Didn’t one of the “big people” write a book about killing Bush. That was ok??

“Change the subject when the facts don’t fit your theory.”

I’m still waiting for someone to share the “facts” that don’t fit. When the responses I get equate getting spit on with fatal gunshot wounds, for some reason I feel like my view is vindicated. Perhaps you have some different facts to cite?

Peace.

DS

That’s exactly the kind of weaseling I expected from you, “David S”. Nothing you say about the GOP has any “control group” or “variables”. Yes, this is just one statistical data point, but you don’t have *any* data points except a small number of random incidents you use to demonize the GOP. I can easily pick the same for Democrats, going back to Crown Heights and Jesse Jackson’s presidential campaigns, just to name a few.

“If you want to talk about the causes and sources of large-scale political violence, that’s a different issue.”

Change the subject when the facts don’t fit your theory.

http://www.targetofopportunity.com/coronado.htm

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004264738_webuwarson06m.html

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1303

Your answer is a nonsequitor. You fail to address the convergence of von Brunn’s and Progressive’s views.

If you are claiming to be Jewish then it is as a Jew by ancestry only. Your kind of Jew alway try to out-socialists the other socialists because you are begging to be accepted. Deborah Schussel, who I can’t stand, calls people like you suicide Jews because you sell out your own people and die in the end anyway. You are just like the Jews who went right along with the Party line during the period of the Soviet-Nazi alliance.

Thanks.

Peace.

DS

It’s all in the definition of leftwing isn’t it? James von Brunn may have been a white supremisist but you will find that his views are found in the mainstream left. All he had to do is shout “Long Live Palestine! as he pulled the trigger and you would have called him a hero.

White supremicists can be left wing and for the most part are. The British National Party is clearly a white racist party but they are solidly on the left. Their political program was to the left of British Labor. The truth is that anti-Semitism is a mainstream leftwing disease and alway has been. To argue that the Democrats aren’t the locus of anti-Semitism in the US shows that you are an ant-Semite but we already knew that.

“Dave S, you didn’t answer me. Because you couldn’t. The linked article shows that the Democratic Party is far more antisemitic than the Republican Party.”

Not really. The linked article had no control group, and only examined one variable. There is no way to assess the validity of the results without additional information.

“As for religion being the sole cause of violence, I never heard that Ayers was very religious. Not to mention Mao, Stalin and Hitler.”

Again, the topic at hand is individual actors. If you want to talk about the causes and sources of large-scale political violence, that’s a different issue.

When it comes to lone gunman scenarios, the right has a near monopoly. I’m still waiting for an example of a left wing killer in the USA.

Peace.

DS

As for religion being the sole cause of violence, I never heard that Ayers was very religious. Not to mention Mao, Stalin and Hitler.

Kind of like the false faith of Socialism which has resulted in the deaths of over 100 million people. As a card carry socialist you really don’t want to go there.