Terrorism? “Osama!”

Energy? “Osama!”

Gas prices? “Osama!”

Get the idea?

http://www.dailydanet.com/obama-list/

FOX News has learned that over the last 15 years, Trinity United Church has received at least $15 million in grants from the federal government — in other words, taxpayer money.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/02/obamas-ex-church-has-won-15m-in-federal-grant-money/

Obama says he wasn’t involved.

Solution: put out a lot of images of him shot from slightly above angle, next to tall guys (and, better yet, tall gals) – and he’s DONE.

It’s that simple.

Someone with access, please pass this along up.

Wow, appeal to ridicule, appeal to spite, and appeal to motive all in one statement.

It’s your imagination, Rick. You’re probably listening to too much Republican talk radio and reading too many right-wing news sites.

His “gaffe problem” is a fairly new creation of the Republican media pundits. Looks like you just jumped on the bandwagon.

HTTP://WWW.OBAMASGAFFES.BLOGSPOT.COM

I think “BronxNative’s” remark and your response embody exactly what I was referring to earlier – that suddenly (wink wink) there may be many “gaffes” with the intention to diffuse the impact of Obama’s lies and utterly incompetent errors. That is to say, he is creating the opportunity for his supporters to say that his lies and errrors are merely “gaffes.”

I have written extensively about Obama’s lies regarding Wright, Rezko, Ayers, and other matters.

Don’t presume to say I don’t know what I am writing about when you don’t know what I have written previously.

In your piece reporting on Barack’s mistatements and possible lies, you fail to mention Barack’s initial response to media reports on the outragious statements of his Reverend of 20 years, Reverend Wright.

Barack’s initial response was that he was not in the pews when his Reverend made these statements, and he was not previously aware of these statements.

Reverend Wright, during a later Q & A session with the National Press Club, responded when asked about Barack’s response that Barack is a politician in the middle of a campaign, and Barack’s response needed to be understood in that context.

In doing so, Reverend Wright made clear his view that at the very least Barack was aware that the Reverend had made those type of outragious statements in the past.

It was no surprise that Barack felt pushed into a corner at that point, and disowned Reverend Wright’s most extrememe statementsthe same exact day.

Especially in light of your position as “PJM Chicago editor” your failure to at least refer to this incident (you remebered to mention Hillary’s most egregious lie)goes beyond just shoddy reporting or political commentary.

It instead raises a serious question on whether you know what you are writing about.