<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President-Elect Obama Faces a Dangerous World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:03:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-3/#comment-156168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-156168</guid>
		<description>Europe is full of left wing maniacs who have no idea what the real world (or even the real USA) is like. They are raised on a steady diet of antiAmerican marxism force fed to them by power hungry political cretons. Funny that euros like to preach to Americans about fairness when their entire system is still shaped on the idea that power should come from the top down. Pathetic dweebs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europe is full of left wing maniacs who have no idea what the real world (or even the real USA) is like. They are raised on a steady diet of antiAmerican marxism force fed to them by power hungry political cretons. Funny that euros like to preach to Americans about fairness when their entire system is still shaped on the idea that power should come from the top down. Pathetic dweebs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-3/#comment-148851</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-148851</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s carnival time in the good &#039;ol USA together with an affirmative action lord of misrule, to direct his demagogue fodder,cretins in a farce called:&quot;The decline of the US.&quot; Watch it! Live it! Love it! Leave it! End it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s carnival time in the good &#8216;ol USA together with an affirmative action lord of misrule, to direct his demagogue fodder,cretins in a farce called:&#8221;The decline of the US.&#8221; Watch it! Live it! Love it! Leave it! End it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesy55</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-3/#comment-148512</link>
		<dc:creator>jonesy55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-148512</guid>
		<description>Susan, I&#039;ve no idea if the article in the telegraph is 100% accurate or not, maybe it is, maybe the newspaper is misrepresenting the facts because it has an agenda and it knows what its readers like to read, it wouldn&#039;t be the first time.

What I do no for A FACT is that the area in question is not a &#039;no-go area&#039; for non-muslims because I have been there on many occassions myself, have you?? No, I thought not. It is predominantly Asian and most of those Asians are muslim but if you took the time to move away from your keyboard and venture into the real world for a few moments, you would see plenty of non-muslims walking down Alum Roack Road, doing their shopping, going about their daily business.

Even if the story is 100% accurate, it just proves that 1 policeman is an idiot.

It is difficult to take anything you say seriously when you claim to know exactly how 1.2 billion people around the world think and what their motives and opinions are despite not personally knowing any of them. You will have to forgive me for being sceptaical of your claims and preferring the evidence I see first hand in my life.

And yes, it is quite clear that there are no sharia courts in the UK. There are Sharia based arbitration systems for civil matters such as inheritance, dispute resolution etc, just as there are jewish arbitration systems for civil matters that people can choose to use if both parties agree. In fact arbitration can use any set of principles if both parties agree, this is nothing new. You can even find a similar set-up in Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, I&#8217;ve no idea if the article in the telegraph is 100% accurate or not, maybe it is, maybe the newspaper is misrepresenting the facts because it has an agenda and it knows what its readers like to read, it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p>
<p>What I do no for A FACT is that the area in question is not a &#8216;no-go area&#8217; for non-muslims because I have been there on many occassions myself, have you?? No, I thought not. It is predominantly Asian and most of those Asians are muslim but if you took the time to move away from your keyboard and venture into the real world for a few moments, you would see plenty of non-muslims walking down Alum Roack Road, doing their shopping, going about their daily business.</p>
<p>Even if the story is 100% accurate, it just proves that 1 policeman is an idiot.</p>
<p>It is difficult to take anything you say seriously when you claim to know exactly how 1.2 billion people around the world think and what their motives and opinions are despite not personally knowing any of them. You will have to forgive me for being sceptaical of your claims and preferring the evidence I see first hand in my life.</p>
<p>And yes, it is quite clear that there are no sharia courts in the UK. There are Sharia based arbitration systems for civil matters such as inheritance, dispute resolution etc, just as there are jewish arbitration systems for civil matters that people can choose to use if both parties agree. In fact arbitration can use any set of principles if both parties agree, this is nothing new. You can even find a similar set-up in Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-3/#comment-147256</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-147256</guid>
		<description>Prove that the article of the daily telegraph is not true. There is no sharia courts in the uk, a jew was not 

Oh yeah... you can&#039;t. It is not my fault that the majority of british &quot;press&quot; (and I use the term loosely) is intellectually prostituted to the muslim cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prove that the article of the daily telegraph is not true. There is no sharia courts in the uk, a jew was not </p>
<p>Oh yeah&#8230; you can&#8217;t. It is not my fault that the majority of british &#8220;press&#8221; (and I use the term loosely) is intellectually prostituted to the muslim cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evidence Based Spouting</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-147043</link>
		<dc:creator>Evidence Based Spouting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-147043</guid>
		<description>Jeez, Susan if you are getting you information from the Daily Telegraph maybe you should read a better quality unbiased sources, before posting. The Telegraph is Tabloid crap designed to appeal to folks with limited intellectual capacity! QED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, Susan if you are getting you information from the Daily Telegraph maybe you should read a better quality unbiased sources, before posting. The Telegraph is Tabloid crap designed to appeal to folks with limited intellectual capacity! QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Garrett</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-146935</link>
		<dc:creator>M Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-146935</guid>
		<description>Bob L. Sorry Bob, forgot you asked for this &#039;whale&#039; to spout! The guy who is being protected by the USA, while wanted for a civilian plane bomb, is called Luis Posada Carriles. Completely &#039;coincidentally&#039; (of course) he is a former CIA employee. The 79-year-old is wanted by two Latin American states for masterminding the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner, in which 73 innocent civilians died. He is also being investigated for the 1997 bombing of a hotel in the Cuban capital, Havana, which killed an Italian tourist. (Can I hear the rabid brigade shouting: &quot;Serves him right for having his holiday in Cuba!&quot;)He was jailed in Venezuela in 1976 after being found guilty of bombing the Cuban plane, then in 1985 Posada escaped (mmm, wonder how, old CIA friends maybe?) and is now living in that bastion of the &#039;war on terror&#039;, the US of A! So is George W right? Should we treat any state which harbors a terrorist as a terrorist state? 
Secondly, three employees of the NatWest Bank, in the UK, were extradited because of alleged fraud, without needing a court hearing here. I have no idea if they were guilty or not, but the American courts found them guilty and jailed them The point is, if the situation were in reverse, and the UK wanted to extradite three American bankers they would be protected (because of US constitutional law). Maybe you think that is fair (I&#039;m sure the rabid brigade would find some reason to justify this), but for many of us, it smacks of good old double standards. One law for you, one law for us. And that, I contend, is a result of the very American exceptionalism I mentioned in my first post. Within the last month, the US military refused to provide any eye-witness evidence to the UK inquest into the friendly-fire death of three UK servicemen. Can you put your hand on your heart and tell me that under the reversed circumstances, the USA would be comfortable with that? So my question to America would be: &quot;On exactly what basis do you believe you are SUCH a special nation, that rules accepted by most of the world as rational and humane, should not have to apply to you?&quot;
 
Hope that clarifies the point. From a non-marxist, non-muslim, non-Jewish, non-communist, non-anti-american, non-anti-semite, non-burka wearing, non- Trotskist, er, and any of the other categories that for some reason, people keep labelling me with. (Just to be clear)

BTW, Apologies if this is repeated twice, it appeared to have gone missing the first time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob L. Sorry Bob, forgot you asked for this &#8216;whale&#8217; to spout! The guy who is being protected by the USA, while wanted for a civilian plane bomb, is called Luis Posada Carriles. Completely &#8216;coincidentally&#8217; (of course) he is a former CIA employee. The 79-year-old is wanted by two Latin American states for masterminding the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner, in which 73 innocent civilians died. He is also being investigated for the 1997 bombing of a hotel in the Cuban capital, Havana, which killed an Italian tourist. (Can I hear the rabid brigade shouting: &#8220;Serves him right for having his holiday in Cuba!&#8221;)He was jailed in Venezuela in 1976 after being found guilty of bombing the Cuban plane, then in 1985 Posada escaped (mmm, wonder how, old CIA friends maybe?) and is now living in that bastion of the &#8216;war on terror&#8217;, the US of A! So is George W right? Should we treat any state which harbors a terrorist as a terrorist state?<br />
Secondly, three employees of the NatWest Bank, in the UK, were extradited because of alleged fraud, without needing a court hearing here. I have no idea if they were guilty or not, but the American courts found them guilty and jailed them The point is, if the situation were in reverse, and the UK wanted to extradite three American bankers they would be protected (because of US constitutional law). Maybe you think that is fair (I&#8217;m sure the rabid brigade would find some reason to justify this), but for many of us, it smacks of good old double standards. One law for you, one law for us. And that, I contend, is a result of the very American exceptionalism I mentioned in my first post. Within the last month, the US military refused to provide any eye-witness evidence to the UK inquest into the friendly-fire death of three UK servicemen. Can you put your hand on your heart and tell me that under the reversed circumstances, the USA would be comfortable with that? So my question to America would be: &#8220;On exactly what basis do you believe you are SUCH a special nation, that rules accepted by most of the world as rational and humane, should not have to apply to you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hope that clarifies the point. From a non-marxist, non-muslim, non-Jewish, non-communist, non-anti-american, non-anti-semite, non-burka wearing, non- Trotskist, er, and any of the other categories that for some reason, people keep labelling me with. (Just to be clear)</p>
<p>BTW, Apologies if this is repeated twice, it appeared to have gone missing the first time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-146933</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-146933</guid>
		<description>Bob L. Sorry Bob, forgot you asked for this &#039;whale&#039; to spout! The guy who is being protected by the USA, while wanted for a civilian plane bomb, is called Luis Posada Carriles. Completely &#039;coincidentally&#039; (of course) he is a former CIA employee. The 79-year-old is wanted by two Latin American states for masterminding the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner, in which 73 innocent civilians died. He is also being investigated for the 1997 bombing of a hotel in the Cuban capital, Havana, which killed an Italian tourist. (Can I hear the rabid brigade shouting: &quot;Serves him right for having his holiday in Cuba!&quot;)He was jailed in Venezuela in 1976 after being found guilty of bombing the Cuban plane, then in 1985 Posada escaped (mmm, wonder how, old CIA friends maybe?) and is now living in that bastion of the &#039;war on terror&#039;, the US of A! So is George W right? Should we treat any state which harbors a terrorist as a terrorist state? 
Secondly, three employees of the NatWest Bank, in the UK, were extradited because of alleged fraud, without needing a court hearing here. I have no idea if they were guilty or not, but the American courts found them guilty and jailed them The point is, if the situation were in reverse, and the UK wanted to extradite three American bankers they would be protected (because of US constitutional law). Maybe you think that is fair (I&#039;m sure the rabid brigade would find some reason to justify this), but for many of us, it smacks of good old double standards. One law for you, one law for us. And that, I contend, is a result of the very American exceptionalism I mentioned in my first post. Within the last month, the US military refused to provide any eye-witness evidence to the UK inquest into the friendly-fire death of three UK servicemen. Can you put your hand on your heart and tell me that under the reversed circumstances, the USA would be comfortable with that? So my question to America would be: &quot;On exactly what basis do you believe you are SUCH a special nation, that rules accepted by most of the world as rational and humane, should not have to apply to you?&quot;
 
Hope that clarifies the point. From a non-marxist, non-muslim, non-Jewish, non-communist, non-anti-american, non-anti-semite, non-burka wearing, non- Trotskist, er, and any of the other categories that for some reason, people keep labelling me with. (Just to be clear)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob L. Sorry Bob, forgot you asked for this &#8216;whale&#8217; to spout! The guy who is being protected by the USA, while wanted for a civilian plane bomb, is called Luis Posada Carriles. Completely &#8216;coincidentally&#8217; (of course) he is a former CIA employee. The 79-year-old is wanted by two Latin American states for masterminding the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner, in which 73 innocent civilians died. He is also being investigated for the 1997 bombing of a hotel in the Cuban capital, Havana, which killed an Italian tourist. (Can I hear the rabid brigade shouting: &#8220;Serves him right for having his holiday in Cuba!&#8221;)He was jailed in Venezuela in 1976 after being found guilty of bombing the Cuban plane, then in 1985 Posada escaped (mmm, wonder how, old CIA friends maybe?) and is now living in that bastion of the &#8216;war on terror&#8217;, the US of A! So is George W right? Should we treat any state which harbors a terrorist as a terrorist state?<br />
Secondly, three employees of the NatWest Bank, in the UK, were extradited because of alleged fraud, without needing a court hearing here. I have no idea if they were guilty or not, but the American courts found them guilty and jailed them The point is, if the situation were in reverse, and the UK wanted to extradite three American bankers they would be protected (because of US constitutional law). Maybe you think that is fair (I&#8217;m sure the rabid brigade would find some reason to justify this), but for many of us, it smacks of good old double standards. One law for you, one law for us. And that, I contend, is a result of the very American exceptionalism I mentioned in my first post. Within the last month, the US military refused to provide any eye-witness evidence to the UK inquest into the friendly-fire death of three UK servicemen. Can you put your hand on your heart and tell me that under the reversed circumstances, the USA would be comfortable with that? So my question to America would be: &#8220;On exactly what basis do you believe you are SUCH a special nation, that rules accepted by most of the world as rational and humane, should not have to apply to you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hope that clarifies the point. From a non-marxist, non-muslim, non-Jewish, non-communist, non-anti-american, non-anti-semite, non-burka wearing, non- Trotskist, er, and any of the other categories that for some reason, people keep labelling me with. (Just to be clear)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-146888</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-146888</guid>
		<description>of course garet likes jonesy, they are both clueless and live in total denial. It&#039;s almost incredible how you are unable to address a single issue. Not even one. Not a single attempt to disprove.

we have 2 drug addicts on the thread. Go and shoot up your dose somewhere else.

So muslims are such a tiny minority in the uk, so if they are able to establish sharia courts and be above the law like they do it really means that you british are entirely dhimmified and more than collapsed.

Garet, I would prescribe you to grow a pair and stop being a whiny sissy, but spine and courage cannot be bought or taught, that&#039;s why you will always be a total loser.

And the racist should be directed to people like yourself who wish a total defeat for israel. What do you call it? oh yeah, disgusting anti-semitism. We thought it was over but people like yourself will always be ready to sell the jews like it happened in the 30s with Hitler and his muslim friends.

It must suck to be you, immensely.

PS, it must be you and the other idiot who leave free and democratic lands to fly to &quot;liberal&quot; places. I told you already, most of europe is going right, so it&#039;s time that you pick up your bag and go to Cuba or North Korea.

That is the liberal you deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course garet likes jonesy, they are both clueless and live in total denial. It&#8217;s almost incredible how you are unable to address a single issue. Not even one. Not a single attempt to disprove.</p>
<p>we have 2 drug addicts on the thread. Go and shoot up your dose somewhere else.</p>
<p>So muslims are such a tiny minority in the uk, so if they are able to establish sharia courts and be above the law like they do it really means that you british are entirely dhimmified and more than collapsed.</p>
<p>Garet, I would prescribe you to grow a pair and stop being a whiny sissy, but spine and courage cannot be bought or taught, that&#8217;s why you will always be a total loser.</p>
<p>And the racist should be directed to people like yourself who wish a total defeat for israel. What do you call it? oh yeah, disgusting anti-semitism. We thought it was over but people like yourself will always be ready to sell the jews like it happened in the 30s with Hitler and his muslim friends.</p>
<p>It must suck to be you, immensely.</p>
<p>PS, it must be you and the other idiot who leave free and democratic lands to fly to &#8220;liberal&#8221; places. I told you already, most of europe is going right, so it&#8217;s time that you pick up your bag and go to Cuba or North Korea.</p>
<p>That is the liberal you deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Garrett</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-146867</link>
		<dc:creator>M Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-146867</guid>
		<description>Like the cut of your jib jonesy55. Impressed by your grasp of detail. I see mad Susan is still on her rant. One minute she accuses me of &#039;despising Europe&#039; and then she lists all the awful things SHE despises about Europe. Do you get the impression she might be a tad schizophrenic. Her constant harping-on about Muslims (who make up such a tiny minority here)borders on the obsessive. I would prescribe a massive dose of Chlorpromazine and Lithium. Better still, Susan, why don&#039;t you just abandon ship and go and live somewhere in the world where people share your racist views, and leave those of us (like jonesy and Danny) to enjoy the wonderful liberal land we live in. Thanks to all the folk who have made this an interesting debate but it has become just page after page of mad-Susan-rant so I am leaving now. Bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the cut of your jib jonesy55. Impressed by your grasp of detail. I see mad Susan is still on her rant. One minute she accuses me of &#8216;despising Europe&#8217; and then she lists all the awful things SHE despises about Europe. Do you get the impression she might be a tad schizophrenic. Her constant harping-on about Muslims (who make up such a tiny minority here)borders on the obsessive. I would prescribe a massive dose of Chlorpromazine and Lithium. Better still, Susan, why don&#8217;t you just abandon ship and go and live somewhere in the world where people share your racist views, and leave those of us (like jonesy and Danny) to enjoy the wonderful liberal land we live in. Thanks to all the folk who have made this an interesting debate but it has become just page after page of mad-Susan-rant so I am leaving now. Bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/president-elect-obama-faces-a-dangerous-world/comment-page-2/#comment-146716</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=38188#comment-146716</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t see any moral collapse around me, I see some social problems as I do in every country in the world, unless you can show me some paradise that i am unaware of. But not the general moral decline that you distant observers see through the prism of the right wing press. 90%+ of people are perfectly decent, law-abiding citizens&quot;

the uk has got the highest number of teen pregnancies of europe.

this might not be technical moral decline but it is damn close.

And you obviously think that the attacks to muslims are  not motivated? I mean what was the name of that preacher with the hook?

Entirely not-motivated.

the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.

And I stick to my point. If you leave your country in droves it means that it has nothing to offer.

&quot;Every day I talk to regular muslims and see that they are normal people, do you?&quot;

the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.

&quot;Name me some of these no-go areas, I think you’ll find that people go into them all the time.&quot;

the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1574694/Bishop-warns-of-no-go-zones-for-non-Muslims.html

But of course, Michael Nazir-Ali cannot be right, he is a christian!!!

Don&#039;t believe the priest?

Let&#039;s see what the police is saying

A police community support officer ordered two Christian preachers to stop handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham.

The evangelists say they were threatened with arrest for committing a &quot;hate crime&quot; and were told they risked being beaten up if they returned. 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2058935/Police-advise-Christian-preachers-to-leave-Muslin-area-of-Birmingham.html

Denial is not only a river in Egypt. This stuff is CRAZY beyond belief, it defies common sense. Maybe you should look at what is happening in YOUR country instead of wasting our time in a republican oriented forum.

Even the French people in the 30s felt that there was  nothing strange that a bunch of germans were marching in paris.

I do not think that it is possible to reason with you, you see the world with rose tinted glasses, self-loathing and stockholm syndrome, you will deny that there is a problem till death.

Anyway, I see that nobody even dare to touch the thorny subject of the non-muslim population living in muslim countries that is treated as second class human beings and DE facto lives in a religious apartheid.

Why in your opinion, when they move to the UK they change 180 degrees? Of course it&#039;s not true, they don&#039;t change.

the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.

&quot;Well which is it, you said before that this was the reason that people were leaving and now when presented with the facts&quot;

Which facts?

Considering what is the athmosphere in the UK, I would FEAR to say publicly that muslims get a preferential treatment.

They can incite hate as they please unpunished (see &quot;behead anybody who insult islam&quot; and similar ads on display) but can the local population do the same?

the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.

I read the telegraph.co.uk and everytime the comments session is open you read of people enraged of the differential treatment they receive.

Those are a silent minority that understood the problem but don&#039;t know how to solve it. It seems that unlike other countries in europe, your political establishment is cuddling the muslim minority.

Oh, but your friends are so nice.

I bet they find nothing wrong in killing an apostate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t see any moral collapse around me, I see some social problems as I do in every country in the world, unless you can show me some paradise that i am unaware of. But not the general moral decline that you distant observers see through the prism of the right wing press. 90%+ of people are perfectly decent, law-abiding citizens&#8221;</p>
<p>the uk has got the highest number of teen pregnancies of europe.</p>
<p>this might not be technical moral decline but it is damn close.</p>
<p>And you obviously think that the attacks to muslims are  not motivated? I mean what was the name of that preacher with the hook?</p>
<p>Entirely not-motivated.</p>
<p>the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.</p>
<p>And I stick to my point. If you leave your country in droves it means that it has nothing to offer.</p>
<p>&#8220;Every day I talk to regular muslims and see that they are normal people, do you?&#8221;</p>
<p>the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.</p>
<p>&#8220;Name me some of these no-go areas, I think you’ll find that people go into them all the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1574694/Bishop-warns-of-no-go-zones-for-non-Muslims.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1574694/Bishop-warns-of-no-go-zones-for-non-Muslims.html</a></p>
<p>But of course, Michael Nazir-Ali cannot be right, he is a christian!!!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe the priest?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what the police is saying</p>
<p>A police community support officer ordered two Christian preachers to stop handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham.</p>
<p>The evangelists say they were threatened with arrest for committing a &#8220;hate crime&#8221; and were told they risked being beaten up if they returned. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2058935/Police-advise-Christian-preachers-to-leave-Muslin-area-of-Birmingham.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2058935/Police-advise-Christian-preachers-to-leave-Muslin-area-of-Birmingham.html</a></p>
<p>Denial is not only a river in Egypt. This stuff is CRAZY beyond belief, it defies common sense. Maybe you should look at what is happening in YOUR country instead of wasting our time in a republican oriented forum.</p>
<p>Even the French people in the 30s felt that there was  nothing strange that a bunch of germans were marching in paris.</p>
<p>I do not think that it is possible to reason with you, you see the world with rose tinted glasses, self-loathing and stockholm syndrome, you will deny that there is a problem till death.</p>
<p>Anyway, I see that nobody even dare to touch the thorny subject of the non-muslim population living in muslim countries that is treated as second class human beings and DE facto lives in a religious apartheid.</p>
<p>Why in your opinion, when they move to the UK they change 180 degrees? Of course it&#8217;s not true, they don&#8217;t change.</p>
<p>the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well which is it, you said before that this was the reason that people were leaving and now when presented with the facts&#8221;</p>
<p>Which facts?</p>
<p>Considering what is the athmosphere in the UK, I would FEAR to say publicly that muslims get a preferential treatment.</p>
<p>They can incite hate as they please unpunished (see &#8220;behead anybody who insult islam&#8221; and similar ads on display) but can the local population do the same?</p>
<p>the drug addict rarely admits he has a problem.</p>
<p>I read the telegraph.co.uk and everytime the comments session is open you read of people enraged of the differential treatment they receive.</p>
<p>Those are a silent minority that understood the problem but don&#8217;t know how to solve it. It seems that unlike other countries in europe, your political establishment is cuddling the muslim minority.</p>
<p>Oh, but your friends are so nice.</p>
<p>I bet they find nothing wrong in killing an apostate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
