<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Reasons for Conservatives to Be Thankful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:03:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-2/#comment-165931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-165931</guid>
		<description>You say the Reps went 7 years without a major terriorist attack on our soil. Yeah, but the first one was on the Reps watch. Does that count?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say the Reps went 7 years without a major terriorist attack on our soil. Yeah, but the first one was on the Reps watch. Does that count?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-2/#comment-163809</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-163809</guid>
		<description>You forgot reason #11: Ted Stevens, the man who did more to give the GOP a bad name than anyone other than George W. Bush, is about to check out of Congress and into the Gray Bar Hotel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot reason #11: Ted Stevens, the man who did more to give the GOP a bad name than anyone other than George W. Bush, is about to check out of Congress and into the Gray Bar Hotel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Historian</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-2/#comment-163299</link>
		<dc:creator>The Historian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-163299</guid>
		<description>BIG MEDIA NOW DEAD ON ARRIVAL
Big electronic and print media has committed suicide by bias.  As noted at this link, the old king is dead:

http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/12/web-authentic-news-opinion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIG MEDIA NOW DEAD ON ARRIVAL<br />
Big electronic and print media has committed suicide by bias.  As noted at this link, the old king is dead:</p>
<p><a href="http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/12/web-authentic-news-opinion.html" rel="nofollow">http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/12/web-authentic-news-opinion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-2/#comment-163258</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-163258</guid>
		<description>Please stop suggesting that there is anything positive about Eric Cantor. He has been in the House GOP leadership since 2002. Thus he is partly responsible for all of our legislative debacles since then -- namely the betrayal of conservative values and the promotion of the largest entitlement expansion in 40 years.

And articulate? When asked if we should use nuclear weapons against Iran, he said it should be left up to the commanders on the ground. When explaining why the GOP voted against the bailout package that he backed, he blamed it on Nancy Pelosi&#039;s speech. Horrible as her speech was, using it as a scapegoat for his inability to do his job was blazen cowardice. This guy can&#039;t say anything that isn&#039;t a talking-point programmed into his head.

He cannot begin to compete with the REAL future of the GOP: Palin, Jindal, Ryan, and Steele.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop suggesting that there is anything positive about Eric Cantor. He has been in the House GOP leadership since 2002. Thus he is partly responsible for all of our legislative debacles since then &#8212; namely the betrayal of conservative values and the promotion of the largest entitlement expansion in 40 years.</p>
<p>And articulate? When asked if we should use nuclear weapons against Iran, he said it should be left up to the commanders on the ground. When explaining why the GOP voted against the bailout package that he backed, he blamed it on Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s speech. Horrible as her speech was, using it as a scapegoat for his inability to do his job was blazen cowardice. This guy can&#8217;t say anything that isn&#8217;t a talking-point programmed into his head.</p>
<p>He cannot begin to compete with the REAL future of the GOP: Palin, Jindal, Ryan, and Steele.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Westlake</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-2/#comment-162057</link>
		<dc:creator>James Westlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-162057</guid>
		<description>this is Good...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/world_news_america/7749748.stm

and it will really annoy the right wing nut jobs here.

westlake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is Good&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/world_news_america/7749748.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/world_news_america/7749748.stm</a></p>
<p>and it will really annoy the right wing nut jobs here.</p>
<p>westlake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Alston</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-161630</link>
		<dc:creator>G Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-161630</guid>
		<description>AJ -- &quot;YOUR candidate was the most liberal senator in America and your party is run by George Soros and the far left. Who does that appeal to?&quot;

I&#039;d say about 54% of the voting public.

Is this difficult? Bueller? Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ &#8212; &#8220;YOUR candidate was the most liberal senator in America and your party is run by George Soros and the far left. Who does that appeal to?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say about 54% of the voting public.</p>
<p>Is this difficult? Bueller? Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-161617</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-161617</guid>
		<description>I agree on all counts. In fact, from assessments over the past week in WSJ, there appears to be reason for considerable optimism: Obama seems to be abandoning many left-leaning positions and promises, thanks, perhaps, to his own raw native intelligence or the &quot;intelligence&quot; now available to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on all counts. In fact, from assessments over the past week in WSJ, there appears to be reason for considerable optimism: Obama seems to be abandoning many left-leaning positions and promises, thanks, perhaps, to his own raw native intelligence or the &#8220;intelligence&#8221; now available to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-161608</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-161608</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your party lost, and will continue to lose, until you can appeal to a broader base, with new ideas. That means people other than, the rich, the white, and the angry.&quot;

Clyde, I have read comments here for nearly four years and this may be the most INANE comment yet.

YOUR candidate was the most liberal senator in America and your party is run by George Soros and the far left. Who does that appeal to? The enemies of America and brainwashed people who wrongly hate the president who kept them safe for 7 years?

New ideas? What are the Dems &quot;new ideas&quot;? Lose the war, bash the troops and religious folks, while appealing to the blacks, the homeless and the collegians? 

And in terms of anger, go to any left leaning city and feel the anger from the rich and privileged.

Clyde, you sir, are a breathtakingly misguided fool.

I&#039;ll pray for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your party lost, and will continue to lose, until you can appeal to a broader base, with new ideas. That means people other than, the rich, the white, and the angry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clyde, I have read comments here for nearly four years and this may be the most INANE comment yet.</p>
<p>YOUR candidate was the most liberal senator in America and your party is run by George Soros and the far left. Who does that appeal to? The enemies of America and brainwashed people who wrongly hate the president who kept them safe for 7 years?</p>
<p>New ideas? What are the Dems &#8220;new ideas&#8221;? Lose the war, bash the troops and religious folks, while appealing to the blacks, the homeless and the collegians? </p>
<p>And in terms of anger, go to any left leaning city and feel the anger from the rich and privileged.</p>
<p>Clyde, you sir, are a breathtakingly misguided fool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll pray for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Weimer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-161591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Weimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-161591</guid>
		<description>Mandy, try bringing a real argument. Name calling and smugness just don&#039;t quite measure up.

BobD

1) The important part is that there hasn&#039;t been any since 9/11, get it? the plan to do it was hatched, planned, and partially executed (flight schools, etc.) before he was even elected, so to imply he&#039;s at fault due to accident of timing is disingenuous. There were plenty of isolated warnings of SOMETHING, but the &quot;wall&quot; put up, incidentally, by Jamie Gorelick, kept the data from being properly put together until it was too late. 

2) How we dealt with the first WTC bombing (and subsequent police/legal reactions to Khobar, USS Cole, African Embassies, et al) RESULTED in 9/11. It showed to them we didn&#039;t have the stomach to even try to deal with what they were, terrorists. We myopically satisfied ourselves by treating them as common criminals, and they were emboldened. 

3) As Rubin said, we can debate entering into Iraq in the first place, I have my doubts. BUT, once we did it, we had to see it through or our &quot;standing&quot; in the international community would have been even worse. IF we would have left without victory, there would have been further proof we are a country who doesn&#039;t keep it&#039;s promises - just like after Vietnam. And the jihadist terrorists would have even more proof we&#039;re a paper tiger that can be brought down with a thousand little cuts. As for the scenario you cite, it may very well still end up that way, but with this new SOFA, we&#039;ll still have a presence there for the next three years, and a renegotiation may allow us there for a long time after that - and that will give Iran pause no matter what. Ultimately, we will have to let Iraq be Iraq and hope for the best. However, leaving early would have almost certainly resulted in that scenario and possibly left the country open for a full scale invasion by Iran. Bin Laden is only the most notorious - we should be more than happy, if not truly satisfied, with nearly ruining his organization to the point of ineffectiveness as it stands now. 

Supporting the President was a bipartisan affair. He couldn&#039;t have done it without support of people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Counterpoint - how many on the left are cheering Obama&#039;s cabinet picks, even though they are not &quot;progressive&quot; just because he picked them? Even further back, how many followed Bill Clinton into Kosovo, nee helped justify it, even though it had (and has - we&#039;re still sending troops there) less national interest than Iraq. Fun fact - we came into Kosovo on the side of the Muslims and that got us where with the muslim world, exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mandy, try bringing a real argument. Name calling and smugness just don&#8217;t quite measure up.</p>
<p>BobD</p>
<p>1) The important part is that there hasn&#8217;t been any since 9/11, get it? the plan to do it was hatched, planned, and partially executed (flight schools, etc.) before he was even elected, so to imply he&#8217;s at fault due to accident of timing is disingenuous. There were plenty of isolated warnings of SOMETHING, but the &#8220;wall&#8221; put up, incidentally, by Jamie Gorelick, kept the data from being properly put together until it was too late. </p>
<p>2) How we dealt with the first WTC bombing (and subsequent police/legal reactions to Khobar, USS Cole, African Embassies, et al) RESULTED in 9/11. It showed to them we didn&#8217;t have the stomach to even try to deal with what they were, terrorists. We myopically satisfied ourselves by treating them as common criminals, and they were emboldened. </p>
<p>3) As Rubin said, we can debate entering into Iraq in the first place, I have my doubts. BUT, once we did it, we had to see it through or our &#8220;standing&#8221; in the international community would have been even worse. IF we would have left without victory, there would have been further proof we are a country who doesn&#8217;t keep it&#8217;s promises &#8211; just like after Vietnam. And the jihadist terrorists would have even more proof we&#8217;re a paper tiger that can be brought down with a thousand little cuts. As for the scenario you cite, it may very well still end up that way, but with this new SOFA, we&#8217;ll still have a presence there for the next three years, and a renegotiation may allow us there for a long time after that &#8211; and that will give Iran pause no matter what. Ultimately, we will have to let Iraq be Iraq and hope for the best. However, leaving early would have almost certainly resulted in that scenario and possibly left the country open for a full scale invasion by Iran. Bin Laden is only the most notorious &#8211; we should be more than happy, if not truly satisfied, with nearly ruining his organization to the point of ineffectiveness as it stands now. </p>
<p>Supporting the President was a bipartisan affair. He couldn&#8217;t have done it without support of people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Counterpoint &#8211; how many on the left are cheering Obama&#8217;s cabinet picks, even though they are not &#8220;progressive&#8221; just because he picked them? Even further back, how many followed Bill Clinton into Kosovo, nee helped justify it, even though it had (and has &#8211; we&#8217;re still sending troops there) less national interest than Iraq. Fun fact &#8211; we came into Kosovo on the side of the Muslims and that got us where with the muslim world, exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roark</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ten-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-161575</link>
		<dc:creator>Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=40139#comment-161575</guid>
		<description>Ten Reasons for Conservatives to Be Thankful:

1)Justice Clarence Thomas 
2)Jeff Flake R-AZ
3)Rush Limbaugh
4)DeMint R-SC
5)Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights
6)Pajamas Media
7)National Taxpayers Union
8)Michael Savage
9)Rudy Giuliani
10)YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten Reasons for Conservatives to Be Thankful:</p>
<p>1)Justice Clarence Thomas<br />
2)Jeff Flake R-AZ<br />
3)Rush Limbaugh<br />
4)DeMint R-SC<br />
5)Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights<br />
6)Pajamas Media<br />
7)National Taxpayers Union<br />
8)Michael Savage<br />
9)Rudy Giuliani<br />
10)YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
