<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Gun Rant in the Daily Beast Ignores the Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:26:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Pheet</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-367589</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Pheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-367589</guid>
		<description>Everyone, shut up. Idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone, shut up. Idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurwing Plover</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-338235</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurwing Plover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-338235</guid>
		<description>Gun control is the biggist fruad around i mean absolutly nothing but lies and the NEW YORK SLIMES is spreading these lies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun control is the biggist fruad around i mean absolutly nothing but lies and the NEW YORK SLIMES is spreading these lies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul -Indiana</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-242168</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul -Indiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-242168</guid>
		<description>#18  According to nationmaster.com, the US is the 24th most violent country in the world with a murder rate of 0.042802 per 1,000 people. The UK comes in at 45 with a murder rate of 0.0140633 per 1,000 people.

===============

If making guns illegal really worked, then the UK&#039;s rate would be at zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18  According to nationmaster.com, the US is the 24th most violent country in the world with a murder rate of 0.042802 per 1,000 people. The UK comes in at 45 with a murder rate of 0.0140633 per 1,000 people.</p>
<p>===============</p>
<p>If making guns illegal really worked, then the UK&#8217;s rate would be at zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockmelon</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-241639</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockmelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-241639</guid>
		<description>This may have been an argument in years past, but not today.  Not when there are over 35 terrorist camps on American soil.  Not when 80% of the mosques in the US are preaching hate and planning the takeover of America. Take away our guns?  Over my dead body! 

This is one battle that we cannot afford to lose and if it takes a revolution, I say count me in! We ALL have ancestors who lost their lives while protecting the US from outside threats.  Let&#039;s not let them down now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may have been an argument in years past, but not today.  Not when there are over 35 terrorist camps on American soil.  Not when 80% of the mosques in the US are preaching hate and planning the takeover of America. Take away our guns?  Over my dead body! </p>
<p>This is one battle that we cannot afford to lose and if it takes a revolution, I say count me in! We ALL have ancestors who lost their lives while protecting the US from outside threats.  Let&#8217;s not let them down now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tertium Quid</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-241126</link>
		<dc:creator>Tertium Quid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-241126</guid>
		<description>The English armed the peasants with long bows in order to defeat the French during the Hundred Years War.  Armed commoners could defeat armored knights.  Of course, the commoners earned some liberty for their troubles over the centuries.  The king and aristocrats did not cede power because they were magnanimous and enlightened. Those who fight for their rulers demand more liberty.  Thus, the individual possession of weapons and the limitation of state power often goes hand-in-hand.  The English should know this better than anyone.

In America, the government has never been competent to protect a violent people from violence, so your best protection is your own firearm.  I live a quarter-mile from the police station, but I am more confident in the deterrent factor of private firearms than in the police to protect me and my family.

Finally, in America, smuggling is the second oldest profession.  If you want it, you can get it, so don&#039;t think the government could outlaw private firearms any better than it has outlawed marijuana, cocaine, or exotic pets.

In the end, firearms and an armed citizenry will outlive the regulatory state here in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English armed the peasants with long bows in order to defeat the French during the Hundred Years War.  Armed commoners could defeat armored knights.  Of course, the commoners earned some liberty for their troubles over the centuries.  The king and aristocrats did not cede power because they were magnanimous and enlightened. Those who fight for their rulers demand more liberty.  Thus, the individual possession of weapons and the limitation of state power often goes hand-in-hand.  The English should know this better than anyone.</p>
<p>In America, the government has never been competent to protect a violent people from violence, so your best protection is your own firearm.  I live a quarter-mile from the police station, but I am more confident in the deterrent factor of private firearms than in the police to protect me and my family.</p>
<p>Finally, in America, smuggling is the second oldest profession.  If you want it, you can get it, so don&#8217;t think the government could outlaw private firearms any better than it has outlawed marijuana, cocaine, or exotic pets.</p>
<p>In the end, firearms and an armed citizenry will outlive the regulatory state here in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonF</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-241068</link>
		<dc:creator>RonF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-241068</guid>
		<description>Alex:

&lt;i&gt;There should be mandatory gun safety courses to attend. The student must be able to disassemble and reassemble a gun. Learn to shoot and how to clean and care for the weapon.&lt;/i&gt;

All these things are all good ideas for people to do on their own.  But gun ownership is a RIGHT, not a PRIVILEGE.  The government has no right to require such things.

&lt;i&gt;Spend at least 8 hours in community service.&lt;/i&gt;

Why should this have any connection to gun ownership?  How is putting an arbitrary barrier to gun ownership Constitutional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex:</p>
<p><i>There should be mandatory gun safety courses to attend. The student must be able to disassemble and reassemble a gun. Learn to shoot and how to clean and care for the weapon.</i></p>
<p>All these things are all good ideas for people to do on their own.  But gun ownership is a RIGHT, not a PRIVILEGE.  The government has no right to require such things.</p>
<p><i>Spend at least 8 hours in community service.</i></p>
<p>Why should this have any connection to gun ownership?  How is putting an arbitrary barrier to gun ownership Constitutional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-241016</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-241016</guid>
		<description>Every law abiding citizen should own a gun to protect home and family from the thugs that obtain guns no matter what the current law says.

Outlaw Obama and his cronies instead of guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every law abiding citizen should own a gun to protect home and family from the thugs that obtain guns no matter what the current law says.</p>
<p>Outlaw Obama and his cronies instead of guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Shaw</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-240466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-240466</guid>
		<description>Many Democrats would love to burn out the Second Amendment, but I am glad we have it; this makes it difficult to repeal unless all of the 50 states voted. Even then, it would not be repealed. 

Guns are not the problem. Criminals are the problem. 

I would like to see President Obama try to get rid of the Second Amendment. He &amp; any other Democrats would be toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Democrats would love to burn out the Second Amendment, but I am glad we have it; this makes it difficult to repeal unless all of the 50 states voted. Even then, it would not be repealed. </p>
<p>Guns are not the problem. Criminals are the problem. </p>
<p>I would like to see President Obama try to get rid of the Second Amendment. He &amp; any other Democrats would be toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boars hide</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-240318</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boars hide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-240318</guid>
		<description>Thank God I became a cop (27 year). Carry a gun and as the saying goes &quot;I am only minutes away when seconds count.&quot;  Very true statement.  Call comes out, start to roll code 3, take a few minutes to get to different parts of the city, crooks get away, sometimes they don&#039;t. 

The problem is the guns in the hands of thugs.  Get rid of the thugs, problem goes away. Get rid of guns and only thugs will have guns, oh wait they were supposed to give them up too? Must not have received the memo.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God I became a cop (27 year). Carry a gun and as the saying goes &#8220;I am only minutes away when seconds count.&#8221;  Very true statement.  Call comes out, start to roll code 3, take a few minutes to get to different parts of the city, crooks get away, sometimes they don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>The problem is the guns in the hands of thugs.  Get rid of the thugs, problem goes away. Get rid of guns and only thugs will have guns, oh wait they were supposed to give them up too? Must not have received the memo&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Weimer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-daily-beast-chooses-nepotism-over-facts-in-anti-gun-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-239947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Weimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=52592#comment-239947</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oakland Cop Killer Was a Victim, Too

&quot;The police and witnesses have painted a savage picture of Mr. Mixon as a man who stood over his victims, fatally shooting two officers on a street in midday before fleeing into an apartment building, where two SWAT team members died and another officer was injured. Others have portrayed him as a man failed by an overloaded and flawed California penal system where thousands of former inmates flout the parole law and thousands of others skate by in programs where each agent regularly handles dozens of parolees.&quot; -- March 25 story by Jesse McKinley and Solomon Moore on Lovelle Mixon, who shot and killed four Oakland police officers after a traffic stop.&lt;/i&gt;

Quoted above we have a cop-killer. What was his motivation? Why is it only when it &lt;b&gt;may&lt;/b&gt; be ascribed to &#039;right wing&#039; pundits is that motivation put forth? 

There is no evidence that anything said by Glenn Beck motivated Poplawski. So why do you &#039;Pastor&#039; continue to push this line? Especially when there is a more heinous killing goes un-commented by you? Be consistent, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oakland Cop Killer Was a Victim, Too</p>
<p>&#8220;The police and witnesses have painted a savage picture of Mr. Mixon as a man who stood over his victims, fatally shooting two officers on a street in midday before fleeing into an apartment building, where two SWAT team members died and another officer was injured. Others have portrayed him as a man failed by an overloaded and flawed California penal system where thousands of former inmates flout the parole law and thousands of others skate by in programs where each agent regularly handles dozens of parolees.&#8221; &#8212; March 25 story by Jesse McKinley and Solomon Moore on Lovelle Mixon, who shot and killed four Oakland police officers after a traffic stop.</i></p>
<p>Quoted above we have a cop-killer. What was his motivation? Why is it only when it <b>may</b> be ascribed to &#8216;right wing&#8217; pundits is that motivation put forth? </p>
<p>There is no evidence that anything said by Glenn Beck motivated Poplawski. So why do you &#8216;Pastor&#8217; continue to push this line? Especially when there is a more heinous killing goes un-commented by you? Be consistent, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
