Myanmar Junta: Deadlier than Any Cyclone
The question isn't why the Myanmar's military government refused to allow aid workers to minister to victims of the recent cyclone. The question is why anyone would be surprised this would be so.
When the deadly tsunami hit western Thailand and its neighboring countries in December 2004, there was little attention given to what possible destruction had been wrought upon the southwestern coastal population of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma.
Prior to 2007’s “Saffron Revolution,” many people in the west would have had a difficult time locating Myanmar on a map. But the monk-led protests against Myanmar’s military government brought the plight of the Burmese people into the headlines.
Now, as they struggle to survive the aftermath of a major cyclone, the world’s attention has returned to this unfortunate nation once more — attention that the ruling junta would rather do without. After the extent of the destruction the cyclone had caused became apparent, various countries, aid agencies, and the United Nations offered assistance on a massive scale.
These efforts immediately ran into a bureaucratic brick wall which prevented the help that the suffering citizens of Myanmar needed so desperately from coming into the country. Aid was eventually sent, but whether it ever reached any of those who needed it is doubtful. Aid workers were refused visas for weeks while the death toll began to rise to staggering numbers. Only after a great deal of diplomatic pressure was applied did the junta finally relent and begin to let aid and disaster relief workers into the country.
Few, however, were allowed to get anywhere near the hardest hit areas. Now — only a few weeks after relief efforts began — the junta has begun closing cyclone relief centers and announced that all foreign aid workers must leave. They have rejected any additional food aid because the people can eat “large frogs” that are plentiful during rainy season.
The regime’s official newspaper renewed its attacks on foreign aid and insisted their people could now survive without outside help. The Orwellian named publication The New Light of Myanmar, which is the junta’s official newspaper, announced: “The government and the people are like parents and children. We, all the people, were pleased with the efforts of the government.”
Over the past months, various world leaders and UN officials have expressed frustration at the junta’s reluctance to allow foreign aid workers in to monitor the distribution of aid and assist in relief efforts. There has been genuine surprise at the junta’s inflexibility.
There is no reason for surprise: anyone familiar with the junta’s paranoid nature would not be. Refusing to allow aid workers in because they might provide the local populace with rumors of the outside world or prevent the junta’s minions from dividing up the windfall of supplies amongst themselves is business as usual from a group who had no problem with ordering soldiers to open fire on unarmed civilians or drag monks out into the jungle and beat them to death with rifle butts.
As a British colony, Burma was one of the richest nations in Asia, possessing abundant natural resources in fuel, timber, mineral and food stuffs. When the generals took power in 1962, a socialist utopia was promised but never delivered. Instead, the country now known as Myanmar have been subjected to decades of corruption, political oppression and cruelty. With an annual military budget last year of $2.84 billion, the junta has purchased arms from China. It has also aggressively bought up newer, high quality weapons from Russia and North Korea. By offering up its vast natural gas supplies, Myanmar has also found willing arms suppliers in neighboring countries such as India. The purpose of this massive spending isn’t only to secure the nation’s borders against a “feared” U.S. led invasion – but to keep an iron grip on the populace and continue a policy of ethnic cleansing against the Karen and Hmong peoples.
The junta is also deeply involved in illicit activities such as human trafficking and the opium trade. As contemporaries of the North Vietnamese, the junta has dropped its collectivist trappings and become little more than gangsters within their own country.
As unfathomable as the junta’s antics have been with regard to the cyclone relief efforts, what is equally puzzling is why anyone would expect anything different.
![]() |
![]() |
Podcasts | PJM Home |





PJM Home


Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
7 Comments
1. Dark Helmet:This is the ultimate that socialism has to offer. Why would anyone here in the USA want to elect a socialist? Be careful, our ‘local food security ‘ people are all communists as well.
Jun 10, 2008 - 7:58 am 2. locomotivebreath1901:Brutal commie dictatorships. The far left’s favorite fantasy here in the West. Almost on par with the far left’s fascination with islamo-fascists. Why is that, anyways?
Must be all that open minded tolerance cr@p.
But, what we sensible people in the West must do is define things properly. Your article brought up why most folks here in the West snooze at this news:
“…many people in the west would have had a difficult time locating Myanmar on a map.”
That’s because it is not “Myanmar”. It’s proper name is “Burma”, and has been for many centuries.
The name “myanmar” is the moniker imposed upon the region by the same brutal regime which imposes it’s brutal rule on the Burmese people.
It’s all been done with the barrel of a gun and the death of many Burmese – not the will of the people.
Other than that, you are spot on with your analysis: Why does this brutality from a brutal commie regime brutalize anyone’s sensibilities as to the brutal management of a horrific situation?? It’s to be expected.
Keep up the good work.
Jun 10, 2008 - 8:08 am 3. Jon Force:This comment might sound a little ridiculous here, but I saw Rambo 4 the other day and before you write this off as dumb, not only is it by far the best Rambo movie and best action movie to come out in years, (surprising I know, I was shocked) but it highlights the brutality of the junta in Burma and even contains some real footage taken by Burmese freedom fighters. Although much of the movie is action/fantasy I don’t think the brutality shown in the movie is too far fetched.. at all. I recommend it if you have the stomach for it. The movie had a decidedly right wing message.
Jun 10, 2008 - 9:10 am 4. tn-Japan:This shows how corrupted, irresponsible, and socialist the UN has becomed. They couldn’t even put it up for a vote at the UN Security Council because China and Russia would veto it.
China and Russia keep this Junta regimes and others around the world who suppress their people alive.
Time for the US to leave the UN immediately and ally with willing nations to do the right things around the world.
Jun 11, 2008 - 10:36 pm 5. JK:There’s a bit more to Burma than most media or well-meaning people in general realize:
http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/2007/10/burma_proceed_w.php
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
Jun 12, 2008 - 3:05 am 6. Danae:This is what Socialism delivers, forget what it promises. We in the US should take note, Obama is a Marxist Socialist. Electing that man would begin us down the same path that the poor prople in Burma allowed. Are we going to make the same mistake they did?
I pray not.
Jun 12, 2008 - 8:48 am 7. JK:Obama just might be the super dooper Marxist Socialist of all time. But there is that piece of paper known as the Constitution. Term limits have not been a particularly popular issue with incumbent Houses of Congress.
Good thing the founders and (admittedly) Congress saw fit to effectively term limit one office. I think the country will prevail in the end. Provided I can buy the gas to get to the polls.
Jun 12, 2008 - 10:52 am