Israel’s Plight: 1948 and Today

Arab and Palestinian rejectionism — then and now — makes seeking a two-state solution pure folly.

May 1, 2009 - by Ron Radosh

Read the rest of the story here.

Ronald Radosh is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at The Hudson Institute, and a Prof. Emeritus of History at the City University of New York. He is the author or co-author of 14 books.

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

1 Comment

1. JFM:

Marie Claude

I notice that all the sites you refer me have some points in common:

1) They support your thethesis
2) Stalin and De Gaulle good, Franco and America bad
3) Florid author’s opinions and light on facts.

Now look like how a seriolus author would do:

Fact one: Franco asks Hitler for 400,000 tons wheat and Hitler denies his request. Franco pretexts this to deny Hitler’s requests to attack Gibraltar

Fact two: Prior to the Hendaya meeting Admiral Canaris has advised Franco not to make any pacts with Hitler.

Now an anti-franquist historian would tell about the facts and then tell that it was just that Franco was too greedy to Hitler taste. A pro-Franco one would tell that Franco despised Hitler and nazism that thanks to Caanris Franco knew exactly how much Hitler was able to give and so he asked for much more: ie if Hitler had been able to grant 400,000 tons wheat Franco would have asked for a million tons.

That is what historians do, that is not what the chomkist crap you refer me to, tells.

BTW

Fact three: Franco said no, France said yes but in the later case it was just that Hitler hated France so much he wasn’t interested

May 12, 2009 - 12:02 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: