Email This to a Friend

* Your name:

* Your email address:

* Your friend's name:

* Your friend's email address:

Message:

* Required Fields

HBO’s Recount: Hanging Chads, Black Humor

A new movie airing tonight offers a compelling — if not completely objective — portrayal of the pitched battle over Florida's 2000 presidential vote.

May 24, 2008 - by Christian Toto

You didn’t expect a movie retelling the dimpled and hanging chad fiasco that was Bush vs. Gore to be fair and balanced, did you?

Turns out Recount, the new HBO movie debuting at 9 p.m. EST Sunday night (May 25) may be about as impartial as any such film made at this time could be.

Director Jay Roach of Austin Powers fame, teaming with first-time screenwriter Danny Strong, let both sides slug it out, score points, and emerge with much of their dignity intact.

Still, it’s clear who the good guys are from the opening scenes, and two major characters might as well strut across the screen with “kick me” signs pasted on their backs.

Viewed as a straight drama without ideological blinders, Recount is a hoot, a smartly paced film adroitly acted and draped with black humor.

The film follows Ron Klain (Kevin Spacey), Vice President Al Gore’s ex-chief of staff, who commandeers the political fight when the 2000 presidential race remains too close to call well into election night.

We all remember what happened next. Both sides trotted out every legal argument they could find to buttress their case, while the media worked itself into a tizzy with talk of butterfly ballots and voter suppression. Meanwhile, the next leader of the free world remained undecided.

Klain worked initially under former Secretary of State Warren Christopher (John Hurt), depicted here as having less vertebrae than Neville Chamberlain. The gentlemanly Christopher is no match for his GOP opponent, former Secretary of State James Baker (the great Tom Wilkinson). Baker wisely realizes he’s in the middle of a street fight, not a polite conversation about Constitutional ethics.

Both the real Warren Christopher and James Baker contend the film’s portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue, but modern docudramas routinely alienate their sources. Just recall the Clinton administration’s vociferous objections to ABC’s The Path to 9/11.

Eventually, Christopher leaves the battlefield and it’s up to Klain and company to make sure every vote gets recounted — except military ballots lacking the proper postage markings.

Meanwhile, the Bush forces are led by Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris (Laura Dern, a ghoulishly accurate doppelganger). If Christopher is portrayed as a wimp, then Harris is an over-the-top harpy who cares more about her eyeliner than following the letter of the law.

The back-and-forth battle might get exhausting in less competent hands, but there’s always a new fact, a new legal wrinkle to keep us engaged. Strong’s script expertly weaves the major facts of the case into the narrative, and we rarely get those wince-inducing moments too common to historical dramas cooked up quickly for a ratings grab. It’s smart that HBO waited this long before rolling out Recount.

Actual news clips from the era find their way into the film, lending the production another layer of gravitas — and reminding us just how daffy Dan Rather sounded that election night. But it’s hardly necessary. Spacey’s quiet performance reminds us why he’s got two Oscars to his credit, and even the secondary players like Denis Leary and Ed Begley Jr. make their characters register despite modest screen time.

Recount hits hardest at the wildly ineffective voting process on the ground in Florida. The punch card system all but begged for this kind of predicament, and having dozens of counties all adhering to different voting standards only added to the madness.

The film doesn’t badger us with these comic elements. It doesn’t have to. The real story is so good it plays out like the best Hollywood fiction. Recount merely takes that raw material and introduces us to the real people behind the historic tug of war.

Bias hunters will point to a number of reasons to find fault with Recount, from Harris’ portrayal to how the GOP demonstrations are shown to be as manufactured as the Democratic ones are genuine. And while the film follows the story right through the vice president’s concession speech, it’s more than hinted at that had a full recount taken place, history might have been much different.

Viewers may expect the underdog treatment afforded to Klain’s character, but they likely won’t predict the sense of healing that wraps the presentation.

Ultimately, Recount is a rigorously enjoyable farce, a tale of an election where nearly everything that could go wrong did. And yet the country survived. In fact, there’s something positive about the film once the smoke clears. It’s unlikely that both sides would be as civilized today as they were eight years ago, and numerous scenes depict a genuine sense of appreciation felt by the combatants.

Hands are shaken, concession speeches get made, and life goes on.

Let’s hope the upcoming election ends in a similarly civilized fashion.

Christian Toto is a freelance writer and film critic for The Washington Times. His work has appeared in People magazine, MovieMaker Magazine, The Denver Post, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, and Scripps Howard News Service. He also contributes movie radio commentary to three stations as well as the nationally syndicated Dennis Miller Show and runs the blog What Would Toto Watch?

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

14 Comments

1. GM Roper:

As someone somewhere on another blog commented: “The Republicans won the recount, The Democrats won the movie.”

May 25, 2008 - 10:24 am 2. postaldog:

The TV reviewer for the St. Pete Times swears that James Baker insists the movie’s portrayals of the GOP’s meetings and events are accurate and even hosted a premier party for the film.

Who’s right?

May 25, 2008 - 7:44 pm 3. Dog Gone:

Uh, postaldog, not exactly accurate report on your behalf. Baker said the movie was “entertaining” and didn’t expect it to be historically accurate. It is, after all, a movie.

May 25, 2008 - 11:21 pm 4. AP:

The NY Times published a 10,000 word article demonstrating how it and a consortium of newspapers recounted the Florida vote. Bush won it. They hated to admit it, but he won it. We really need to move past this, now.

When Richard Nixon had Chicago stolen from him, he let it go, for the good of the nation, to keep it from exactly this sort of crap. Al Gore was a lesser man than Nixon.

May 26, 2008 - 12:22 am 5. I’d like to see the new HBO movie on the Florida recount. >> liberal.family:

[...] I’d like to see the new HBO movie on the Florida recount. [...]

May 26, 2008 - 10:51 am 6. postaldog:

Dog gone,

It wasn’t me, it was Eric Deggans of the Times that said that. This is from his e-mail to me:

“The producers also say that James Baker has supported their script, providing feedback on early drafts and hosting a premiere in houston. They say Baker was precient to see that the recount struggle was a street fight, and stand behind the accuracy of everything they portray.”

I think the film is liberal propaganda, I’m just pointing out that we have two different statements from two different reporters.

Like I said — who’s right?

May 26, 2008 - 8:02 pm 7. George Clarke:

The main problem with Gore’s gerry-mandered recount was that Miami delayed its count precisely long enough not to recount the Spanish neighborhoods which leaned to Bush and, mirabile dictu, the Florida Supremes upheld something that outlandishly illegal, that violated Florida Statute which the Florida Supremes simply ignored. The main basis for the Federal Supremes saying “can’t do” was because this was so patently contrived, self-serving, discriminatory against the descendants of former slaves (by democratic Southern politicians no less) and expressly forbidden by long-standing Florida statute. All the real logic of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling based on these facts, which was eminently correct, was of course missing from the movie, but who cares about truth when the pretend cover story that the Democrats have convinced themselves of is so much more interesting.

May 26, 2008 - 8:06 pm 8. Joe B:

I would also note the timing of the film’s release. Purely coincindental, I’m sure.

May 27, 2008 - 7:05 am 9. BizzyBlog » Election 2000: Media Continue to Downplay Florida’s Military Ballots Controversy:

[...] has not investigated, and that “Recount” appears to addresses barely, if the review by Pajamas Media’s Christian Toto is any [...]

May 27, 2008 - 7:09 am 10. RW:

Caught most of it but other than the dramatic impact of a good story found it to be quite obvious in its slant.

It’s contrived to make the Rats look like some noble cause instead of ballot shoppers they really were.

If you were in the military, non-liberal counties, or independent Hispanic voting areas, they didn’t want to have anything to do with you.

They glaringly made the 7-2 vote by the Supreme Court look like some coverup to the latter 5-4 decision.

That distortion being the final touch to the Democrat dream.

At the end of the movie they failed to mention the media consortium, including the NY Times that counted Florida’s ballots ten ways to Sunday and in almost every possible standard, Bush won.

You think that a text saying such would have not been inserted if it had been the other way?

May 27, 2008 - 8:02 am 11. MarkD:

“Ultimately, Recount is a … farce.”
No, ultimately Recount is a lie.

May 28, 2008 - 6:53 am 12. politicalreacharound:

GM Roper: the results are just in and it looks like all of America (except you)lost. Congratulations on your candidate winning. I am sure he will go down as one of the greats. A uniter, not a nation builder, steward of the land, legacy maker.

May 28, 2008 - 11:31 am 13. L Boucher:

I watched Recount last night. Boy what a piece of Democratic propaganda. My God Denis Leary looked sick with that two dollar hair dye job and stiff hair!
(Even stiffer than his acting!)

May 30, 2008 - 1:24 am 14. WHAT WOULD TOTO WATCH? » This week’s DVD choices This week’s DVD choices — WHAT WOULD TOTO WATCH?:

[...] desire to revisit the 2000 Gore/Bush election? You might change your mind after seeing “Recount,” one of several intriguing flicks hitting DVD stores [...]

Aug 19, 2008 - 11:51 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: