<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Focus: Petraeus Speaks But Who&#8217;s Listening?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:12:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Samford</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29903</link>
		<dc:creator>John Samford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29903</guid>
		<description>When things are going well, no change is goooood.
Most change is bad anyway.  Change can be winning the Lottery, or having your leg torn off by a pit bull.  Most people tend to think more about the lottery then the pit bull.  This is a well known psychological fact that changemongers and other con men use to fool people.
The trick is to avoid being pinned down on exactly what the change is.  If the change is delineated, the suckers will start to find the flaws in it.  If the con man stays vague, then the suckers fill in the details them selves.  The most believable lie is the one you tell yourself.  Plus the con man cannot be held accountable for a lie his suckers tell themselves.
So Congress is doing well when they &quot;exist in a political echo chamber, full of sound and fury but signifying nothing.&quot;  I still think the do nothing Congress is a clever plot to get re-elected by the Demonrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When things are going well, no change is goooood.<br />
Most change is bad anyway.  Change can be winning the Lottery, or having your leg torn off by a pit bull.  Most people tend to think more about the lottery then the pit bull.  This is a well known psychological fact that changemongers and other con men use to fool people.<br />
The trick is to avoid being pinned down on exactly what the change is.  If the change is delineated, the suckers will start to find the flaws in it.  If the con man stays vague, then the suckers fill in the details them selves.  The most believable lie is the one you tell yourself.  Plus the con man cannot be held accountable for a lie his suckers tell themselves.<br />
So Congress is doing well when they &#8220;exist in a political echo chamber, full of sound and fury but signifying nothing.&#8221;  I still think the do nothing Congress is a clever plot to get re-elected by the Demonrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratatosk</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29696</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratatosk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29696</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I listen to it (NPR) every now and then, but if I listened to it all the time I would have to see a shrink&lt;/i&gt;

I find that NPR, FOX, CNN etc are all biased in one way or another... the only sane news I&#039;ve found has been through filtering multiple news sources and then assuming that its slanted right or left anyway...

The sad state of a Free Press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I listen to it (NPR) every now and then, but if I listened to it all the time I would have to see a shrink</i></p>
<p>I find that NPR, FOX, CNN etc are all biased in one way or another&#8230; the only sane news I&#8217;ve found has been through filtering multiple news sources and then assuming that its slanted right or left anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The sad state of a Free Press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floss</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29435</link>
		<dc:creator>Floss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29435</guid>
		<description>The President remarks to the American people seemed very strong and honest. He did as he said he would do, listen to the advice of General Petraeus, and make his decisions.  Congresswoman Pelosi and Senator Reid, however, seem to stumble through their rebuttal to the Presidents comments. I am sure, not many noticed, but the two of them sounded weak and dishonest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President remarks to the American people seemed very strong and honest. He did as he said he would do, listen to the advice of General Petraeus, and make his decisions.  Congresswoman Pelosi and Senator Reid, however, seem to stumble through their rebuttal to the Presidents comments. I am sure, not many noticed, but the two of them sounded weak and dishonest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Hope</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29199</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29199</guid>
		<description>If YOU HAVEN&#039;T LOOKED IT UP THIS WILL EXPLAIN WHY THE TERM IS DIFFICULT FOR WASHINGTON TO LIVE WITH.

&quot;CANDOR&quot; THE QUALITY OF BEING HONEST, STRAIGHT FORWARD IN ATTITUDE &amp; SPEECH. THE ABILITY TO MAKE JUDGEMENT FREE FROM DISCRIMINATION OR DISHONESTY.

THE WORD IS A SIMPLE NOUN, BUT NOT SIMPLE FOR THEM TO USE  WHEN IN DISCUSSION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If YOU HAVEN&#8217;T LOOKED IT UP THIS WILL EXPLAIN WHY THE TERM IS DIFFICULT FOR WASHINGTON TO LIVE WITH.</p>
<p>&#8220;CANDOR&#8221; THE QUALITY OF BEING HONEST, STRAIGHT FORWARD IN ATTITUDE &amp; SPEECH. THE ABILITY TO MAKE JUDGEMENT FREE FROM DISCRIMINATION OR DISHONESTY.</p>
<p>THE WORD IS A SIMPLE NOUN, BUT NOT SIMPLE FOR THEM TO USE  WHEN IN DISCUSSION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Hope</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29181</guid>
		<description>They don&#039;t teach &quot;POLITICAL CANDOR &quot; in high school or college, so should we expect our elected officials or reprsentatives to understand the meaning of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t teach &#8220;POLITICAL CANDOR &#8221; in high school or college, so should we expect our elected officials or reprsentatives to understand the meaning of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jambrowski</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29166</link>
		<dc:creator>jambrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29166</guid>
		<description>That is because the only thing they care to hear is their own voice, not the voices of the people that serve us, or for that matter us. But, this is nothing new nor is it something we were not expecting. 
My wife was driving home from work yesterday, listening to NPR, we sat down to dinner and were watching Fox News, she says &quot;my goodness, this isn&#039;t the story that NPR was telling&quot;. She has been saying that a lot these days. I listen to it (NPR) every now and then, but if I listened to it all the time I would have to see a shrink, they might as well be Hanoi Jane or Cuban free radio, cause the sky is/has/ and continues to only fall on us everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is because the only thing they care to hear is their own voice, not the voices of the people that serve us, or for that matter us. But, this is nothing new nor is it something we were not expecting.<br />
My wife was driving home from work yesterday, listening to NPR, we sat down to dinner and were watching Fox News, she says &#8220;my goodness, this isn&#8217;t the story that NPR was telling&#8221;. She has been saying that a lot these days. I listen to it (NPR) every now and then, but if I listened to it all the time I would have to see a shrink, they might as well be Hanoi Jane or Cuban free radio, cause the sky is/has/ and continues to only fall on us everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Katz Keating</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-29149</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Katz Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/in-focus-petraeus-speaks-but-whos-listening/#comment-29149</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the Petraeus testimony. The Senate has been holding hearings on Iraq for the past week or more, and yet... the witnesses&#039; words have gone mostly unheard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the Petraeus testimony. The Senate has been holding hearings on Iraq for the past week or more, and yet&#8230; the witnesses&#8217; words have gone mostly unheard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
