Comments on: Golden State Gay Marriage Ban Struck Down

By: Kendall Davis

Kendall Davis — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:23:32 +0000

Marriages of the same-sex is insanity at best. Nothing in the creation of life supports that concept. In all facets of life it’s always the opoosites that create life and life benefits best from it. Same sex marriages will destroy all that is pure and natural. No one is born Gay as advertised by demented minded people pushing this agenda.It’s really appaulling to me that we as an society give them this kind of power to change and comform to thier desires.There is no basis for same-sex marriage to ever exist in any society. I’d like to add just a twist to how we have got to this horrible time in our society. The full blame of all that is bad in our society with it’s divorce,crime of any kind and the abomation of sin’s fall at the door-step of the minister’s.If they were not not so corrupt and greedy in their lust to keep the masses ignorant we could not be bother with the madness we are fighting today,the madness of same-sex marriage.

By: Pajamas Media » Gay Marriage Advocates in California Face Another Setback

Pajamas Media » Gay Marriage Advocates in California Face Another Setback — Wed, 27 May 2009 07:16:44 +0000

[...] bleak for gay people. The court upheld the marriages of same-sex couples performed after it struck down state statutes limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples “but prior to the effective date of Proposition 8 remain valid.” Moreover, in its [...]

By: Pajamas Media » Making the Case for Gay Marriage

Pajamas Media » Making the Case for Gay Marriage — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:22:50 +0000

[...] the day that decision was handed down, I wrote: Advocates of the traditional definition of marriage have gathered enough signatures to place a [...]

By: GayPatriot » Legitimate Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage

GayPatriot » Legitimate Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:07:30 +0000

[...] (I have addressed this issue before, notably here and here.) [...]

By: Errol Smythe

Errol Smythe — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:42:07 +0000

The State Supreme Courts should read their law books. Their law books recognise that marriage is the union between a man and a woman.Marriage certificates by the millions attest to that.
Marriage is defined as “….. the institution under which a man and a woman become legally united under a permanent basis…..”( Webster’s Dictionary ).
The State Supreme Court may be guilty of proverbially putting “…..lipstick on a pig…”. Literally speaking, a pig is a pig with or without lipstick.The lipstick doesnot change it’s nature or it’s character. Pinning the label of “marriage” on two people of the same sex makes a mockery of law books , judicial precedent, traditional christian values and traditional moral values that regard marriage as between a man and a women.A man marries a woman. The woman becomes the wife to the man who becomes her husband.
For the courts to try and equate a man and a woman getting married in holy matrimony in the eyes of God to any same sex union under the definition of “…marriage …” is to go against legal certainty and to introduce absurdity in the law.
Right now there is a debate of changing marriage licence forms . What a legal mess ! Errol Smythe

By: Sadly, No! » New Wingnut of the Week: GayPatriotWest

Sadly, No! » New Wingnut of the Week: GayPatriotWest — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:42:47 +0000

[...] that this will provoke a chorus of incredulous gasps from any of you SadlyNauts, but Dan is also opposed to the California Supreme Court decision on gay marriage, likening gay marriage to incestuous [...]

By: Errol Smythe

Errol Smythe — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:53:00 +0000

A house has a frontside and the backside
it is sad when a man don’t know which side of the house he belongs to and thinks that his plumbing is all wrong.
Sodom and Gomorrah had that problem. They got burnt to ashes. Repent from your wicked ways or perish. Errol Smythe

By: John M

John M — Thu, 22 May 2008 16:09:34 +0000

Despite what any onr thinks. Read Rom I
and find out who is going to hell including the Judges
of California and those
of Roe vs Wade. And Gays should not be allowed any privileges
especially raising children

By: Eric

Eric — Wed, 21 May 2008 18:41:32 +0000

How exactly did the court overstep its bounds in giving people like me the right to marry?

Anyone who says that the law should universally reflect the ‘will of the people’ doesn’t know that much about American history. In fact, the framers of the United States Constitution knew that a legislature was a necessary tool to delay or block the whims of the popular majority. That is, they realized that direct popular lawmaking is a terrible idea. They also created an independent judiciary so that the values prescribed in the Constitution would be properly reflected in the law. In this case, the California Supreme Court decided that the legal status of marriage in the state was contrary to the values on which the state was founded.

So who gives a shit if the ‘public’ is ready? If you object to my marriage to another man, that’s your problem. I don’t have the time to deal with that. Get a life.

By: Will Becker

Will Becker — Mon, 19 May 2008 20:03:07 +0000

Anything goes in California thats why I wouldn’t live there.