Email This to a Friend
Sweetie, How Dare You Criticize Obama?
If John McCain had called a reporter "sweetie" he'd be castigated as a dirty old man hurling sexist remarks, but Obama got a free pass for "Sweetiegate." It's just one example of an ongoing double standard in Campaign 2008.
Calling your beloved “sweetie” is a term of endearment. A greasy guy draped in gold chains driving a red sports car calling a woman on the street “sweetie” is disrespectful and just creepy.Calling a reporter on the campaign trail “sweetie” could definitely be misogyny — as would be the first and only reaction of the left — but in Barack Obama’s case is more aptly filed under another sign of his disturbing pattern of arrogance.
Got that, cookie?
“Hold on one second, sweetie. We’ll do a press avail, thanks,” he said to reporter Peggy Agar of Detroit’s WXYZ-TV while touring a Chrysler plant last week. Agar had asked the senator what he’d do to help American autoworkers — you know, normal campaign-trail queries.
“I felt more offended that he didn’t answer the question,” Agar later said when asked if she was offended by Obama calling her “sweetie.”
Obama left a message on her answering machine saying he was “duly chastened” and giving the excuse that it’s “a bad habit of mine. I do it sometimes with all kinds of people.”
The stamp of forgiveness from Whoopi Goldberg and other talking heads was swift. If John McCain had called a reporter “sweetie,” though, he’d be castigated as a dirty old man hurling sexist remarks. The earlier allegations of indiscretion with the female lobbyist would be resurrected, and Cindy McCain would be sentenced to another arduous term on “The View” as the co-hosts assailed the senator for disrespecting a woman so. Mac’s penance would be long and painful.
By all accounts, Obama is liberal with “sweetie” on the campaign trail, yet usually in the context of interacting with his loyal flock. Though journalists get called a lot worse, it’s not exactly appropriate for a candidate to bark the word at a reporter.
But it’s just a “bad habit” of his. Remember that, all you honeybunnies and cupcakes! Absolve the anointed one!
To properly assess Sweetiegate, you have to go back and fill in the blanks. Obama was not addressing Agar with any measure of affection; rather, he was annoyed that she was interrupting his grandstanding with a question and thus waved her off.
ABC News highlighted an earlier use of “sweetie” by Obama on the campaign trail, telling a woman, “Sweetie, if I start with a picture I will never get out of here,” and “Sweetie, if I start doing autographs I just won’t be -… I am really late.”
Sweetie, don’t you know what a star I am? Don’t you know I can’t be bothered, honeykins?
To see how this fits with Obama’s pattern of arrogance, we need only look at another news story last week when Bush made some important remarks to the Knesset:
“There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness in these men (like Hamas, bin Laden and Ahmadinejad) and try to explain away their words. It’s natural, but it is deadly wrong. As witnesses to evil in the past, we carry a solemn responsibility to take these words seriously. Jews and Americans have seen the consequences of disregarding the words of leaders who espouse hatred. And that is a mistake the world must not repeat in the 21st century.
“Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
Why, of course he must be just trying to deviously slam the anointed one! Never mind that Bush was speaking to an assembly that included Holocaust survivors and children of survivors. Obama jumped on Bush for soiling Israel’s 60th anniversary with a “false political attack” and engaging in “the politics of fear” with an “appalling attack.”
When the president never even said your name, thou doth protest too much, Obama.
Aghast! John McCain’s campaign also recently pointed out that Hamas endorsed Obama’s candidacy. Surely it’s lowest-blow smear at the divine candidate himself!
Ahmed Yousef, chief political adviser to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, did say in an interview, “We like Mr. Obama. We hope he will win the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance.” What is wrong with stepping back and asking ourselves why a terrorist organization thinks he’s the cat’s meow?
The signs go on and on. How dare that Hillary continue to impede his rise to political superstardom! And showing that the arrogance is a team effort, consider Michelle Obama not being proud of her country until they duly rallied around her husband.
Arrogance continued in what was hailed as Obama’s landmark speech on race in America. It was nothing of the sort: It was a man who, when called to answer for his own lengthy relationship with an anti-American and bigoted pastor, turned the subject around to Racist White Granny, promptly throwing his grandmother under the bus to spin the conversation away from his own actions (or lack of, as the case was).
Oh, the audacity of the pundits for questioning his Rev. Wright chumminess!
The best presidents are characterized by humility, not by a sense of self-importance, grandiloquent speeches or rock-star status. Think Abraham Lincoln, who couldn’t imagine why he’d been picked as president and didn’t proceed with his duties as if it was a popularity contest. Our greatest president was humble, reserved, committed, and freed the slaves.
Obama’s arrogance alone is cause for concern in foreign relations, but this pervasive taking offense at what is perceived to be the slightest questioning of his qualifications and foreign-policy naivete is what could really cause a slip at such a sensitive juncture in history.
Talking with Iran? How dare anyone question it! Incursion into Pakistan? How dare you point out his ignorance of the delicate political balance there! Naming the president of Russia? Thank God Hillary’s still around to piggyback one’s answers on.
And that’s before he lets loose and calls Angela Merkel “dollface.”
Bridget Johnson (www.bridgetjohnson.org) is a columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News.
 |
 |
 |
Podcasts |  PJM Home |
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
54 Comments
1. jvon:I’m willing to forgive Obama for this, if we can all admit that Mel Gibson calling a female cop “Sugartits” was hilarious.
May 18, 2008 - 1:31 am 2. zhombre:I’m willing to accept the equivalence with Gibson, if you really want to compare Obama to an anti-Semitic boor with a drinking problem and a huge ego.
May 18, 2008 - 4:29 am 3. SAF:The press has always favored the Democrats, its just more blatant with Senator Obama. What I find amusing is that Senator Clinton, who always was the beneficiary of such bias is now the victim and decries this bias. Perhaps she didn’t know it existed, although I find that hard to believe. Though many on the left think the press is fair.
The press has taken it upon themselves to make sure Senator Obama is anointed president.
May 18, 2008 - 5:08 am 4. John Samford:“Calling your beloved “sweetie” is a term of endearment.”
Maybe in your ‘hood. In my neck of the woods, ’sweetie’ is a generic word for female. It has no emotional connotation whatsoever. “Sugar” is a term of endearment as well as “honey”.
May 18, 2008 - 5:18 am 5. Reynolds Butler:I first ran across that back in the early 70’s. One of my college buds dropped by on his way to Texas for a visit. I took him down to Momma’s for some world famous Bar-B-Que. The little girl brought our lunch over and asked him, “Sugar, you want a try?” His eys got big and he said “Try what?”. I had to calm him down and explain that try was southern for tray. Thought I was gonna have to throw cold water on him for a while. He had heard how friendly southern girls were and she was cuter then a bug’s ear.
Um, jvon, newsflash: Gibson isn’t running for President.
May 18, 2008 - 5:20 am 6. WR Jonas:I watch a minister on Sunday mornings (Jim Tolle) who uses the phrase “sweetheart” like a California car salesman. He does it with a broad grin and a hint of mischief and it is slyly effective.
May 18, 2008 - 5:40 am 7. Noga:When Obama does it, it has that condescending ring to it that tells you he thinks you’re inferior.
It all depends on what is in ones heart.
“ABC News highlighted an earlier use of “sweetie” by Obama on the campaign trail, telling a woman, “Sweetie, if I start with a picture I will never get out of here,” and “Sweetie, if I start doing autographs I just won’t be -… I am really late.”
It may not be arrogance, per se, but a short temper, an irritability, on some occasions when he is too tired with questions which interrupt his concentration. As in this example:
” Democratic White House contender Barack Obama could not hide his irritation Monday when asked by a reporter what he thought about former president Jimmy Carter’s meeting with Hamas last week.
“Why can’t I just eat my waffle?” the Illinois senator said as he ate breakfast in Scranton, Pennsylvania, according to MSNBC television pictures.
Pressed again for an answer, he replied: “Just let me eat my waffle.”
http://krishna109.newsvine.com/_news/2008/04/23/1448692-obama-waffles
To me it suggests a certain lack of self-awareness. It is remediable with experience, no doubt, but does point again to the simple fact that Obama is very green in politics and lacks the necessary experience. Irritability or arrogance in and off themselves are not a sin in a leader. They can be dealt with. But the lack of experience is something that time can cure, but not in a president who will be leader of the free world almost as soon as he is elected. He or she should come fully prepared to his position. Learning while already a president may demand too harsh a price from all sors of people and countries.
May 18, 2008 - 5:42 am 8. eskotek:“Sugar, you want a try?” His eys got big and he said “Try what?”/i>
Okay that was funny.
May 18, 2008 - 7:24 am 9. eskotek:Ooops
May 18, 2008 - 7:25 am 10. Charlie (Colorado):I’m willing to accept the equivalence with Gibson, if you really want to compare Obama to an anti-Semitic boor with a drinking problem and a huge ego.
Yeah, I’m good with that.
May 18, 2008 - 7:27 am 11. mjk:But Noga, Obama doesn’t need experience. He’s got HOPE! and CHANGE! (tm Obama campaign). And he can call people Sweetie because that way he doesn’t actually need to answer hard questions or explain why he would meet with Iran’s thug leadership.
May 18, 2008 - 7:42 am 12. Linkage « The Reluctant Optimist:[...] 3. Sweetie – A Case of Arrogance. [...]
May 18, 2008 - 7:45 am 13. John:Being southern born and reared, I was amused to hear of a Chicago Yankee using the term “Sweetie” as a form of address to a profession woman. All true southern men use this term, and others, as endearments to females they are fond of, especially wives, girl friends, daughters, and grand children. Lest we forget, “babycakes”, “honeybunnie”, “dahlin’”, “sugar”, and “sweetcheeks” are all also commonly names used for that same set of cherished females. However, we don’t normally address our professional colleagues and co-workers with these terms of familiarity, no matter how much she may irritate us.
Obama’s use of the term in this instance was unthinkingly sexist, and arrogantly condescending; he deserves to be fried in the same skillet as any other public figure that makes such a gaff.
Of course this is just my opinion, your mileage may vary.
May 18, 2008 - 7:57 am 14. AJ:They’ve been in the tank for Obama since Day One. Chris Matthews, Olbermann and the leftists at MSNBC are the worst…
May 18, 2008 - 8:03 am 15. Ken:The point is not that he used the term “sweetie”. The point is how the press doesn’t really give a damn what he does or says. He has made a lot of ignorant remarks, if said by a President could have significant international impact. But he doesn’t have to defend his actions or the words he uses- the press does it for him. And when the opposition speaks about his lacking, the press again defends him and skewers the opposition’s point of view. What a team!
May 18, 2008 - 8:05 am 16. Bryan:Your first sentence captures why the fogiveness has been swift. Considering the orgasmic swooning we keep being told is the female reaction to Obama (esp. among press corps members; the “ogling” u-tube video comes to mind), is it any wonder there was an assumption this was a ‘tear of endearment from one’s beloved?” Heh.
May 18, 2008 - 8:07 am 17. Letalis Maximus, Esq.:Obama’s mama may have been from Kansas, but this guy has got self-appointed aristocracy written all over him.
May 18, 2008 - 8:38 am 18. Bill Perron:Mel Gibson has made some really great entertaining movies. It is racist and bogoted to pick on Mel Gibson. … Obama
May 18, 2008 - 8:41 am 19. Cindy Sue Causey:In my neck of the woods, “sweetie” is used as a derogatory put-down, in particular in instances such as appear described here.. It is something akin to replacing the “b” word with “sweetie” in the same way “heck” is used in place of.. h-e-double-toothpicks…….
My guess is that one who is applying for the job of president has studied up on how not to offend those of foreign countries.. What exactly has become so difficile about doing the same within ours..?
Politically correct verbiage is part and parcel of the presidential job employment package..
Period.
Cyber hugs from Talking Rock..
May 18, 2008 - 8:58 am 20. rotwang:Obama is attractive, charming and genial, which makes it hard to view these informal endearments as chauvinist repression. McCain, on the other hand, is a creepy old gigolo on whose lips the word “Sweetie” would be enough to gag a porn-star.
PS: I think Angela Merkel would prefer being called “dollface” by Obama to enduring the vigorous Presidential Public Grope she received at the hands of George Bush.
May 18, 2008 - 9:00 am 21. mishu:Chicago Yankee
In Chicago, there are Cubs and there are White Sox but are absolutely no Yankees.
May 18, 2008 - 9:11 am 22. Robbins Mitchell:I would be willing to overlook Obama’s use of the term ‘Sweetie’ if he would just once refer to Rodham as ‘Stinky’
May 18, 2008 - 9:24 am 23. Regular Gug:I work for the Federal government in Washington. If I called any of my female colleagues “Sweetie,” I would be romptly disciplined and could forget about any promotion to a managerial position for a long time. Why doesn’t my future boss get held to the same standard?
May 18, 2008 - 9:31 am 24. Jay Guevara:She didn’t use the obvious response: “Thank you, boy.”
It’s just a bad habit of hers, she does it all the time with all kinds of people…
May 18, 2008 - 9:48 am 25. Abraxas:“I’m willing to accept the equivalence with Gibson, if you really want to compare Obama to an anti-Semitic boor with a drinking problem and a huge ego.”
Please leave Ted Kennedy out of this.
May 18, 2008 - 10:22 am 26. Big S:“But it’s just a “bad habit” of his. Remember that, all you honeybunnies and cupcakes! Absolve the anointed one!”
I’m glad he claimed that it’s a bad habit of his. If he had not, we would have inevitably heard that calling women “sweetie” is completely repectable in the African-American community, and that people just don’t understand it, or some such nonsense.
May 18, 2008 - 10:52 am 27. Accounting Bum » Blog Archive » State of the Race:[...] slowly from young and naive to deeply cynical and arrogant. See Rev. Wright, Rezko, Ayers, and sweetie incident) He holds out to the country the promise of racial healing. Unfortunately he is also the most [...]
May 18, 2008 - 11:04 am 28. Mikey NTH:There is a word he could use, “Miss”; it isn’t disrespectful. Or he could try “Ma’am”, neither is hard to learn.
May 18, 2008 - 11:22 am 29. Mockinbird:Yeah, he could have said “Ma’am”. Perhaps it was too middle classed.
May 18, 2008 - 11:44 am 30. Paul M Hupf:Barack Obama, all too often, has complained of a personal attack on him, when in fact the remarks in question, as in the case of President Bush’s remarks in Israel, were of significance far beyond the issues of Obama’s campaign for the White House. He “protests too much”.
May 18, 2008 - 1:44 pm 31. indga:Being of Caribbean stock, I tend to use ‘boy’ a lot. To people I know. Even when I’m in a hot and heavy debate, cultural habits sneak through in the heat of the moment. Black American males don’t like it when I call them ‘boy.’ So far, no white males have objected. It’s not that I don’t know the person’s name, it’s that I feel comfortable enough with someone I know. Younger men I call ‘babe,’ ’sugar’, especially when they’re about the same age as my nephew.
Obama neither knew the reporter, nor was comfortable with her, nor is he old enough to have enough distance so that ’sweetie’ is perceived to be avuncular. I’m inclined to think that perhaps Obama uses ’sweetie’ as a way of obfuscating the fact that he doesn’t know the names of a lot of the women with whom he interacts. Worse yet for him is his inability to distinguish the propriety of the term’s usage. That tells me he’s indifferent: he doesn’t care to know the women’s names, and he thinks he’s charming and cute enough that women will give him a pass. After all, it’s BARRY Obama who’s calling ‘em ’sweetie,’ doncherknow!
May 18, 2008 - 2:22 pm 32. Chester White:It reminds me of how if a southern woman says about another, “Bless her heart,” it really means, “That g.d. f b!tch.”
You gotta know the code.
You comment about Lincoln is a bit off. Lincoln was a supremely ambitious man who worked for many years toward being President. He knew exactly what he was doing and didn’t exhibit any such humility in anything of his I have ever read.
May 18, 2008 - 2:44 pm 33. Jim M:One of the great rituals of the American left media is to project on to the proclaimed one all of their desires hopes and dreams. (The drizzle is running down my leg ala Chris Matthews) Any sense of reality and non bias is thrown out. Then the covers come off the eyes of them media when the proclaimed one fails them and shows that he is another phony politician. So let’s start the pool for the holy one St Obama. Will the press catch up to him in January, February or March of next year. And do we have suffer “Monicaitis and Jimmy Swigart while the Saint debates with himself on if he should proclaim he has sinned and ask for our forgiveness. Then the stupid cycle starts all over again. Thank god we don’t have to endure this nonsense with the GOP pols. They are designated evil by the media and nothing will change it in their minds.
May 18, 2008 - 5:00 pm 34. David P:the problem with middle eastern studies programs in academia is that they are always searching for funding. years ago the oil sultans of the middle east discovered that if they bank role these programs at major universities they can influence what is taught and who teaches it. Obama and his advisers are products of this phenomenon and intend to impose these outlandish policy ideas when and if elected to office. global oil barons saw an opening and exposed it. if they can educate the upper class, the elite, the wealthy, when they are most impressionable and vulnerable they can quietly push forward an ideology that panders to those who will lead the country in the future. this is a result of their longitudinal and calculated approach.
May 18, 2008 - 6:17 pm 35. Misanthropicus:Jay Guevara: “[...] She didn’t use the obvious response: ‘Thank you, boy.’
It’s just a bad habit of hers, she does it all the time with all kinds of people. [...]”
Bingo, Jay.
May 18, 2008 - 6:24 pm 36. Misanthropicus:Also, LA Times finds entirely acceptable the term of “leggy Ann Coulter” – or variations thereof.
May 18, 2008 - 6:48 pm 37. Chris:And since here, do you remember the “niggardly” scandal a few years ago?
And since here, did you notice that the term “faggot” (wind instrument) has been completely replaced in the past years by “bassoon”?
And since here, did you notice that Hildegard von Bingen has been quietly promoted from (European) medieval nun/abbess-musician to the rank of mystical feminist, or a… Ellen Degeneres?
And since here, do you remember that Orwell’s 1984 has an end chapter dealing with “language control”?
And since here, did you notice that Orwell isn’t cool anymore, actually he’s a traitor of the cause? (Like John Dos Passos)
And since here… and since here… and since there is too much for this format to speak about the greed for power/hypocrisy of the left, let’s close with…. since here, what about… a creeping coup?
I’m originally from Pittsburgh. Ever since I can remember, waitresses in Pittsburgh have called me some variation of “honey.” They did it when I was 4 and they do it now that I am on the far side of 40. Mostly older ones, but younger ones sometimes do it too.
I don’t mind a bit, it seems the female equivalent of avuncular. (I looked it up, there is no exact female equivalent.)
Perhaps people should relax a bit, rather than screaming misogyny at the drop of a hat.
May 18, 2008 - 7:31 pm 38. Porgie:True, we should relax, especially when Bush mangles a word or two during a speech. But that hasn’t happened for eight years as every verbal misstep by the man earns him the label “moron” from dismissive lefties, so why start now?
May 18, 2008 - 8:49 pm 39. John:mishu:
<>
mishu, where I come from,,, anyone who resides even slightly north of Dallas is considered to be a yankee. Heck, I was 14 years old before I learned “damnyankee” was supposed to be two words. To be revealed as an elitist yankee should be the equivalent of a political kiss of death in the South. Obama has earned those stripes, he will, I’m sure, wear them with pride all the way to defeat at the hands of John McCain in November.
May 19, 2008 - 4:34 am 40. Political Mavens » Bridget the Editorial Sadomasochist:[...] and spoke with the reporter while still in PJs (which lends immense credence to my weekly gig at Pajamas Media) and fuzzy socks, bleary eyed and wondering how much Diet Coke it would take to arrive at a [...]
May 19, 2008 - 5:12 am 41. submandave:The Senator’s use of “sweetie” was, to me, obviously dismissive. Like the other examples given it is short for “don’t bother me, just listen.” As to if if it sexist or not, I would say that depends upon if one can find similarly dismissive language directed at males.
But sexist ot not, arrogant or not, it is, for me, far too casual a form of address to be used by one who aspires to be arguably the most powerful person on Earth. Of course, I don’t like it when salesmen I’ve never met cold-call me using my first name, either.
May 19, 2008 - 6:04 am 42. Dave:“Sweetie…”
Hmmmm…is that “typical half-white, half-black behavior”???
Maybe he was just called that by his grandma when he was little!
May 19, 2008 - 11:29 am 43. Dani:I think John nailed it when he said that even in the South, where diminutive terms of endearment are common, they’re never used to address a colleague or co-worker. What’s okay for a waitress in Philly is not okay for an Ivy-league educated Northern politician. He knows better- it’s dismissive, arrogant and condescending. I usually just reverse the roles and see if it seems inappropriate- if it does, then it’s wrong. Imagine the reporter saying, “Sweetie, could you just answer one more question?”
I did get a kick out of the pure derision dripping from the reporter’s voice when she used the word, though. Wonder if that group of reporters swooning over a jeans-wearing BO last week would have quite the same reaction after seeing this video.
May 19, 2008 - 1:06 pm 44. Believer:Bush sure “caught it” for that wink of his.
I remember thinking it a bit odd – but it was accompanied by a shrug of his shoulders and a goofy smile/laugh. He seemed almost vulnerable, perhaps a (justifiable) nervousness as he faced the press.
It carried with it none of the dismissiveness that Obama’s remark has. No one felt belittled.
Still, the MSM won’t make much, if anything, of this. And perhaps we shouldn’t either – except to note the bias continues.
May 19, 2008 - 2:21 pm 45. George:I just hope if Obama keeps being so hyper-defensive about every critique, McCain starts addressing him as ’sweetie’ occasionally… I get the feeling of cold feet from the Democratic party on this guy, seemed like a good idea when it started as someone to stimulate Hillary into a strong campaign, until the delegates quickly added up. All you hear from him is the ubiquitous ‘change’ explination of everything and when his widdle feelings get hurt.
May 19, 2008 - 3:29 pm 46. Chris:So, we’re all agreed then?
Overreactions to imagined slights has been approved.
Personally, I am offended. (Hon.)
May 19, 2008 - 7:14 pm 47. uuwe:Amazing that people are willing to accept such decline in culture.It is sad enough that we have to deal whit this on the streets and media but now we are lowering our self to accept this kind of language from our Commander and Chief.
Is thats what the youth is looking.
And for al the women how accept this kind of language SHAME ON YOU!
May 20, 2008 - 11:29 am 48. Javelin:Can you get any more petty and predictable? I mean, who really cares about such trivia. And this arrogant collection of third rate commentary is sending whom down the river?
May 20, 2008 - 12:38 pm 49. Misanthropicus:RE Javelin: “Can you get any more petty and predictable? I mean, who really cares about such trivia. And this arrogant collection of third rate commentary [sic!] is sending whom down the river?”
Yo, blunt Javelin – if you and the larger liberal herd are that noble and openminded and find no reason for comments on Obama’s use of ’sweetie’ term, why do you scream when someone uses his name of “Hussein”?
May 20, 2008 - 2:28 pm 50. Ed Wallis:As far as this “collection of third rate commentaRIES (!!!) – a liberal cultural relativist like you should know that values are how they appear in the eyes of the beholders.
Looks to me that a pencil sharpener is the right fit for sharpening your enormous mental abilities, Javelin.
…an absolutely lovely observation…
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/barry_honey_can_we_talk.html
May 21, 2008 - 3:02 am 51. Believer:Ed Wallis’ link to American Thinker is a must read.
May 21, 2008 - 12:15 pm 52. Will Becker:The man is an arrogant a**.
May 21, 2008 - 1:30 pm 53. d moran case worker butler pa:[...] isn’t running for President. … Constitution Is Big Winner in D.C. Gun Case. by Dave Kopel …http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/sweetiegate-a-case-of-obama-arrogance/NEW CASE = FATAL = STATE EMPLOYEEillinois workers&apos compensation commission page … on [...]
Jul 2, 2008 - 6:48 pm 54. history of slips:[...] of his qualifications and foreign-policy naivete is what could really cause a slip at such a sensithttp://pajamasmedia.com/blog/sweetiegate-a-case-of-obama-arrogance/History Of Slips And Other Things. – Fashion-era ForumMay 16, 2008 … Hello, I wore slips just [...]
Jul 9, 2008 - 11:23 am