Cuba Libre: Next Step for Island Should Be Democracy
It's a gross insult to the Cuban people to suggest that the country should adopt the "Chinese model" now that Fidel Castro has resigned, says Bridget Johnson.
No sooner than the ink was dry on Fidel Castro’s farewell tome, and pundits started theorizing about the future of Cuba — many talking heads wistfully, hopefully suggesting that Cuba’s next step could be shaping itself to the “Chinese model.”
What a perfectly normal baby step, went the punditry, suggesting that a slightly freer market would compensate for the fact that human beings are still treated like chattel by the communist state.
What a gross insult to the Cuban people.
As long as Fidel Castro is alive and his brother Raul is still in power, the brothers might — the stress on “might” — seize the opportunity to gradually open up the island in economic terms. This could put them on a plane that would earn the praise of the deluded admirers of China’s allegedly freer communist regime.
But if Cuba is following the Chinese model, they need to start by throwing some more dissidents in prison, adding on to 2003’s “Black Spring” crackdown in which 75 human-rights activists, Castro opponents, democracy proponents and independent journalists were tossed behind bars for infuriatingly lengthy terms.
As of today, China has 31 journalists in jail and Cuba has 23, according to Reporters Without Borders. Granted, the population difference is night and day, but isn’t China supposed to be the progressive model of an evolved communist society?
In addition, China has at least 49 cyberdissidents locked up; that is what would follow in Cuba if they let Joe Citizen have a computer and then followed the Chinese model of a heavily policed “Internet” that’s actually an intranet. Who knows, Yahoo might even help Raul nab some free-thinkers in the interest of taking advantage of new economic opportunities!”
In aspiring to be like China, they could churn out low-quality junk in sweatshop conditions while wooing American firms with low labor costs. Just don’t use the toothpaste or feed your pets the vittles.
If, like China, Cubans began to get greater tastes of freedom, they’d likely be inspired to use their God-given voices and rally peacefully for the God-given right of self-determination — like China, to be met with a fierce military crackdown a la Raul and the wizard still lurking behind the curtain, Fidel. And like Shi Tao — Yahoo’s Chinese catch — they could then go to prison for daring to even spread reports on government warnings against news coverage of the massacre’s anniversary.
Whether it’s China’s “new” communism or the old-school status quo, it’s still a one-party, totalitarian system that tramples basic human dignity in the name of consolidated power.
Of course, talk of greater, limited openness for Cuba must be music to the ears of Castro’s protege Hugo Chavez, who undoubtedly has been eagerly waiting to take the Marxist mantle from the old man.
Chavez’s tenure has been about correcting the isolationist flaw of Castro’s communist vision, traveling the globe and building alliances with nefarious regimes that could be useful to him in terms of military and economic issues, and getting cozy with the U.N. Security Council’s “authoritarian veto” — China and Russia. He doesn’t want his Bolivarian Revolution stuck in a situation where its one friend, the Soviet Union, falls to glasnost and ceases to be his nanny.
And if the “Chinese model” of continuing to be the world’s leader in executions in a dubious judicial system where capital offenses include tax fraud has thus far earned the plaudits of progressives and opportunist capitalists everywhere, the new Latin American leftist kingpin would be happy to see Cuba go in that direction.
Should we tell Jose Oscar Sanchez Madan, a journalist for Cubanet arrested and convicted on April 13, 2007, on the charge of being a “pre-criminal social danger,” that the Chinese model — where even more of his colleagues languish in prison — is acceptable change in Cuba?
Or how about Normando Hernandez Gonzalez, one of the dozens arrested during the “Black Spring” and serving a 25-year sentence for being director of the Independent Journalist Association of Camaguey? “My health is horrible,” Gonzalez wrote on Oct. 23, 2007, in a diary smuggled out of his prison and provided to Bloomberg. “The intestinal pain and cramps are unbearable. In the last four days I have lost 3 kilograms (6.8 pounds) … My God, don’t abandon me. Help me, please!”
The cries of the Chinese are no less harrowing. So when envisioning a model for Cuba’s future, why lean on tunnel vision of minute free-market reforms?
Why settle for anything less than democracy?
Bridget Johnson (Bridgetjohnson.org) is a columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News.
 |
 |
 |
Podcasts |  PJM Home |
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
2 Comments
1. d.k. allen:I would recommend they adopt the Chinese model for one reason: I believe the Chinese model is unsustainable, and will eventually result in the evolution of that country, into a state where individual liberties are expected and demanded by the next generation, and provided by a government with clearly no choice in the matter.
It will still be a long time coming, but I believe it is inevitable, so long as we continue to bombard them with examples of Western values, and the clear benefits of a truly open society.
Reagan won the cold war by pitting a free economy against a managed economy (and it looks as though that war might be fought again — Putin has apparently not learned that lesson) — that same strategy will work against China (modified to match differing details).
It looks as though it may work against Viet Nam. It will work against Cuba. It will work better, if we drop the trade embargoes (as we did with Viet Nam).
And, eventually, it will work against North Korea.
Ideally, each of these regimes will drop the repression, and find their way to freedom; but if they have to be kicked, dragging and spitting, by their own enlightened citizenry, so be it.
Once let in the door, economic, and individual freedom, will not be denied.
Feb 21, 2008 - 8:13 am 2. gcblues:1. latin countrys that have tried democracy often end up treated like dirt by the usa. columbia, just the latest example.
Feb 21, 2008 - 4:47 pm2. cuba and democracy is groovy and all, but the alba alliance is not a problem just because of the spread of communism. and that the usa has not recognized and respected emerging democracies in latin america, but because of the JFK gift that keeps on giving. foreign presence in the americas, like iran, rep of korea and china. wanna get worried, google monkey point nicragua iran.
it is pointless to advocate latin democracy and then treat them like dirt. i live in central america. i was in nicaragua today. myopia abounds in the usa in this regard. you might ask yourself how a thug like ortega can sell such stupid ideas to a relatively well educated not 3rd world country. pre JFK latin america, was not generally open to communism. what happened?