand.

But your comment on gun ownership is interesting- given that Obama can simply track your IP address, read your emails, tap your phone, throw you into a black site prison, without charges, without even giving you a right to file a habeas corpus motion to protest your innocence, and do all of this legally…

you STILL think that your gun rights are worth a damn?

Maybe we should be as vigilant about the other 9 Amendments as we are about the 2nd.

And yet you don’t see Obama rescinding any of this, do you? Hmmm. As to the last sentence, um,not so much. You need to read more real data, and less dailykos.

Here in Texas, they will take our guns, when they pry them from our cold dead hands. And we’re good shots. After all, guns don’t kill people, dads with pretty daughter’s do.

For example, there were serious concerns in the early days of the movement that minority youth would commit the predominance of hate crimes, as they do many other crimes, were prosecutors to simply read the laws and tried to enforce them with an even hand. Couldn’t have that! Thus the great shuffle between bias crime enforcement and gang crime enforcement, based on the desirability or undesirability of promoting certain crimes as hate.

Also, some prosecutors, without proper guidance from the NGO “trainers,” might actually believe that “gender bias” applied to crimes against women, which, according to the hate crimes establishment, it does not — in practice, and by design (though not in the letter of the law), gender bias charges are reserved for prosecuting people who victimize men who dress like women or women who dress like men, not . . . women. men who target woman after woman, killing them, attacking their genitals, even writing crude slurs on their bodies, need not fear prosecution under hate crime laws. You can kill fifty women and not face a single hate crimes charge, then sexually harass one transvestite and you’re a “hate criminal.”

Holder was at the head of these efforts to impose highly subjective, ideologically-driven outcomes on the enforcement of these laws. Now, twenty years later, Holder’s back, new ethnic organizations have demanded their piece of the hate crimes pie, and the ADL is probably ruing the day that they opened the door to CAIR by demanding ethnic community-group control of enforcement of these American laws in the first place. Live and learn.

The hate crimes mess, which persists in Justice today, has far greater ramifications than any single pardon. It turns the Justice Department into a tool for ideological social engineering and the selective criminalization of speech. Expect much more of the same.

I agree with those who feel that nothing in this article merits anonymous publication. Come on — we all take risks saying what we say. Is you job more important than telling the truth?

That sound you hear is the flapping wings of chickens coming home to roost.