<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Weapons System a Shoe-In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:11:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jesus</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-175020</link>
		<dc:creator>jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-175020</guid>
		<description>wow today i learn next type of weapon so interesting to read bt the act of reporter is nt justified bt dats his anger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow today i learn next type of weapon so interesting to read bt the act of reporter is nt justified bt dats his anger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-171212</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-171212</guid>
		<description>To 888: With Bush, anything that sounds like he did for once a good job has to be taken with a grain of salt:
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29241

Even if he had this one good thing without strings, he is still destined to go down in the history books as one of our worse Presidents ever, both in terms of integrity and competency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To 888: With Bush, anything that sounds like he did for once a good job has to be taken with a grain of salt:<br />
<a href="http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29241" rel="nofollow">http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29241</a></p>
<p>Even if he had this one good thing without strings, he is still destined to go down in the history books as one of our worse Presidents ever, both in terms of integrity and competency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170998</guid>
		<description>I think the laws being enforced in the handling of the shoe thrower are Iraqi laws, so it&#039;s really not President Bush&#039;s choice whether or not he is released.

Wonder what bambi (and his worshippers) will do when someone throws something at him from 15 feet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the laws being enforced in the handling of the shoe thrower are Iraqi laws, so it&#8217;s really not President Bush&#8217;s choice whether or not he is released.</p>
<p>Wonder what bambi (and his worshippers) will do when someone throws something at him from 15 feet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myth buster</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170584</link>
		<dc:creator>myth buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170584</guid>
		<description>I agree that since President Bush was the victim, it should be his decision whether or not to press charges.  Since he&#039;s forgiven the assailant, go ahead and release him.  At the very least, drop the &quot;Insulting a foreign leader,&quot; charge.  That&#039;s more of an insult to us and to President Bush than throwing a shoe is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that since President Bush was the victim, it should be his decision whether or not to press charges.  Since he&#8217;s forgiven the assailant, go ahead and release him.  At the very least, drop the &#8220;Insulting a foreign leader,&#8221; charge.  That&#8217;s more of an insult to us and to President Bush than throwing a shoe is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 888</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170452</link>
		<dc:creator>888</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170452</guid>
		<description>BC (20):  BUSH DID NOT STAND BY AND ALLOW 800,000 AFRICANS TO BE MASSACRED LIKE CLINTON DID IN 1994.  No comparison, guy.  Don&#039;t even go there and try to rationalize and justify and cover up for Clinton using Bosnia, which to this day, is marred in political problems and which Clinton used at the time to move the discussion and the spotlight from his ever-growing scandals.  

If Bush (or any Republican) was in office in 1994 and not intervene and help like Clinton failed to do in Rwanda, Bush would have been villified forever by everyone, because everyone is manipulated and controlled by the liberal media and establishment.  Instead, those establishments covered up for Clinton&#039;s failure and disgrace in this horrible tragedy.  And they&#039;re still covering up for him.  Don&#039;t worry, though, because Africa remembers what he didn&#039;t do for them.  

Of course, because Bush is a good and kind-hearted man, he would never have allowed that genocide in Rwanda to happen.  He would&#039;ve intervened.  He is a true compassionate conservative.  Again, as usual, when he does something good, the MSM and people like you, BC, spin it and paint a different picture of him -- i.e., that he&#039;s a warmonger, etc.  

As for Bush&#039;s legacy in Africa, well, suffice it to say, his accomplishments in Africa have no  comparison to any other U.S. president&#039;s to date.  President Bush has spent BILLIONS in Africa, trying to rid the continent of malaria, HIV and other diseases.  We have also been in Africa now for the last few years establishing and implementing Bush&#039;s new military Command called AFRICOM.  Under AFRICOM, we are rebuilding and strengthening the African armies to defend themselves and reconstructing the infrastructure to help the African people.  That infrastructure that we are helping to build or rebuild include education systems, medical systems, economic and trade systems, etc., etc., etc.  George W. Bush is loved in Africa, and the media is not talking about it.  It&#039;s obvious why.  

You can find some of Bush&#039;s accomplishments in Africa in the following weblink, although, as usual because he and his administration are humble, not all of his achievements are listed:   http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/africa/accomplishments.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC (20):  BUSH DID NOT STAND BY AND ALLOW 800,000 AFRICANS TO BE MASSACRED LIKE CLINTON DID IN 1994.  No comparison, guy.  Don&#8217;t even go there and try to rationalize and justify and cover up for Clinton using Bosnia, which to this day, is marred in political problems and which Clinton used at the time to move the discussion and the spotlight from his ever-growing scandals.  </p>
<p>If Bush (or any Republican) was in office in 1994 and not intervene and help like Clinton failed to do in Rwanda, Bush would have been villified forever by everyone, because everyone is manipulated and controlled by the liberal media and establishment.  Instead, those establishments covered up for Clinton&#8217;s failure and disgrace in this horrible tragedy.  And they&#8217;re still covering up for him.  Don&#8217;t worry, though, because Africa remembers what he didn&#8217;t do for them.  </p>
<p>Of course, because Bush is a good and kind-hearted man, he would never have allowed that genocide in Rwanda to happen.  He would&#8217;ve intervened.  He is a true compassionate conservative.  Again, as usual, when he does something good, the MSM and people like you, BC, spin it and paint a different picture of him &#8212; i.e., that he&#8217;s a warmonger, etc.  </p>
<p>As for Bush&#8217;s legacy in Africa, well, suffice it to say, his accomplishments in Africa have no  comparison to any other U.S. president&#8217;s to date.  President Bush has spent BILLIONS in Africa, trying to rid the continent of malaria, HIV and other diseases.  We have also been in Africa now for the last few years establishing and implementing Bush&#8217;s new military Command called AFRICOM.  Under AFRICOM, we are rebuilding and strengthening the African armies to defend themselves and reconstructing the infrastructure to help the African people.  That infrastructure that we are helping to build or rebuild include education systems, medical systems, economic and trade systems, etc., etc., etc.  George W. Bush is loved in Africa, and the media is not talking about it.  It&#8217;s obvious why.  </p>
<p>You can find some of Bush&#8217;s accomplishments in Africa in the following weblink, although, as usual because he and his administration are humble, not all of his achievements are listed:   <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/africa/accomplishments.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/africa/accomplishments.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170346</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170346</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;The poor guy missed the translation; He was supposed to throw a towel.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The poor guy missed the translation; He was supposed to throw a towel.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170321</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170321</guid>
		<description>Gee, from reading the ranting left wing main line media, the &quot;shoe in&quot; was the political equivalent of the &quot;Tet Offensive.&quot;   Now all we need is Nixon&#039;s  wage and price controls, a cap and carbon trade, with a win in Iraq, and the democrats can pull a repeat of the 70s economic difficulties,  pulling the plug on the war.  It&#039;s a war of choice after all.  It&#039;s too bad that Obama, like Ford, gets to be the democrat&#039;s fall guy for the the defeat.  Of course, one way around this is to make the defeat in a war of choice a necessary historical inevitability peculiar to Bush.   Hey, girls, get ready for Sharia. Uncle Obama loves you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, from reading the ranting left wing main line media, the &#8220;shoe in&#8221; was the political equivalent of the &#8220;Tet Offensive.&#8221;   Now all we need is Nixon&#8217;s  wage and price controls, a cap and carbon trade, with a win in Iraq, and the democrats can pull a repeat of the 70s economic difficulties,  pulling the plug on the war.  It&#8217;s a war of choice after all.  It&#8217;s too bad that Obama, like Ford, gets to be the democrat&#8217;s fall guy for the the defeat.  Of course, one way around this is to make the defeat in a war of choice a necessary historical inevitability peculiar to Bush.   Hey, girls, get ready for Sharia. Uncle Obama loves you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170307</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170307</guid>
		<description>Cedarford: so shoe-throwing is a serious insult in Arab culture?  I&#039;ll take your word for it.  In our culture, it isn&#039;t.  At most it&#039;s a self-important jackass being rude.  You criticize the president for failing to act like an Arab; he acted like an American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cedarford: so shoe-throwing is a serious insult in Arab culture?  I&#8217;ll take your word for it.  In our culture, it isn&#8217;t.  At most it&#8217;s a self-important jackass being rude.  You criticize the president for failing to act like an Arab; he acted like an American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugs</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170289</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170289</guid>
		<description>cedarford,

I don&#039;t think Bush&#039;s response to the incident indicates anything negative about Bush. He responded as an American President in the spotlight should respond to a political demonstration - by not making a big deal out of it.

That the Arabs interpret his response as weakness says more about Arab culture than it does about Bush&#039;s intelligence. He was right not to lower himself to their primitive level, regardless of the PR effect. You don&#039;t treat a mental patient by validating his delusions, and you don&#039;t help the Arabs into the 21sth century by validating their foul beliefs about honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cedarford,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Bush&#8217;s response to the incident indicates anything negative about Bush. He responded as an American President in the spotlight should respond to a political demonstration &#8211; by not making a big deal out of it.</p>
<p>That the Arabs interpret his response as weakness says more about Arab culture than it does about Bush&#8217;s intelligence. He was right not to lower himself to their primitive level, regardless of the PR effect. You don&#8217;t treat a mental patient by validating his delusions, and you don&#8217;t help the Arabs into the 21sth century by validating their foul beliefs about honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/latest-weapons-system-a-shoe-in/comment-page-1/#comment-170246</link>
		<dc:creator>mk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=41718#comment-170246</guid>
		<description>cedarford, 
Darling,
Russia is consolidating her power again.  They want to be a superpower.  What the hell do you think that invasion of Georgia was about this summer?  Oil Pipeline directly from Eastern Europe to Iran.

China, Cuba and Russia are working to establish more communist/socialist governments so that they can be more powerful.  It has little to do with &quot;America&#039;s declining power.&quot;  It&#039;s more akin to the Arab league meeting before the 1973 Yom Kippur War - they wouldn&#039;t invite Israel to that meeting.  Why would these countries invite their own enemy to their shindig?

Of course, I&#039;m sure in your great intellect, you are going to insult me, call me a &quot;neocon Zionist redneck&quot;, and pat yourself on the back for being sooooo much smarter than me so have at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cedarford,<br />
Darling,<br />
Russia is consolidating her power again.  They want to be a superpower.  What the hell do you think that invasion of Georgia was about this summer?  Oil Pipeline directly from Eastern Europe to Iran.</p>
<p>China, Cuba and Russia are working to establish more communist/socialist governments so that they can be more powerful.  It has little to do with &#8220;America&#8217;s declining power.&#8221;  It&#8217;s more akin to the Arab league meeting before the 1973 Yom Kippur War &#8211; they wouldn&#8217;t invite Israel to that meeting.  Why would these countries invite their own enemy to their shindig?</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m sure in your great intellect, you are going to insult me, call me a &#8220;neocon Zionist redneck&#8221;, and pat yourself on the back for being sooooo much smarter than me so have at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
