An Authoritarian Socialist Army that has been flying under the radar for years, and inspite of everything we now know the mainstream media is still not bringing to light the reality of how this entity that is Acorn has been nothing more than a terror cell who perpetrated this crisis with their anticapitalistic movement aimed to put socialism in its place by attacking capitalism to the point where we see it today on its knees today begging for our help and mercy.

You have nothing. Face it.

Certainly the most interesting and potentially devastating phone call I have received during this election cycle came this week from one of the Obama’s campaign internet geeks. These are the staffers who devised Obama’s internet fund raising campaign, which raised in the neighborhood of $200 million so far. That is more then twice the total funds raised by any candidate in history; and this was all from the internet campaign. 

 What I learned from this insider was shocking but I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that when it comes to fund raising there simply are no rules that can’t be broken and no ethics that prevail. 
 
Obama’s internet campaign started out innocently enough with basic e-mail networking, lists saved from previous party campaigns and from supporters who visited any of the Obama campaign web sites.
Small contributions came in from these sources and the internet campaign staff was more than pleased by the results. 

Then, about two months into the campaign the daily contribution intake multiplied. Where was it coming from? One of the web site security monitors began to notice the bulk of the contributions were clearly coming in from overseas internet service providers and at the rate and frequency of transmission it was clear these donations were “programmed” by a very sophisticated user. 

 While the security people were not able to track most of the sources due to firewalls and other blocking devices put on these contributions they were able to collate the number of contributions that were coming in seemingly from individuals but the funds were from only a few credit card accounts and bank electronic funds transfers. The internet service providers (ISP) they were able to trace were from Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries. One of the banks used for fund transfers was also located in Saudi Arabia. 
Another concentrated group of donations was traced to a Chinese ISP with a similar pattern of limited credit card charges. 

 It became clear that these donations were very likely coming from sources other than American voters. This was discussed at length within the campaign and the decision was made that none of these donations violated campaign-financing laws. 

It was also decided that it was not the responsibility of the campaign to audit these millions of contributions as to the actual source (specific credit card number or bank transfer account numbers) to insure that none of these internet contributors exceeded the legal maximum donation on a cumulative basis of many small donations. They also found the record keeping was not complete enough to do it anyway. 
 
This is a shocking revelation. 

 We have been concerned about the legality of “bundling” contributions after the recent exposure of illegal bundlers but now it appears we may have an even greater problem. 
 
I guess we should have been somewhat suspicious when the numbers started to come out. We were told (no proof offered) that the Obama internet contributions were from $10.00 to $25.00 or so. 

 If the $200,000,000 is right, and the average contribution was $15.00, that would mean over 13 million individuals made contributions? That would also be 13 million contributions would need to be processed. How did all that happen? 

I believe the Obama campaign’s internet fund raising needs a serious, in depth investigation and audit. It also appears the whole question of internet fund raising needs investigation by the legislature and perhaps new laws to insure it complies not only with the letter of these laws but the spirit as well.

YOU ARE MISUSING MY NAME AS IF IT WERE YOURS. You are so immature. As soon as you demonstrated this weakness of PJM to me, I WROTE THEM TO INFORM THEM OF THIS. I ADVISE YOU TO DO THE SAME, and to cease from your childish behavior IMMEDIATELY.

I spread info and I also welcome people to DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH. It’s people like you who spread propagandas without facts to solidify your claims – that in itself is propaganda, Ed.

Read Corsi’s “Obama Nation” and you will get a fuller picture of the cooperation between Obama and Ayers.

How convenient, also, that you neglect to mention Ayers continued endorsement of his actions. This is not an “old story.”

You spread propaganda, “Jeff.” SHAME ON YOU.

1) When William Ayers was a radical leftist who co-founded the Weatherman, committed heinous terrorist acts against the United States Capitol building and the Pentagon, his radical history was between 1968-1972. Here is his life story in Wikipedia below —

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

2) Between 1968-1972, Barack Obama was between ages 7-11 years old and did NOT know William Ayers. He was TOO YOUNG. Here is his life story in Wikipedia below —

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

3) Obama did not meet Ayers until 1995, 23 years after Ayers radical history. Obama was introduced to Ayers by Illinois State Senator Alice Palmer, as her chosen successor since she is stepping down from the Illinois state senate and running for Congress. Here is the story of the meeting in the link below —

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html

In closing, all these propagandas are false. Obama did not meet Ayers until 1995, as they ALL want to make people believe. Please do your own research before believing these ole timers. Obama’s proposal of “Change” for the better is a HUGE threat to them. They are all incapable of “Change” or even the slightest chance of accepting it. Think “Ed Wallis” in these posts. So here is my wisdom for everyone –

***Conservatism is the tired old need to hang on to the past while liberalism is a need for change for a brighter future.***

Oh, uneducated, misguided, and one track mind, Ed. Just embrace the possibility of “Change”. I know that you ole timers REALLY have a hard time with that while we, youngins, want any change that is better than the current Administration, and that is NOT McCain. People really should do their research carefully like me.