Email This to a Friend
New British Tax Exiles Aren’t Even British
The British government is imposing a new massive yearly tax on "non-doms" -- foreigners who live and work in the country but have claimed a non-domicile status as a resident for more than seven years. The result is likely to be a mass exodus - a blow, not a boon, to the British economy, writes Andrew Ian Dodge.
The City of London, the heart of finance in the UK, is preparing to up and leave the country. Well many of their number certainly are. And very soon. These people, referred to in the UK as “non-doms,” are beating a swift retreat from our island. The government eagerly awaits the introduction of a £30,000 yearly levy on anyone who has claimed non-domicile status as a UK resident for more than seven years. There are believed to be roughly 116,000 non-doms currently living in the UK.
The British government estimates that the new levy will raise £800 million annually for the Treasury. That is, of course, if any of the non-doms stick around long enough to pay the levy. Over half in a recent poll said they were leaving the UK before the April introduction of the tax.
So perturbed are some of the financiers in the City of London that they are actively wondering if the UK government really wants the business in their country. These men and women of money are balking at the idea of paying for the privilege of living in the UK and working in the City.
Americans are most affected by this charge because they will not be able to offset the fixed charge against their US taxes. Considering the current exchange rate, a $60,000 levy a year per person to stay in London is making for quite an exodus. Per person.
So worried are the City that Sir Digby Jones, former head of the Confederation of British Industry and member of Gordon Brown’s government, has questioned the tax and called for it to be scrapped. The Trade & Industry Secretary’s call has angered Labour’s paymasters in the unions who, in their unreconstructed socialist way, welcome the new tax. One has to wonder if Sir Jones will be able to remain in government should this legislation go through.
“A recent poll of advisers to wealthy clients showed that half of them were considering leaving the UK in response to the tax crackdown.”
Under Tony Blair’s leadership and premiership British government was relatively friendly to business bar the increasing regulation imposed due in part to European diktats. It seems that Gordon Brown is looking to the 1970s “Old Labour” playbook for ways of covering the increasingly wobbly UK finances. Targeting the City has always been a favorite of the unreconstructed socialist left who play on class warfare and envy.
The fact the levy will undermine London’s role as a chief financial center for Europe does not seem to bother those who are keen on this tax. They do not seem to realize or care that one of the reasons for the City of London’s continued success in the light of the changes in modern finance is its friendly tax regime for non-doms. This “loophole” needs to be closed and damn the consequences.
The non-dom flight will have knock-on effects throughout the UK economy; not the least in the property market which is already looking shaky thanks to the worldwide debt worries and the effective failure of Northern Rock. Many wonder aloud why Gordon Brown would introduce this tax legislation in the light of the obviously slowing British economy. The credit crunch will only be increased if a large number of the wealthy leave the UK taking their money with them.
In a recent report on the BBC, City folk were heard to remark that Monaco was a lot warmer than London.
It is unclear at this point if the government will succumb to the pressure that is being brought to bear on it by business and those who work in the City. The legislation clearly marks a bad sign in Britain’s friendliness to international capital and those who work in its industry.
Jonathan Taylor, director general of the London Investment Banking Association, said: “The more senior you go, the more prevalent foreigners are. In some large firms, 60pc of people in senior executive functions are non-British.
“Our concern as employers is our ability to attract and retain the staff essential to the health of London as an international financial centre.”
William Cash of the Business magazines reports the following about the panic surrounding this new tax, proposed only a few months before the introduction in April, 2008.
“The provisions will seek to tax people on historic gains made investing in Britain and elsewhere. Non-UK gains remitted to Britain will be taxable, regardless of the £30,000 payment – effective immediately. The burden will be on the remitter to prove there are no gains in any capital remitted, a serious accounting exercise and absolutely no fun for anybody. Beneficiaries of offshore trusts, meanwhile, will be asked to pay capital gains tax on distributions whether remitted to Britain or not.”
We will all have to wait to see if the “monied” flight will be as bad as it is predicted to be. The high cost of living in London, the increasing transport problems in London and other costs are already driving foreign Londoners away. This tax on those who are non-doms will just increase the flight of international residents out of the UK’s capital .
It will be a good spring for the moving men it seems.
Andrew Ian Dodge blogs at Dodgeblogium.
 |
 |
 |
Podcasts |  PJM Home |
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
8 Comments
1. John Swaine:Unfortunately, it must be disclosed that this tax was actually the brainchild of George Osborne, the Tory shadow Chancellor.
It seems more than a little ridiculous, although the Tories intended to use it to offset an abolition of lower income inheritance tax, it’s still a policy that’s far from conservative.
England has a massive public infrastructure and a public spending addiction to match. Instead of cutting taxes and cutting spending (a taboo in a nation where 30% of the population now work for the Public Sector), the Tories have decided to simply levy taxes against people who don’t vote.
Labour, seeing that it was a popular policy, have pinched it.
There is no voice in opposition to question the lunacy of this policy. It will almost certainly pass into law.
Feb 19, 2008 - 4:35 am 2. Andrew Ian Dodge:Well look at how they are reacting, or not, to the nationalisation of Northern Rock. They really have no clue what to do to counter the socialist movement of this government.
Feb 19, 2008 - 6:15 am 3. John A:The idea that the non-dom millionaires and billionaires who have “saved” billions of pounds of taxes that otherwise would be frittered away on UK schools, UK hospitals or prosecuting the War on Terror, will suddenly take flight because of a GBP30K flat tax, is simply risible.
I do question the de-facto nationalization of Northern Rock, and lots of other policies of the UK government. But this ain’t one of them.
Feb 19, 2008 - 9:49 pm 4. Curly Smith:I don’t see why you find the idea “risible”. The “non-doms” were attracted to London by a favorable tax policy so it stands to reason that they’d be “detracted” by an unfavorable tax policy. Money, and the people who manage it, are fungible and the only barrier to moving is cost. Would you care to wager on how many cities will offer incentives to entice the financiers away from London?
Feb 20, 2008 - 1:05 pm 5. Dave:Good grief. IT isn’t just millionaires and billionaires, it’s people who make several hundred thousand pounds, or dollars, per year, and who might have earned a million or two while doing this.
$60,000 is NOT chump change to these people. It’s a slap in the face, an INVITATION to leave.
Those who think that people of means just blithely absorb whatever new taxes are thrown at them have simply not observed them in the real world.
Feb 21, 2008 - 4:20 am 6. DA:I’m an American who has lived and worked in England for eleven years. Actually I work two jobs, full time in banking and part time as a University lecturer, tutoring finance Masters degree students.
I pay higher rate taxes on both paycheques, full NHS (in spite of having private insurance) and my Indefinite Leave to Remain is clearly stamped “no recourse to public funds”, which means I can’t go on the dole or ask for council accommodation.
And that’s ok. After I – and many like me – didn’t come here then DEMAND a flat with full benefits like the economic refugees we’re all familiar with.
From my back of the envelope calculation, I fully support – via taxes paid on money earned here in England – at least two and perhaps as many as three economic refugees.
But now I shift that burden to you good folks. I’ve quit my banking job effective March 31st, University will take until end of term to wind down and then I’m outta here.
So bend over and pay up. One of you folks remaining in England will now pay to support what previously were MY economic refugees.
And what’s even scarier? I’m effectively a middle wage earner, and there are LOTS more like me – many far, far more affluent – who either have already left or are in the process of leaving.
This poorly planned, ineptly and hastily executed move will achieve nothing except markedly raise taxes for those of you who still reside – and work – in England.
And just to follow up on Dave’s point above – I don’t consider this an invitation – that’s too polite a word. I’m an American country boy, and I know hospitality when it’s offered to me.
I also know when I’m not wanted.
Feb 23, 2008 - 5:39 am 7. Pajamas Media » Waves of Emigrants Leaving Britain:[...] to my recent piece on new regulations requiring annual payment of $60,000 (£30,000) for each non-domiciliary, the [...]
Jun 13, 2008 - 1:14 am 8. Sandrider:What’s with this “our island” stuff, Andy ? I know you’re having all kinds of visa problems, but you’re still a US citizen. I know you don’t have a wage-earning job, so this tax issue doesn’t really affect you one way or another. I understand your identity-crisis problem, but pretending to be a British Lord really isn’t going to help. You’re over 40 now, Andy. Time to put down the video games, cut your hair and grow up.
Dec 21, 2008 - 10:35 am