Comments on: Republicans Should Kick Sanford to the Curb

By: ddc

ddc — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:36:51 +0000

I really can no longer be a Republican. I give up trying to support the unsupportable.

The party hypocracy is off the charts. There is nothing to believe in anymore. Boxing themselves into a corner on a Conservative passtime such as watching OTHER’S Families only to find out later how they covered-up the cannibalization of their own young in an effort to “escape” their OWN Family is not what I would call people or a party I can believe in.

The Republican party has become the party of losers. Sadly it deserves it.

By: WR Jonas

WR Jonas — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:35:52 +0000

To poster named tanslaafl; I have read many comments by you and I am not sure ,as if one ever is, if you are who you seem to be. You write with a great degree of assurance that your superior knowledge and perspective gives your opinion weight and credibility.
I wish to correct a mistaken assumption you have expressed. That is that God ( no quotes ) will judge you and he will not judge you harshly.
He will not judge you , for all judgment is placed in the hands of his Son Jesus Christ. It is he whom you should consider, for he is ready to forgive all who call upon him . It is up to you make that decision. It is a momentous thing and requires the surrender of ones ego and pride.
You can receive Him and know your salvation has been assured or you may doubt your whole life. But inevitably you are the responsible party.

By: sheesh

sheesh — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:08:38 +0000

There’s no room left at the curb . . . it’s littered with family values conservatives.

By: David Levavi

David Levavi — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:00:55 +0000

41. myth buster:

When you learn Hebrew and are properly equipped to read the Hebrew Bible, come back and talk to me, fool. And the name is Levavi. Translates to Hearty or Hardy in the latter day spelling.

By: David Levavi

David Levavi — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:58:20 +0000

41. myth buster:

When you learn Hebrew and are properly equipped to read the Hebrew Bible, come back and talk to me, fool.

By: uburoisc

uburoisc — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:54:48 +0000

If I tried to take a trip to Vegas to get busy with my girlfriend, and then wrote the trip off as company business, I would expect to be be fired for it. My employers would not be sympathetic to what would clearly be an attempt to defraud them, and would not be placated if I offered to repay them after I was busted for it; they would never trust me again. Can him.

By: Bad Karma

Bad Karma — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:30:55 +0000

Which is why we should bounce right back at them. Has Sanford done a decent job? Has he met the expectations of his position? The Democrats are famous for not only letting the exploits of their people slide, but celebrate it. Was Sanford wrong, absolutely, but why is the right always badgered when these incidents happen, yet they celebrate the actions of Ted “the swimmer”, JFK, Frank, and the list goes on. If the people want him to step down, then so be it, if not, move on.

By: larry hagedon

larry hagedon — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:19:56 +0000

I am a lifelong Conservative and I say Sanford needs to be impeached immediately. Going back to American Family Values is the only thing that will save the Republican Party.

By: Meryl

Meryl — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:51:50 +0000

It’s getting tiresome and silly.

Forget that Sanford committed adultery. Even for those opposed to adultery, that is not the problem that should remove him here.

Just think “secular ethics” (since our schools now pretend to be in a favor of “character-building” since they no longer allow “God-talk” about not lying and stuff)….

Secular ethics isn’t real big on:

1. Chief officer of a State disappearing deliberately.
2. Chief officer of a State lying about his whereabouts.
3. Chief officer of a State lying to his staff.
4. Chief officer os a State completely abdicating his responsibilities and leaving the country, for crying out loud, without turning his authority over to his second.

THESE are the reasons he needs to be thrown on his rear end. It has nothing to do with Argentina or Mrs. Sanford or e-mails.

He’s an undependable, selfish, lying, irresponsible individual who is willing to violate his oath of office just because he needs some space.

Just pretend he went backpacking in Peru all by himself, for the same period of time. Everything I have said still applies. It’s not about adultery or personal sin.

By: Will

Will — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:47:05 +0000

HE SHOULD GO RIGHT NOW !!!!