The Last of America’s Army in Vietnam

The Hmong fought beside the U.S. during the Vietnam War, but will America even lift a finger as they face extermination at the hands of the communists?

April 25, 2008 - by Richard Fernandez

When Tony Poe, a CIA paramilitary officer leading Hmong guerrillas, ran into a large force of North Vietnamese in northeastern Laos in 1965, he killed a dozen of the enemy in the encounter. Hit in the abdomen and hip, Poe fell back with his tribesmen to an extraction point five miles away.

There, he refused to let the pilot evacuate until 13 injured tribesmen were pulled off the battlefield. The pilot resisted, arguing that they couldn’t take on the extra weight. But Poe threatened to jump if they didn’t go back. The wounded were evacuated safely, though the helicopter motor was ruined. As a result of his actions in this battle, Poe’s stature among the hill tribes soared. “That’s war,” Poe says, matter-of-factly. “If you don’t go back for them, how the hell are you going to ask them to fight for you? You’ve got to take care of your people. That was the only way to get them to fight.”

After the abandonment of South Vietnam, about two million Vietnamese fled the country, half a million of whom eventually found their way to America. Two million Cambodians died from the “re-education” efforts of the communist Khmer Rouge. But while these catastrophes are well known, the genocide in Cambodia even having been made into a Hollywood movie, the tragedy that befell the Hmong was forgotten with the 1960s. Unlike Tony Poe, who believed in keeping faith with peoples who joined America’s cause, the Hmong who stayed behind were forgotten by their “friends”; but they were remembered by their enemies. In the years following the Vietnam War, the Hmong were “hunted like animals.” And they still may be. The Center for Public Policy analysis reported that the Laotian and Vietnamese governments have begun a campaign to wipe out the last holdouts against their regimes.

The Lao Peoples Democratic Republic (LPDR) regime, in cooperation with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV), has issued a new order and drafted a comprehensive strategy to mount a major military offensive to exterminate thousands of Hmong in hiding in the jungles and mountains of Laos. The offensive will involve special battalions of troops and special operations commandos from Vietnam who are now being deployed to the closed military zones of operation. The reported object is to eliminate and exterminate some 15,000 Lao Hmong in hiding in key areas of Laos by the end of April 2008. Hmong in Laos are bracing for these new anticipated attacks by Laos and Vietnam, which are expected to be massive and ruthless.

In December 2007 the New York Times quoted an Amnesty International report “that Laotian troops had been involved in numerous attacks on the veterans and their families across northern Laos in recent years, an assessment shared by American diplomats.” However, a Laotian foreign ministry spokesman interviewed by the Times said these Hmong stragglers were probably “bandits.” Yong Chanthalangsy, spokesman for the Laotian government, told Al Jazeera that no campaign of persecution against the tribesmen was imminent.

“There are thousands if not tens of thousands of people who are joining the government’s rural development program and I have not heard of any persecution.” Asked if the Laos government would invite independent monitors into the country, he said that Laos was working “hand in hand” with neighboring countries to address the issue. “We do not need any intervention from a third party,” he told Al Jazeera. “I don’t see why there should be intervention and interference from outside.”

But the Laotian government’s claims were belied by the reluctance of the Hmong in neighboring countries to return to their homeland, as illustrated by a hunger strike in a refugee camp in Thailand. “They think they will be deported to Laos and are afraid of that,” says Gilles Isard, country director of Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) France, which has been providing relief since 2005. “They say they would rather die than go back to Laos,” he said in an interview. “They are really desperate after hearing the frightening stories of what happens to the Hmong once they are sent back to Laos.”

However that may be, some have argued America has no obligation to help its allies in the Vietnam War. Colin Thompson, a CIA officer in Laos from 1963 to 1966, was quoted by the Times as saying, “it wasn’t as if we dragooned them into anything. Their choice was to defend themselves and we provided the means. We provided the weapons and the courage.” Whatever the truth of the assertion that the Hmong needed courage then, they will need it now.

When Tony Poe died in 2003 in California, his wake was attended by nearly as many Hmong and Yao friends as Americans. “All in all, there were about 150 mourners; approximately half were Hmong while the remainder was family, neighbors, friends, and about eight former CIA types or their representatives.” One of the few obituaries for the man who twice won the CIA’s highest award was written by Richard Erlich of the Asia Times. Ehrlich quoted an email by Philip Smith, executive director of the Washington-based Center for Public Policy Analysis, who said Poe “successfully fought terror with terror. He strove to instill courage and respect in the tribal and indigenous forces that he recruited and trained as well as fear in the enemy. In the post-September 11 security environment, fearless men like Tony Poe are what America needs to combat and counter terrorism and the new unconventional threat that America faces from abroad in exotic and uncharted lands.”

Smith said:

Tony Poe epitomized what the late Theodore Shackley, former CIA station chief in Laos, called the “Third Option.” America — to avoid the potential twin options of using nuclear or conventional forces to defend its interests — should instead rely on special, elite clandestine forces to recruit, train and arm indigenous, or tribal forces, to project power, protect its interests, and counter guerrilla movements, terrorism, or other attacks. Clearly, Tony Poe symbolized America’s decision to exercise its “Third Option” in Laos.

Poe’s small funeral in California was a reminder that America really does not want such ruthless men fighting its wars. And as for the Hmong who fought with him, they are worse than forgotten — they are politically incorrect.

Richard Fernandez writes at the Belmont Club.

Bookmark and Share
Email Print Podcasts Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

15 Comments

1. D. Grant Chee----:

America won it’s last war, 1941,1945. Since then we fought the communist to a draw in Korea and a loss in Vietnam. Politics ruled; under Truman, in Korea and under Johnson in Vietnam. Poe, the Hmong and South Vietnamese who stood with us were abandoned; as doing the right thing became unpopular in the psyche of U.S. citizens and cowardly politician afraid to confront Russia/Chinese puppet masters! We are worse off today, geo-politically, and may never recover our loss of will. This makes the world a very dangerous place that may leave option two-the nuclear option, as the only option. McArthur was right in Korea, and Truman wrong. Johnson entered us into a war that cost more oriental lives than we saved, only to abandon the unfinished mission. U.S. morale rests on mission accomplish/victory!

Facing global Jihad from Islamofacism, the U.S again wants to abandon our military on the battlefield? These citizens are known in the Islamic circle as (dihimmi apologist, or facilitators) for the political submission of the USA to Islam. NOT ON MY WATCH. USArmy (R)

Apr 25, 2008 - 9:15 am 2. Wacky Hermit:

When I was a girl, my family sponsored a Hmong family to emigrate from the refugee camp in Thailand and become U.S. citizens. It was my understanding that those in the refugee camp were waiting for just such opportunities, which were few and far between. Is there anything we can do to help the Hmong come to the U.S.?

Apr 25, 2008 - 10:16 am 3. Larry:

I agree with the comment from D. Grant Chee…. however, the only part of WWII the U.S. won so-to-speak was with Japan when we went nuclear. In Europe, the U.S. policy was not to bomb or kill civilians, we did though, but that is beside the point. The Brits took civilians and civilian-related facilities out. The U.S, for the most-part has been politically correct in all wars. The U.S. was stalemated in Korea, pulled-out of Viet Nam as losers, pulled-out of Iraq the first time, and I predict eill be pulled-out of Iraq the second time. Again, the only Country that the U.S. totally beat was Japan. Don’t you think The Islamists, not to mention China, know that?? The U.S. has nearly always been politically correct, avoided civilian targets, etc. China and Islam know this. Its like a heavy-weight fight. We come into the ring,over-power anyone and everyone, hope the opponent will quit, and never use the knock-out punch. The fight is prolonged, we get beat up some because we won’t knock the opponent out. Our enemy knows that we won’t go nuclear. Islam and China both know if they can ever get into this Country militarily they will take over. What we will do? Go nuclear then and kill ourselves or kill the enemies homeland?

No Democrat wants to confront our enemy on their turf or ours. They think if we pull-out, they’ll leave us alone. No Republican will deliver a knock-out punch (go nuclear). Totally kicking their butts is all these people know or understand and we won’t go there so be getting prepared to have them on your porch.

Apr 25, 2008 - 10:33 am 4. Futbol Argentino Mexicano y espanol » The Last of America’s Army in Vietnam:

[...] Last of America’s Army in Vietnam April 25, 2008 – 3:00 am | malia Escribio un articulo buenisimo hoyAqui hay un pedazo del articuloThe Hmong fought beside the US [...]

Apr 25, 2008 - 2:47 pm 5. Vietnam » John McCain’s Temper Preceded Vietnam:

[...] The Last of America’s Army in VietnamThe Hmong fought beside the US during the Vietnam War, but will America even lift a finger as they face extermination at the hands of the communists? [...]

Apr 25, 2008 - 8:45 pm 6. Egfrow:

Larry:

Agreed, we are always left fighting with our hands tied behind our backs. We won tactically in Vietnam and they were even close to surrendering, that is until the Leftists did a coupe de gras of the US Media and have been in power ever since. I tremble at the day that we are force to fully unleash against our enemies, this day may never come because our youth has been indoctrinated away from the love of their own country and don’t even know what it stands for.

Apr 26, 2008 - 4:05 am 7. Dave:

Perhaps a President who has had a stay at the hanoi hilton might be able to help. I heard he has a temper. One that might cause the right people to worry mightily.

Apr 26, 2008 - 3:00 pm 8. Bob Murphy:

Wretchard, you have to remember that people like the Hmong and the Montagnards were hated and despised by the lowlanders in their countries. At best they were treated like 2ns class citizens, at worst they were hunted.
So it’s not just a Communist thing.
Be that as it may, we owe those people and should do whatever we can to help them.
I think Vietnam has most favored nation status for their exports to the US.
There are lots of ways the US could pressure the Vietnamese and the Laotians to back off.
And we owe, just like we owe the Filipinos and New Guineans and others who helped us against the Japanese in WWII.

Apr 26, 2008 - 7:44 pm 9. Laura:

At the very least, UNESCO should cancel all funds to Laos & Vietnam until amnesty is declared . A lovely city like Luang Prabang becomes a sick Disneyland- like venture if there is jungle warfare existing in the north–especially a campaign to wipe out former US allies.

Apr 27, 2008 - 6:22 am 10. The Hmong: Last American Army in Vietnam:

[...] Fernandez, better known as Wretchard the Cat at the Belmont Club blog, writes at Pajamas Media that: “The Lao Peoples Democratic Republic (LPDR) regime, in cooperation [...]

Apr 28, 2008 - 8:05 am 11. L:

Quote: “Is there anything we can do to help the [pick a group] come to the U.S.?”
I get sooooooo tired of hearing this. The solution to the world’s problems CANNOT be to move every man, woman and child to the U.S.

Apr 29, 2008 - 12:56 am 12. howiem:

No one is saying “move every man, woman and child to the U.S.” No one is saying every Hmong. Every Hmong that fought on our side (and for themselves) who wants to come to the USA should be given the chance. Not everyone in the world.

Apr 30, 2008 - 2:10 am 13. K:

You need to re-read the title of this article again, “L.”

May 4, 2008 - 12:24 am 14. french fry:

I was 1st Air Cav / 1967-68 / 11B so I can say what I waht concerning this subject. Any of them that want to come over here should be welcome with open arms and be given all the help we can offer. They were wonderful people and damn good fighters!!

May 5, 2008 - 4:13 pm 15. Pete:

Where are the marines? No man left behind.

May 31, 2008 - 7:05 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: