Comments on: Palin and Pelosi: Worlds Apart in House-Cleaning Methodology

By: Thank You Sarah Palin | Midnight Blue Says

Thank You Sarah Palin | Midnight Blue Says — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:31:35 +0000

[...] Kyle-Anne Shiver lays out the case of what to expect from a Palin Presidency: In 2006, Nancy Pelosi became the first woman speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and the most powerful woman in American government. In that same year, Sarah Palin became the first woman governor of Alaska and its youngest ever. [...]

By: LORDSTRUTH

LORDSTRUTH — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:36:14 +0000

2 airbags

By: Jarhead68

Jarhead68 — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:10:52 +0000

Well, Kyle-Anne, I must say you outdid yourself again. This comparison of Sarah and Nancy is just spot-on. I noticed in all the comments from the leftists here that no one actually tried to compare Nancy’s good points against Sarah’s shortcomings. Maybe because they can’t find any good points about Nancy? Every negative comment to you, beside the Polish Putz’, were bashing Palin. I can’t recall anyone trying to defend Peloskyvitch. Job well done, La Belle des Sud.

By: tanstaafl

tanstaafl — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:23:17 +0000

Comparing Nancy Pelosi and Sarah Palin seems like comparing apples and oranges.

Sarah is the real deal, smart and able to think on her feet. Nancy is not very bright, is insecure & petty and hides behind pat phrases and blaming “the Bush administration” for damn near everything from “the oil crisis” to bad toenails.

Finally, several weeks ago, something occurred that Nancy couldn’t blame on “Bush” when she put her foot in her mouth over Saint Augustine and abortion. Catholic bishops and cardinals from coast to coast rained down on Pelosi’s “interpretation”.

Nancy couldn’t do much about that, but she would dearly like to quell any political criticism of her by reinstituting the (anti) Fairness Doctrine.

By: Will Becker

Will Becker — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:13:18 +0000

My friends,remember what you are voting for. Is it for the country,or is it because of a dislike of a certain candidate?Think about what’s good for America,like good and hard.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:46:06 +0000

Thank you for the comparison between the two.
You expressed my thinking eloquently.

In many respects I feel that Sarah Palin is the
only hope we have for getting our government
back on track. I just looked online for the
committee members of the banking committee headed by Chris Dodd. We need to get a petition
together to oust the lot, republicans and democrats alike. True reform will unfortunately be brutal, however it is necessary.

By: thegr8_1

thegr8_1 — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:31:52 +0000

Harry Reid’s worst nightmare a 50-50 tie in the Senate and Sarah Barracuda to break any ties. Pelosi and Reed are the two biggest doofusses ever, get out Pelosi and let Hillary run the show never thought I would say that being a conservative . Reed deserves to be buried in the Nevada desert and eaten by the vultures. Barack go back to being one of Richie Daley’s errand boys. Work on getting the Olympics to Chicago, you are in over your head running for POTUS.

By: Harry Bell

Harry Bell — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:37:52 +0000

This is a interesting thread. I’ve seen numerous comparisons to how Sarah Palin has conducted herself in office compared to Obama. I’ve not seen so many comparing her with the Pelosi record. The moon bats seem to object to this on the grounds that there can be no comparison. Has anyone taken the time to compare Sarah’s record as Mayor & Governor with, oh I don’t know, say Eliot Spitzer? It would be nice to contrast how the former AG and Gov of New York state lived up to his stated principles. The lionization by the liberal media when he was abusing the power of the AG’s office, their coverage during his recent unpleasantness and the double standard applied to the scrutiny of Sarah Palins record. Might be worth a column or two eh?

By: Ed Wallis

Ed Wallis — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:09:43 +0000

William,

Please go back and tell David Axelrod that he need to send in some replacement ASTROTURF WRITERS, as the few still here have been reduced to spewing vitriol and nonsense such as yours.

By: Ed Wallis

Ed Wallis — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:07:11 +0000

(for whatever reason, this was censored/not posted last evening…)

FROM:

http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2008/09/nytimes-in-2003-bush-proposed.html

EXCERPT:

“… Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

”These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

”I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,” Mr. Watt said.”