In Focus: Clinton vs. Obama – It’s Getting Dirty

Mud wrestling gets ratings, writes Sheryl Longin, but does it win elections?

March 6, 2008 - by Sheryl Longin

With the inconclusive results of Super Tuesday 2, unpredictable superdelegates in Ohio, and Michigan and Florida threatening do-overs, there’s no light on the horizon for average guy Tom Hanks and the legions of Americans who share his pain.

But when a famous actor speaks, the two Democratic contenders sit up and take notice. Okay, that’s putting the best spin possible on both campaigns’ decisions, just one day after hinting at a possible joint ticket, to spice up the election by going nasty.

While it does have the Karl Rove anticipated effect of pushing the Republican nominee off the radar, it’s a short term fix for a long term problem. Not to mention, how low can they go and still make Diane Sawyer’s dream
come true?

CNN’s helpful attempt to clarify the situation by asking viewers whether Obama should go negative only further illustrates the Democrats’ dilemma. Predictably, responses are split down the middle. Perhaps the broadcast news networks should change their graphics to “Indecision ‘08″.

Who’s the biggest loser in all this chaos? My vote goes to DNC chair Howard Dean who seems to be ducking Florida Sen. Bill Nelson’s angry calls.

I only hope, in his frustration, he doesn’t let loose with another of his signature yelps.

Somewhere in Brentwood, Tom Hanks is reaching for an Extra-Strength Tylenol. America is reaching with him.

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

2 Comments

1. Hotpatch 6:

Poor Obama! He has not yet experienced the full wrath of the Clinton machine. But when he does, the “politics of personal destruction” will take on a whole new meaning for the young rockstar.

If he wasn’t a Democrat, I might feel sorry for him.

Mar 7, 2008 - 2:37 pm 2. Nicky:

“Why choose if you can combine?”

This is the title of a LDV United (an advertising agency in Antwerp, Belgium) campaign for the HUB (the first ever university and college in one)
because it is an university and college in one, people no longer have to make a decision between university or college.
to emphasise this idea, LDV United combined the faces of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in one picture.
this “Why choose if you can combine?”-campaign is really funny and well worked out. See for yourself: http://www.advertisinghangar.be/ , it is worthwile, believe me.

Mar 10, 2008 - 3:55 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: