What we have is a corrupt corporate state, run by corrupt companies who are merely using our Bailout tax dollars to pay for executive bonuses, junkets, and to buy each other out — while throwing scraps to the poor surfs getting stuck with the bill. It’s got to stop–and that means getting rid of those who voted “yes.”

It’s time to just start over. Throw them all out, Dems and Republicans alike. There isn’t an ounce of difference between them anymore anyway. Could the Libertarians or Greens really do any worse than this?

We can start by voting “no” against incumbants who voted “yes” for the Bailout. Don’t know who they are? Check out Constituent Response’s Bailout Vote Map at constituentresponse.com .

I get hammered all the time with baseless attacks. If I’m condescending, it’s merely to respond in-kind to the treatment I receive here. Besides – Momof3 exposed her astonishing ignorance and I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to point that out. Global warming is not a matter of “opinion.”

As to your flimsy argument that just because somethings were incorrectly understood as “science”, nothing known as “science” can be absolutely true, try this: Remember last year when a bunch of people thought global warming was a myth? Wow did they look dumb.

1) An ideology that completely mirrors the ideology of this past 8 years.
2) An ideology that recognizes the few while completely disregarding the masses.
3) An ideology that believes in taking military action against Iraq, an incident that is completely unrelated to 9/11, without solidifying our claims beforehand. In the present, we have found no evidence of weapons of mass destructions or a tie to Osama Bin Laden. The devastation of this war has cost us over 4,000 of our brave troops and counting, over 1/2 trillion dollars of taxpayer’s money and counting, and over 1 million Iraqi lives unrelated to the terrorists or insurgency.

Cost of the Iraq War — http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home

4) An ideology that still believes that the Iraq War is the right war on terrorism when the Afghanistan War should had been the right war on terrorism, where Osama Bin Laden actually was until he slipped into the mountains and into Pakistan’s territory now. The Iraq War also diverted our attention away from the Afghanistan War. We now have extended our resources in two separate places and have heightened our risk to our troops, our expenses, and creating another dilemma that will take quite some time to finalize. The Iraq War will not go away overnight and it is now our obligation to see it all the way through for God knows how many more years. This has also been the most unpopular war in the eyes of the world’s communities.
5) An ideology that believes that we are at our safest state since 9/11, when a recent terrorist plot was still trying to enter Great Britain’s airports with liquid explosives heading directly to us, but thankfully the plot was foiled. While in Afghanistan, the terrorists are regrouping and strengthening and we have recently suffered another high casualty to our troops yet again within this past month. We currently have the least amount of alliances in the world’s communities due to this unpopular Iraq War. True national securities are the ties that bind us to our world’s communities and the ties that bind them to us.
6) An ideology that vetted one of the most inexperience VP ticket in history, from foreign policies to national defense. If God forbids that anything happens to this President if elected and is stricken with illness, this VP will be running the country. For a more compelling look at Sarah Palin’s VP readiness, please look at these links below —

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loUHRv3ipLE

http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2008/09/30/palin_gaffes/

7) An ideology that believes in “the fundamentals of our economy are strong” while we are facing the highest mortgage foreclosure crisis, high unemployment rate, and the largest collapse of our financial infrastructures since The Great Depression of 1929.

This is an ideology that many of us in America are against. Whether this ideology is in the Republican or Democratic ticket is not the main issue but the fact is that America does not want to fall into another 4 more years of devastation. We cannot afford this anymore.

So here is a simple fact for America -
1) During Ronald Reagan’s Presidency of 2 terms, between 1981-1989, we were at our economic best in a quarter of a century. We made the right choice in these 8 years as a country.
2) During George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Presidency of 1 term, between 1989-1993, we were at our economic worst in a quarter of a century. We made a huge mistake as a country but corrected it by keeping him in office for only 1 term.
3) During Bill Clinton’s Presidency of 2 terms, between 1993-2001, we were again at our economic best in a quarter of a century, even better than Reagan’s era. We made the right choice again in these 8 years as a country, despite his personal scandals.
4) Now, during George W. Bush Jr.’s Presidency of 2 terms, between 2001-this coming January 20, 2009; we have been at our economic worst in a quarter of a century, even worst than Bush Sr.’s era. We really made a huge mistake as a country on this one by not realizing that the apple really doesn’t fall very far from the tree. Yet we chose this apple again the second time around.

Now, really let this simple fact sink in America and take your time to think carefully this time around about how you want the direction of this country to go.

We made history with Reagan. We then made a mistake with Bush Sr. but corrected history by allowing him to only serve 1 term. We then made history again with Clinton, despite his personal scandals. Now, we have made 2 mistakes with Bush Jr. by allowing him to serve not once, but twice. So my last question to America is, guess which candidate shares the interests of both, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr.? I will let America answer this one. We are much, much smarter as a country to want to make history rather than make mistakes and to suffer yet again from our own mistakes by not using objectivity as our first and foremost agenda.

I believe we should be good stewards and not be wasteful and there is plenty to do and change, but promoting the idea that unless trillions are spent in the next 5 to 10 years, the planet will die???

in the last 100 years, the science consensus has been reported to be ice age, heat age, ice age, heat age, over and over again. In 1975 the world was doomed to ice age, in 1981, unprecedented heat was predicted. the heat wave of the mid 1990s foretold of the impending flooding of florida and NYC, now the current cooling trend has been called more proof of climate change that humans are causing.

seems to be a lot of loose change that does not have a lot of meaning or relevance apart from political agendas.

The great thing is that you’ll be losing all of your power in the next few weeks and I seriously doubt the American people will be hearing from you again for a long, long while. I’m sure you’ll still have Rush and the voices in your head to keep you company.”

Daniel, this is why I cannot support liberals / Democrats, all of your posts are talking point from move on, Daily Kos, etc. And if anyone does not agree with you, why not curse them and call them brainless and idiots.

Your use of profanity takes away from any point you make, and lowers your ability to make a point. Very well done, you have made the case better than all the other posters as to why the USA will be worse off with liberals in charge.

and by the way, since you are so sure of yourself, why not proudly place your full name on the posts, you should get all the credit.

Was it entirely necessary for you to insert that last sentence, “It’s so simple that even you can understand it,” into your reply to “momof3:” ??

I detected nothing more than a statement of her honest opinion. Your closing line is snide and insulting. How do you justify it from the text of her post.

And, by the way, things such as “flogeston” were once accepted science as well. Perhaps you remember.