<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PJM Political 6/6/09: What Sort Of Man Still Reads Playboy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:14:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BettyBlue</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-280888</link>
		<dc:creator>BettyBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-280888</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t Hugh Hefner hang around with the skanks---er, girls next door these days?

How the mighty have fallen.  It&#039;s sad.  Kind&#039;ve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Hugh Hefner hang around with the skanks&#8212;er, girls next door these days?</p>
<p>How the mighty have fallen.  It&#8217;s sad.  Kind&#8217;ve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-279396</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-279396</guid>
		<description>What sort of Man &quot;reads&quot; Playboy? A pointless,macro egoistic,terminally hedonistic,disposable personality suffering from impotent satyriasis: Hugh Heffner.Which is to say:not a man at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sort of Man &#8220;reads&#8221; Playboy? A pointless,macro egoistic,terminally hedonistic,disposable personality suffering from impotent satyriasis: Hugh Heffner.Which is to say:not a man at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlet98</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-279064</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlet98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-279064</guid>
		<description>Rape, Abortion, and Bonnie Erbe&#039;--Part Two

Part One of this very mini series dealt primarily with the necessity of verifying sources before one believes anything read on the internet.  Another focus was Ms. Bonnie Erbe’s background and studied indifference as to the recent Playboy filth promoting the “hate-f***ing” of a number of prominent conservative women: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1048. 

Erbe’ is relatively prominent herself and I was attempting to determine what makes her tick in light of the view expressed in her article, published by ScrippsNews.com, that “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy.” 

Her non-reaction to the Playboy piece went a long way in clarifying her ticking.

She argued in “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy” that America’s current hard economic times are driving women to abortionists as they try to make do with less money.  As with “hate-f***ing” (conservative) women, Erbe’ adopts a blase’ attitude of, “So what!” or, as she writes, “The media have also been rife with stories portraying this trend as something of a tragedy. Let me propose a counter view: it is not.”

She supports her counter-proposal by offering the example of an unwed mother of three whose live-in significant other had lost his job.  The mother had weighed all her options and decided to abort her fourth child:  ”It’s actually a fact-based, rational decision that in the end benefits the three children they already have and society as well. . . It’s no tragedy: it’s a good decision.”

Erbe’ is a perfect representative of a liberal moral relativist, an obtuse, ignorant relativist, suggesting as she does that since times are tough and babies are expensive, why not just kill Number Four and all will be good for that mom, her boyfriend, and their progeny?  After all, then the loving couple will be better able to tend to their brood and will be less likely to have “to rely on scarce public resources to raise their children.”

What an awesome perspective!

She goes on to say, based on something or other, that, “Abortion was not viewed as a tragic event in the early days after the Supreme Court handed down its Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion on a national scale.”  The tragic essence of murdering a pre-born human being only gained tragic status after “the poster child” for pro-life, and the “Roe” in Roe v. Wade, became an advocate for life. 

To make things even worse, ”the media [has] become a trumpet for the pro-life message that abortion is always a tragedy.”

I understand Bonnie Erbe’ was born in New York City but on which planet she now resides is something of a mystery.  I have a slew of questions for her which, depending on her responses, will help establish whether she is or ever has been a bonafide Earthling:
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rape, Abortion, and Bonnie Erbe&#8217;&#8211;Part Two</p>
<p>Part One of this very mini series dealt primarily with the necessity of verifying sources before one believes anything read on the internet.  Another focus was Ms. Bonnie Erbe’s background and studied indifference as to the recent Playboy filth promoting the “hate-f***ing” of a number of prominent conservative women: <a href="http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1048" rel="nofollow">http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1048</a>. </p>
<p>Erbe’ is relatively prominent herself and I was attempting to determine what makes her tick in light of the view expressed in her article, published by ScrippsNews.com, that “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy.” </p>
<p>Her non-reaction to the Playboy piece went a long way in clarifying her ticking.</p>
<p>She argued in “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy” that America’s current hard economic times are driving women to abortionists as they try to make do with less money.  As with “hate-f***ing” (conservative) women, Erbe’ adopts a blase’ attitude of, “So what!” or, as she writes, “The media have also been rife with stories portraying this trend as something of a tragedy. Let me propose a counter view: it is not.”</p>
<p>She supports her counter-proposal by offering the example of an unwed mother of three whose live-in significant other had lost his job.  The mother had weighed all her options and decided to abort her fourth child:  ”It’s actually a fact-based, rational decision that in the end benefits the three children they already have and society as well. . . It’s no tragedy: it’s a good decision.”</p>
<p>Erbe’ is a perfect representative of a liberal moral relativist, an obtuse, ignorant relativist, suggesting as she does that since times are tough and babies are expensive, why not just kill Number Four and all will be good for that mom, her boyfriend, and their progeny?  After all, then the loving couple will be better able to tend to their brood and will be less likely to have “to rely on scarce public resources to raise their children.”</p>
<p>What an awesome perspective!</p>
<p>She goes on to say, based on something or other, that, “Abortion was not viewed as a tragic event in the early days after the Supreme Court handed down its Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion on a national scale.”  The tragic essence of murdering a pre-born human being only gained tragic status after “the poster child” for pro-life, and the “Roe” in Roe v. Wade, became an advocate for life. </p>
<p>To make things even worse, ”the media [has] become a trumpet for the pro-life message that abortion is always a tragedy.”</p>
<p>I understand Bonnie Erbe’ was born in New York City but on which planet she now resides is something of a mystery.  I have a slew of questions for her which, depending on her responses, will help establish whether she is or ever has been a bonafide Earthling:<br />
(Read the rest at <a href="http://genelalor.com)" rel="nofollow">http://genelalor.com)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlet98</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-279061</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlet98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-279061</guid>
		<description>Rape, Abortion, and Bonnie Erbe&#039;--Part One

 Know Thy Source, Especially Thy “Liberal” SourcePublished in June 8th, 2009 &#124; EditPosted by Berlet98 in ABORTION, AMERICAN CULTURE TODAYLet’s face it: Anyone with a computer can get “published” today, even the present writer.  That reality of internet life makes it critical to establish the credentials of the person or persons who author articles read on the web before buying into his or her philosophies and theses.

With that in mind, I felt it judicious to delve into the world of Bonnie Erbe’ after reading her provocatively-titled piece, “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy,” http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/42197.  One thing I discovered was that Ms. Bonnie is anything but “bonnie.”

For those such as I who must live sheltered existences and who are ignorant of who Ms. Erbe’ is, here’s the straight poop on her curriculum vitae: Aged 56, though her available photos such as this   lop off at least 10 of her years, Erbe’ is a NYC-born graduate of Barnard College, (1974), Columbia (M.S. in journalism, 1975), and Georgetown Law (1987).  

She is described by Wikipedia as “an American journalist and television host based in the Washington, D.C. area who has covered national politics since 1975,” which means, pretty impressively, that she has been so covering since she was 22.

Wikipedia goes on to say that Erbe’ is host and Chief Exec of the PBS program, “To the Contrary,” is a contributing (blog) editor at US News and World Report, and, oddly, serves as advisor to an immigration reduction organization, The Federation for American Immigration Reform.

Again, pretty impressive even if that’s the extent of Erbe’s Wikipedia entry.  Further research turns up other interesting details about Erbe’, including the factoid that her PBS show is the first in the nation to exclusively feature women discussing the news: http://www.pbs.org/ttc/about_host.html.

As they say, the plot, Erbe’s pro-abortion plot, thickens.

For those not Playboy aficionados as I was up to 30 years ago, (I read it for the articles!), when I caught my 5 year old son thumbing through its pages whilst sitting on the potty and I was forced by discretion and my wife to cancel my subscription, that much-changed publication recently ran an online article on who deserved to be raped. 

It turns out, go figure!, that all those chosen fantasy-rape victims in the Playboy piece,. . .
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rape, Abortion, and Bonnie Erbe&#8217;&#8211;Part One</p>
<p> Know Thy Source, Especially Thy “Liberal” SourcePublished in June 8th, 2009 | EditPosted by Berlet98 in ABORTION, AMERICAN CULTURE TODAYLet’s face it: Anyone with a computer can get “published” today, even the present writer.  That reality of internet life makes it critical to establish the credentials of the person or persons who author articles read on the web before buying into his or her philosophies and theses.</p>
<p>With that in mind, I felt it judicious to delve into the world of Bonnie Erbe’ after reading her provocatively-titled piece, “Abortion Is Not a Tragedy,” <a href="http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/42197" rel="nofollow">http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/42197</a>.  One thing I discovered was that Ms. Bonnie is anything but “bonnie.”</p>
<p>For those such as I who must live sheltered existences and who are ignorant of who Ms. Erbe’ is, here’s the straight poop on her curriculum vitae: Aged 56, though her available photos such as this   lop off at least 10 of her years, Erbe’ is a NYC-born graduate of Barnard College, (1974), Columbia (M.S. in journalism, 1975), and Georgetown Law (1987).  </p>
<p>She is described by Wikipedia as “an American journalist and television host based in the Washington, D.C. area who has covered national politics since 1975,” which means, pretty impressively, that she has been so covering since she was 22.</p>
<p>Wikipedia goes on to say that Erbe’ is host and Chief Exec of the PBS program, “To the Contrary,” is a contributing (blog) editor at US News and World Report, and, oddly, serves as advisor to an immigration reduction organization, The Federation for American Immigration Reform.</p>
<p>Again, pretty impressive even if that’s the extent of Erbe’s Wikipedia entry.  Further research turns up other interesting details about Erbe’, including the factoid that her PBS show is the first in the nation to exclusively feature women discussing the news: <a href="http://www.pbs.org/ttc/about_host.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/ttc/about_host.html</a>.</p>
<p>As they say, the plot, Erbe’s pro-abortion plot, thickens.</p>
<p>For those not Playboy aficionados as I was up to 30 years ago, (I read it for the articles!), when I caught my 5 year old son thumbing through its pages whilst sitting on the potty and I was forced by discretion and my wife to cancel my subscription, that much-changed publication recently ran an online article on who deserved to be raped. </p>
<p>It turns out, go figure!, that all those chosen fantasy-rape victims in the Playboy piece,. . .<br />
(Read the rest at <a href="http://genelalor.com)" rel="nofollow">http://genelalor.com)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-278951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-278951</guid>
		<description>19. Paul -Indiana:

LOL...that was funny!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19. Paul -Indiana:</p>
<p>LOL&#8230;that was funny!  <img src='http://pajamasmedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul -Indiana</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-278398</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul -Indiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-278398</guid>
		<description>I read it for the articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it for the articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Shaw</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-277372</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-277372</guid>
		<description>When Hugh Hefner passes away, will Playboy live on? I am certain it will live a good decade perhaps, but not much longer given the internet &amp; other sources. Playboy has to be revamped completely to survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hugh Hefner passes away, will Playboy live on? I am certain it will live a good decade perhaps, but not much longer given the internet &amp; other sources. Playboy has to be revamped completely to survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IB Bill</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-277197</link>
		<dc:creator>IB Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-277197</guid>
		<description>I used to read Playboy throughout the 80s, and read some back issues from the 70s, too. The magazine really changed. Before Reagan was elected, it had a great sense of humor and the models were truly &quot;girl next door&quot; types. As the 80s progressed, the magazine became more and more shrill, political, and repetitive. (At times, the magazine could be positively vicious.) The girls also became less girl next door and more like archetypes -- they seemed to have blondes about two-thirds of the time, and made them look the same. They seemed more unattainable. It really lost its sense of fun. 

I think two things came into play -- 

1. The fundamental &quot;Playboy philosophy&quot; was demonstrating itself to be self-contradictory nonsense. Before that happened, the hedonistic and &quot;good life&quot; revolution was enormously fun and seemed harmless. But throughout the 80s, it was showing itself to be anything but harmelss, sparking a counter-revolution. And Playboy&#039;s editors couldn&#039;t admit it.

2. They had an editors who seemed less confident and less honest. They went into a formulaic mode. (Apparently, a lot of the editors were women, btw.) They seemed out of touch, and less interested in freedom (the initial philosophy, if libertine) and more PC in many areas, while viciously defending its turf in others (sexual license).

In the end, the magazine proved itself to be for children who couldn&#039;t hear &quot;no&quot; without freaking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to read Playboy throughout the 80s, and read some back issues from the 70s, too. The magazine really changed. Before Reagan was elected, it had a great sense of humor and the models were truly &#8220;girl next door&#8221; types. As the 80s progressed, the magazine became more and more shrill, political, and repetitive. (At times, the magazine could be positively vicious.) The girls also became less girl next door and more like archetypes &#8212; they seemed to have blondes about two-thirds of the time, and made them look the same. They seemed more unattainable. It really lost its sense of fun. </p>
<p>I think two things came into play &#8212; </p>
<p>1. The fundamental &#8220;Playboy philosophy&#8221; was demonstrating itself to be self-contradictory nonsense. Before that happened, the hedonistic and &#8220;good life&#8221; revolution was enormously fun and seemed harmless. But throughout the 80s, it was showing itself to be anything but harmelss, sparking a counter-revolution. And Playboy&#8217;s editors couldn&#8217;t admit it.</p>
<p>2. They had an editors who seemed less confident and less honest. They went into a formulaic mode. (Apparently, a lot of the editors were women, btw.) They seemed out of touch, and less interested in freedom (the initial philosophy, if libertine) and more PC in many areas, while viciously defending its turf in others (sexual license).</p>
<p>In the end, the magazine proved itself to be for children who couldn&#8217;t hear &#8220;no&#8221; without freaking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-276727</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-276727</guid>
		<description>Donna V,


I said this issue/release.  It will be a one time spike, but the young adults who like that show will be curious and will purchase a copy when it first comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna V,</p>
<p>I said this issue/release.  It will be a one time spike, but the young adults who like that show will be curious and will purchase a copy when it first comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Perron</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pjm-political-6609-what-sort-of-man-still-reads-playboy/comment-page-1/#comment-276678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Perron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=58040#comment-276678</guid>
		<description>Playboy ? Is it still being published ? What about it&#039;s even more infantile imitator Penthouse, is it still around ? ... Allah Akbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playboy ? Is it still being published ? What about it&#8217;s even more infantile imitator Penthouse, is it still around ? &#8230; Allah Akbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
