Sued by French TV: A Conversation with Philippe Karsenty
French media gadfly Philippe Karsenty discussed his ongoing lawsuit with France 2 in the Mohammed al Dura matter with Roger L. Simon during a visit to Los Angeles last week. Karsenty is urging French President Nicolas Sarkozy to require France 2 produce the entire disputed video, including missing outtakes, for full forensic investigation.
Why Pajamas Media Pays So Much Attention to Al Dura
Last week I had the pleasure of interviewing Philippe Karsenty when the French media gadfly was in Los Angeles.
More than any other English-language media outlet, Pajamas Media has been focusing on Karsenty’s Paris libel trials concerning the Al Dura matter. French state-owned television France 2 has sued Karsenty for accusing (on his site Media-Ratings) the network of broadcasting doctored news footage, which falsely stated Israeli troops killed the twelve-year old Palestinian boy Mohammed al Dura.
Why are we paying so much attention to this legal battle in France, which is based on a disputed event in Gaza over seven years ago (2000)? Well, certainly not to gain clicks or attention on the Internet, I regret to say.
We are following this because part of the mission of Pajamas Media is to examine the errors and omissions of mainstream media and try to understand why they occurred and to correct them. This began with the Dan Rather affair, which gave this company its name.
The Al Dura affair is arguably more important than Rather. The American anchorman lost his job for promulgating false documents about Bush’s National Guard service.
The France 2 news footage – shot by Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma and then produced and narrated by the French-Israeli anchorman Charles Enderlin – blames the Israeli army for child murder. What could be worse than that?
This Al Dura video, and the subsequent photo excised from it of the supposedly dead boy, has been called the “Mother of All Fauxtography.” And that could be so – at least for our time. (False photos, art and documents incriminating nations and ethnic groups are an ancient phenomenon.)
The phony photograph went round the world, inspiring Muslims everywhere to hatred of Israelis and Jews and helping to foment and justify the second Intifada. The photo appeared on postage stamps and on billboards throughout the Islamic world and Western Europe. Public squares and streets were named for the “martyred” boy. The murderers of Daniel Pearl claimed they were avenging young Mohammed’s death at the very moment they slit the American journalist’s throat.
When I was in Paris in 2004, I saw the fake photograph blown up on posters and displayed all over the Left Bank and at historic locations like the Luxembourg Gardens. No one thought to question it. The Israelis had killed the boy. It was as potent a piece of propaganda for our time as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was for an earlier epoch, perhaps more so, because it was virtually uncontested.
Pajamas Media will stay on this case until this calumny is corrected and France 2 publicly admits its errors. I would like to acknowledge the efforts of Richard Landes and PJM’s Paris editor Nidra Poller in this regard.
Some recent trial notes on the case by Professor Landes are here. A compendium of all Pajamas Media coverage is here.
 |
 |
 |
Podcasts |  PJM Home |
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
7 Comments
1. Noga:Whatever happened to the boy Al-Dura? I read somewhere that the Palestinian authorities refuse to allow his body to be exhumed. That means he is dead and buried. What did he die of? Does anybody know? If, at the end of the tape he is seen as still alive, at what point was he killed afterwards?
Dec 19, 2007 - 5:46 am 2. Annie Jacobsen:Incredibly important story, great interview.
Dec 19, 2007 - 7:02 am 3. mishu:I read somewhere that the Palestinian authorities refuse to allow his body to be exhumed. That means he is dead and buried.
Right now, all we know is that there is a grave site with his name on it. Whether he is dead and buried, remains another question.
Dec 19, 2007 - 7:19 am 4. willis:“Pajamas Media will stay on this case until this calumny is corrected and France 2 publicly admits its errors.”
These were not “errors.” They were wrongdoings. Otherwise France 2 would not try so desperately to prevent the truth becoming public.
Dec 19, 2007 - 10:28 am 5. Curly Smith:This Al Dura video …has been called the “Mother of All Fauxtography.”
It should be called the “Mother of All Known Fauxtography” because the best Fauxtography isn’t recognized as Fauxtography.
Did Dan Rather testify for the French Government as a “fake but accurate” Expert Witness?
Dec 19, 2007 - 2:52 pm 6. Silly Allah:It’s not too surprising. You have to understand the Western MSM naivet√© wrt
the Islam culture of dishonesty
Taqqiyah instructs Muslims to use misinformation as a means to an end. France 2 was caught with their pants down, looking stupid for being so naive. Now, they have become part of the problem by covering up the lie instead of coming clean. They are just as responsible as the original actors in causing the violence through the region with this lie.
Dec 19, 2007 - 9:20 pm 7. ranka:There was no autopsy performed, so there is no telling if the boy did die or not. Exhuming the body and running a DNA test would clinch that question.
Dec 20, 2007 - 6:04 amFrance 2 is not the only one to blame. The world media was sent a 3 min part of the raw footage, and chose, just like France 2, just to air the 59 sec that kicked off the second intifata.