<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pajamas Media Election Guide for Dummies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:15:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-144054</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-144054</guid>
		<description>Big Ben:

&quot;Sometimes in life one sees something unfold that is irrational and inexplicable, until after the fact when the Monday morning quarterbacks get to put their 2 cents in.&quot;

I agree with your view; what HAS NOT been discussed is the women vote. First Presidential where a woman can be elected. I don&#039;t think the Polling Data has fully taken this in view. The Media is pushing for the first black President even though he is an EMPTY SUIT. They have been completely blind to the first Woman elected as Vice President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Ben:</p>
<p>&#8220;Sometimes in life one sees something unfold that is irrational and inexplicable, until after the fact when the Monday morning quarterbacks get to put their 2 cents in.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with your view; what HAS NOT been discussed is the women vote. First Presidential where a woman can be elected. I don&#8217;t think the Polling Data has fully taken this in view. The Media is pushing for the first black President even though he is an EMPTY SUIT. They have been completely blind to the first Woman elected as Vice President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George B</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-144021</link>
		<dc:creator>George B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-144021</guid>
		<description>It is much easier to come up with ways that Obama wins than with ways that McCain wins.  Wish it wasn&#039;t so, McCain has to be lucky and the polls have to be inaccurate for McCain to win.

Earlier today I commented to a coworker that I thought the Democrat/Republican poll weighting assumed too much advantage for Democrats.  He observed that polling companies need to be accurate enough to get future business.  A somewhat cynical person would say that the optimum poll model would favor Democrats by enough to allow the customer, media organizations, to write the stories they want to write while being close enough to reality to justify future business.  This plus experience with the 2000 and 2004 elections suggests that McCain will outperform the latest state polls, but probably not by enough to change who moves into the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is much easier to come up with ways that Obama wins than with ways that McCain wins.  Wish it wasn&#8217;t so, McCain has to be lucky and the polls have to be inaccurate for McCain to win.</p>
<p>Earlier today I commented to a coworker that I thought the Democrat/Republican poll weighting assumed too much advantage for Democrats.  He observed that polling companies need to be accurate enough to get future business.  A somewhat cynical person would say that the optimum poll model would favor Democrats by enough to allow the customer, media organizations, to write the stories they want to write while being close enough to reality to justify future business.  This plus experience with the 2000 and 2004 elections suggests that McCain will outperform the latest state polls, but probably not by enough to change who moves into the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdkchem</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143946</link>
		<dc:creator>jdkchem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143946</guid>
		<description>Willful delusion?  Believing any polling is accurate or scientific.  If you throw enough darts you will eventual hit the bulls-eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willful delusion?  Believing any polling is accurate or scientific.  If you throw enough darts you will eventual hit the bulls-eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denise</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143933</link>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143933</guid>
		<description>Anti Jihadist:  Applying the lowest common denominator to add the fractions, I get 149/600 chance of McCain winning.  That&#039;s very close to 25%.  If my math is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti Jihadist:  Applying the lowest common denominator to add the fractions, I get 149/600 chance of McCain winning.  That&#8217;s very close to 25%.  If my math is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VekTor</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143929</link>
		<dc:creator>VekTor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143929</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain has a 1.9% chance of winning tonight. That’s according to fivethirtyeight.com. Before you dismiss the results as MSM propaganda, consider that 538 has no bias.&quot;

Dude, warn me before you do something like that!  Do you know how expensive it is to replace a shorted-out flat-panel LCD after you do a spit take all over it?!?

You only need to look at how Nate decided to change his &quot;method of allocating undecided votes&quot; in to see how seriously partisan Nate is.  He&#039;s so far in the tank that he can&#039;t even see the surface any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain has a 1.9% chance of winning tonight. That’s according to fivethirtyeight.com. Before you dismiss the results as MSM propaganda, consider that 538 has no bias.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dude, warn me before you do something like that!  Do you know how expensive it is to replace a shorted-out flat-panel LCD after you do a spit take all over it?!?</p>
<p>You only need to look at how Nate decided to change his &#8220;method of allocating undecided votes&#8221; in to see how seriously partisan Nate is.  He&#8217;s so far in the tank that he can&#8217;t even see the surface any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letalis Maximus, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143927</link>
		<dc:creator>Letalis Maximus, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143927</guid>
		<description>Drinking the Kool-Aide?

Why, that&#039;s five yards short of common sense.

I&#039;m drinking Miller, right now.

That&#039;s living the &quot;High Life.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drinking the Kool-Aide?</p>
<p>Why, that&#8217;s five yards short of common sense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m drinking Miller, right now.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s living the &#8220;High Life.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windingstad</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143895</link>
		<dc:creator>Windingstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143895</guid>
		<description>#29, 
Point taken, but I don&#039;t think that was what the vice ambassodor was referring to;) His point obviously was that Obama would face the same constraints that any American president does, and is not gonna turn America into Sweden just overnight.

Good luck anyway, it&#039;s not over for ya yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#29,<br />
Point taken, but I don&#8217;t think that was what the vice ambassodor was referring to;) His point obviously was that Obama would face the same constraints that any American president does, and is not gonna turn America into Sweden just overnight.</p>
<p>Good luck anyway, it&#8217;s not over for ya yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna V.</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143890</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143890</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Just got there to hear the vice ambassador warn us against expecting too much from an Obama administration&lt;/i&gt;

The vice ambassador should come speak to young American Obama voters.  The two in front of me in the polling line today apparently believe that Obama execretes lollipops and the world will be filled with cuddly bunnies and dancing unicorns when he enters the White House.

Americans will wake up - if not today, at some point within the next 4 years.  And when the Obamessiah crashes, he will crash hard.  Unfortunately, we might all go with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Just got there to hear the vice ambassador warn us against expecting too much from an Obama administration</i></p>
<p>The vice ambassador should come speak to young American Obama voters.  The two in front of me in the polling line today apparently believe that Obama execretes lollipops and the world will be filled with cuddly bunnies and dancing unicorns when he enters the White House.</p>
<p>Americans will wake up &#8211; if not today, at some point within the next 4 years.  And when the Obamessiah crashes, he will crash hard.  Unfortunately, we might all go with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apsen Observer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143883</link>
		<dc:creator>Apsen Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143883</guid>
		<description>Have a link some of you may wish to read. It is accessed via the &quot;classical values&quot; blog site on Pajamams Media.
http//seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/toast/

Its a very long and detailed post, which if true, will make Western Penn. the bell weather to watch if there is to be an upset. The keystone state may well be the bump in the road which upsets the &quot;Ones&quot; victory chariot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a link some of you may wish to read. It is accessed via the &#8220;classical values&#8221; blog site on Pajamams Media.<br />
http//seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/toast/</p>
<p>Its a very long and detailed post, which if true, will make Western Penn. the bell weather to watch if there is to be an upset. The keystone state may well be the bump in the road which upsets the &#8220;Ones&#8221; victory chariot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ben</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-pajamas-media-election-guide-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-143863</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=37897#comment-143863</guid>
		<description>Sometimes in life one sees something unfold that is irrational and inexplicable, until after the fact when the Monday morning quarterbacks get to put their 2 cents in.
One such example was the odds against the Giants winning the Super Bowl last year, prior to the Tampa Bay Game; Other examples are the  Israeli war of Preservation in 1948 and our own Revolutionary War.
McCain will win because as Dick Morris explained, the pollsters have no paradigm to guide them here.
When was the last time that we had a national election where one party was totally backed by a &quot;gracious&quot; mass media and a general innuendo was publically floated that someone voting against the annointed was a racist or worse.

A mild example of the current contest, and a possible harbinger of a similar result, was the second Dinkins- Giuliani NYC mayoral race.

All the polls had Dinkins ahead, the exit polls showed him ahead by +3, and all the networks declared the mayor the winner.
In the morning, I woke up to the radio announcer saying that Giuliani had won. Even the exit polls had been off by at least 4 %.
The reason, in retrospect, was clear; A significant number of voters were not comfortable telling the pollsters that they did not vote for the black candidate in a racially charged caampaign where the media was in the tank for the black candidate.
Just recently the racial charge was preemptively launched by Chris Matthews on MSNBC, Joel Klein, Erica Jong and others.
Look for the exit polls to be incorrect not in states like New Hampshire, which is homogenously white, but in states such as Pennsylvania,Florida,Ohio and yes Virginia, where there exists both large moderate white population centers and also politically self-confident black urban areas.

In other words, no one knows who is favored, as the polls are not accurate, but I believe McCain has the edge given Obama&#039;s radical associations and unconventional past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes in life one sees something unfold that is irrational and inexplicable, until after the fact when the Monday morning quarterbacks get to put their 2 cents in.<br />
One such example was the odds against the Giants winning the Super Bowl last year, prior to the Tampa Bay Game; Other examples are the  Israeli war of Preservation in 1948 and our own Revolutionary War.<br />
McCain will win because as Dick Morris explained, the pollsters have no paradigm to guide them here.<br />
When was the last time that we had a national election where one party was totally backed by a &#8220;gracious&#8221; mass media and a general innuendo was publically floated that someone voting against the annointed was a racist or worse.</p>
<p>A mild example of the current contest, and a possible harbinger of a similar result, was the second Dinkins- Giuliani NYC mayoral race.</p>
<p>All the polls had Dinkins ahead, the exit polls showed him ahead by +3, and all the networks declared the mayor the winner.<br />
In the morning, I woke up to the radio announcer saying that Giuliani had won. Even the exit polls had been off by at least 4 %.<br />
The reason, in retrospect, was clear; A significant number of voters were not comfortable telling the pollsters that they did not vote for the black candidate in a racially charged caampaign where the media was in the tank for the black candidate.<br />
Just recently the racial charge was preemptively launched by Chris Matthews on MSNBC, Joel Klein, Erica Jong and others.<br />
Look for the exit polls to be incorrect not in states like New Hampshire, which is homogenously white, but in states such as Pennsylvania,Florida,Ohio and yes Virginia, where there exists both large moderate white population centers and also politically self-confident black urban areas.</p>
<p>In other words, no one knows who is favored, as the polls are not accurate, but I believe McCain has the edge given Obama&#8217;s radical associations and unconventional past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
