http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMZbs6zu5PU&eurl=http://bloggers4ukip.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2008-12-20T17%3A01%3A00Z&max-results=13&feature=player_embedded

You actually believe scientists haven’t looked at the real world data? Wow.

Perhaps I’ve got you all wrong. But. Several years ago — when An Inconvenient Truth was being hyped by the press — I turned to my wife and said, guess what, honey: this is just the preamble, it’s not the real argument. In a few years, the advocates of anthropogenic global warming will have been debunked because their arguments do not rely on historical actual real data, but in fact future computer models created by ambitious but unfortunately biased humans, and they will turn instead towards other perceived, yet-to-occur crises in order to achieve what their bankrupt psychological predisposition demands. You see, ultimately they must satisfy their authoritarian bent, their desire to see a paternalistic state, their desire to control not just the behavior but the very thoughts of persons other than themselves to ensure what their own limited intellect suggests to them is correct human behavior… by manufacturing problems the solutions to which lie in a communal, socialist, hippie-freak governance that run contrary to not just liberty, but the reasonably limits on liberty that also make this country great (namely the rule of law). And lo and behold, the population argument has emerged, courtesy of your post. It was only a matter of time.

If you are interested in self correction, I recommend you join the voluntary human extinction movement. Look it up, it’s actually out there. If you think humans are bad, whether you are an environmentalist or simply catholic, well, take remedial action if you dare. There are many, many freaks who have elected to play on Team Earth (read: Team Inanimate Object) rather than Team Human (read: what every other living breathing thing does by evolutionary default, and I know you dig evolution, don’t you?). For goodness sake! The very real problems of limited natural resources, excessive population in a species that has achieved both a standard of living and technological achievement that should simply be marveled at — those problems are bad enough. But don’t co-opt these real things that must be prudently managed, and bastardize them into whatever b.s. cultish ultra-liberal anti-fellow-human warped-as-all-get-out pseudo-theology you have decided to replace religion with in the void of your mind. After all, ultimately, don’t you just want people driving a car exactly as big as yours, and no bigger? Don’t want to personally cut checks to the Sierra Club but instead wish that government forced everyone else to? What does that make you? A bitter human who willfully ignores the green-house impact of fricking water vapor in order to justify political ends that are as bankrupt as Lazar’s posts.

Or something like that.

You are insane.

How could you possibly think that the above would bolster your case for being a rational person who basis their opinion on evidence?

I only have one comment…the green house effect exists…the inconvenient truth that everyone steers clear of, is population growth and its effect on the planet. (from deforestation to increased CO2 emmissions and everything in between–waste of time to list).

No one wants to touch that variable for obvious political reasons…I suspect that variable’s value will self correct in short order