Comments on: Hillary Shouldn’t Give Up

By: John Samford

John Samford — Thu, 08 May 2008 13:06:41 +0000

For all you Billery fans;

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080508/NATION/602407036/1001

The girl is dirty. Very dirty. Indictable dirty. You think this is bad, wait until the retired FBI guys that were working on the Jordan case Swift Boat Shrillery.

Mathew Cole, a poll is NOT evidence. Pols are tools. Nothing more, nothing less. Obviously you slept thru your Stat101 class. To bad. If you had stayed awake you would have learned that statistical studies ( polls, models, etc.) are tools used by scientists to help them find evidence. Watch CSI. Those microscopes are not evidence, they are tools used to find evidence. People with lower then room temperature IQ’s and those that slept thru Stat101 can’t tell the difference. That doesn’t mean it’s not there.

By: C. Navarro

C. Navarro — Thu, 08 May 2008 04:22:09 +0000

Give it up, Hillary. We good-ole-boys here in North Carolina weren’t fooled one bit by those speeches you gave from the bed of a pickup truck. We aren’t as gullible as you think. We know that people who raked in 100 million in eight years aren’t the kind who drive around in pickups or have friends who do. As Lincoln put it: “You can’t fool all of the people all of the time. So give it up. You and your de facto running mate, husband Bill, have run out of tricks.

By: Uma

Uma — Mon, 05 May 2008 07:15:17 +0000

Only cowards beg their opponents to go away. America is in BIG trouble if a coward becomes commander-in-chief.

By: Kendall Johnson

Kendall Johnson — Mon, 05 May 2008 04:31:42 +0000

I am so sick of hearing about all the states Obama won. Most of these states are red states with almost no people living in them!!!! Wyoming is no measure of a democratic candidates electability. Florida and Ohio are measures of electability. Obama might have won more states, but Clinton won the states with the most people. A matter of fact the states Clinton won represent more than two thirds of the country’s population and where the majority of democrats live!!!!!! HILLARY IS THE LEADER!!!!!!

By: anne white

anne white — Mon, 05 May 2008 02:58:00 +0000

Right on target! Hillary is in all the way to Denver, and why shouldn’t she? Why do we have primaries in all states? If they wouldn’t count why bother? Let Iowa and NH decide for everyone and cancel the rest of the states primaries. It’s not a coronation, regarless of what Obama may think. I don’t see anyone asking him to quit, even though he doesn’t have the needed delegates either? Not only is Obama bored he is also afraid, that’s why he won’t debate!

By: Veyry Serrano

Veyry Serrano — Mon, 05 May 2008 02:30:31 +0000

You are so right.Hillary is the only candidate 100% for this job.She’s the only one capable to beat McCain.Obama needs a lot of more years to learn from Hillary.We don’t want Hillary to quit; Obama’s people are afraid of her.GO HILLARY!

By: gordo

gordo — Sun, 04 May 2008 02:50:38 +0000

Hillary is appearing, after some tough fighting, to be the better candidate. But the Dems have to give Obama the nod otherwise a bloodbath within the party would ensue. So, enter Al Gore. The Dems have a candidate who could win and the party doesn’t rip itself apart. We’ll see.

By: Mathew Cole

Mathew Cole — Sat, 03 May 2008 15:17:32 +0000

Ron,

Here’s a site –

electoral-vote.com

That site uses the latest HRC/McC and BHO/McC polls to detemine the likely winner of a general election if it were held tomorrow.

In other words, it’s speculation backed by evidence. Not just speculation.

By: John Samford

John Samford — Thu, 01 May 2008 14:50:03 +0000

Never forget that Billery has a higher diapproval rating then PRESIDENT Bush. By about 10 points. 40% of the general election voters will vote against Billery. That means they have to get over 80% of the remaining voters to win, which while not impossible, has never been done before. IIRC, the largest margin ever was in the 60’s. So after stealing the nomination, Billery has their work cut out. It breaks out about the same on EV’s.
What I find most interesting about this upcoming election is that Ca. is in play for the first time since Ronnie. That is due to the Mexican vote. Hunter would make a good VP. If he helps with Ca he would be a GREAT VP and the front runner for ‘12.

By: Ron

Ron — Thu, 01 May 2008 00:45:04 +0000

Pure speculation she would beat McCain easier than Obama.
Another thing is the Superdelegates, funny thatmost of them that give Obama support are former cabinet members of the Clintons.