Comments on: The ‘Right-Wing Extremism’ Report and Europeanization

By: Mitt Karbit

Mitt Karbit — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:06:47 +0000

This article seems very confused. The terms “right wing ” and “left wing” change from time to time. When left and right was first defined in 18th century France, the left was associated with capitalism and free market. The right on the other hand advocated the divine rule of the monarch and his government. As time passed, socialism and communism were invented and they were considered so far left that the old left became the new right. The Nazi hark back to the old right which has become the extreme right.

By: deguello

deguello — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:53:57 +0000

Well,well,I made you smile;that’s good!As far as the future is concerned;I’d like to agree with you. However, I think I’ve got this guy pegged correctly, as a Chavez wannabe,backed by a political party composed of pandering,economically illiterate demagogues. Sex tapes or , or not ,it’s going to be interesting;as yo said, time will tell.

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:16 +0000

Deguello – “performance art” …ok, now that was actually funny. I’ll give you that.

And I’ll agree stylistically pretentious as well, but it’s still a verb. However, I don’t use the word ‘argue’ because I’m not arguing…I’m discussing (which is the difference between you and I…). But as it happened, I got awfully tired of saying discussing so I said dialoging to mix it up. I’ll take it up with my writing staff that you didn’t care for it and we’ll try to get a new mental Thesaurus.

That said, you (and others) are anticipating the end of the country in the next 4 years, goulags, the soon to be released Chavez/Obama secret sex tape, everyone losing their guns, and all sorts of other outlandish things. I have a very hard time DISCUSSING issues like that because you are so far to the Right I think you can’t here me over in the relativistic center as you have fallen into Chicken Little land and there is no bringing you back. Time will tell, but until then there doesn’t seem to be any point in DISCUSSING things with you, as I don’t think you are open to listening to any other viewpoint than your own.

Maybe once you are in your 30’s (assuming you aren’t) you’ll have a bit more perspective.

Jack

By: deguello

deguello — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:06:41 +0000

JACK:that “A” was a typo,my mistake;Mea Culpa.Deguello,is indeed a bugle call(and a flag) both used at the Alamo,but not only there, to indicate that no quarter would be given.It has other meanings derived from the above-stated. For example,it’s the method of execution favored by those who profess the religion of peace,(beheading using a knife):the idiot Napolitano might call it a “man made catastrophe”.Other appeasing libtards might call it performance art.Finally, it also means a catastrophic state of total warfare characterized by massacre.I use the tag to allude to the (not so distant) future,where the right wing resistance,anticipating gulags,finally gives the left what it deserves for nearly 50 years of torture,murder,and government oppression. ‘Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished : Think Chile,and Spain.I will concede, that the .COM ,dictionary does indeed permit the use of dialogue as a verb;however,other dictionaries do not:it’s stylistically pretentious.Use argue instead;dialog is the kind of thing a therapist, professor of education, community organizer,George Bush,Janet Napolitano, or other virulent, half-witted social parasites routinely employ to add weight,to their idiocies.Are we ready to play tiddly winks yet? QUE VIVA EL DEGUELLO!

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:00:28 +0000

Dictionary.com

di-a-logue: [dahy-uh-lawg, -log] noun, verb -logued, -loguing.

–verb (used without object) 5. to carry on a dialogue; converse.
6. to discuss areas of disagreement frankly in order to resolve them.

While there you can also find that ‘deguello’ was the title of a bugle call the Mexicans used while fighting our troops at the Alamo. Nice choice of names. It also appears to end with an ‘o’ and not an ‘a’ as you assert.

Jack

By: deguello

deguello — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:23:44 +0000

JACK:Funny, neither did the folks who wrote the dictionary.

By: Jack

Jack — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:36 +0000

Deguello – Just like you knew deguello ends with an ‘a’. And dialoging is a verb, I don’t even know how you don’t get that.

By: deguello

deguello — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:31:22 +0000

You “knew” I was a guy? Just like you “knew”dialog”(sic)was a verb,and how you weren’t defending the memo. OK.,If you say so.Go back to playing tic tac toe with your classmates.

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:15:51 +0000

Deguello – I knew you were a guy, I was being condescending because you are a tool. It’s a shame that was what it took to actually get you to almost talk about issues, but since you did…

1. We clearly disagree on this one and it’s being thoroughly covered in another thread that is entirely about this topic.
2. Addressed that here already.
3. Bailouts were clearly done the wrong way and tax breaks would have been a better way to have stirred the economy.

- Napolitano has not been impressive to say the very least. And I don’t know how anyone can clam that something with the word ‘illegal’ in it is legal…

- I wasn’t defending the memo on the vets, I was stating that my interpretation was not that it was saying that vets are going to rise up, just that vets might be targetted by those who want to rise up. So you misunderstood me.

- If libs believe that “patriotism was the last refuge of the scoundrel” then I was never informed or I’m not a lib.

Nothing else in your diatribe merits a response.

Jack

By: deguello

deguello — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:00:53 +0000

JACK! GREETINGS! I’ve see that you’ve been busy infesting PJM with your libtard drool;time to bring you up short. I’m afraid that if you thought that your little “critiques”( I am being kind)of my responses to your libtard drool would convince your special education teacher to mainstream you back into normality,then you are going to be disappointed.Thanks for promoting me as a spokesperson for those who disagree with you;but I don’t pretend to speak for anyone but myself,although I can see that as an Obama voter, you assume that we conservatives need a leader to follow as badly as you do. Let’s adress your little alleged visit to the dictionary(surely a big first for you).You claim that your half-wittwed and pretentious solecism ..”the manner in which youi dialog is correct English,because “DIALOGUING”, as a verb, is in the dictionary. Thaat’s funny:the Random House Dictionary of Modern English(2nd edition) lists the verb form of dialogue as DIALOGIZE;not dialog.Not only are you pretentious ,you are a liar as well.I would love” dogging” libtards, unfortunately,I love dogs, and feeding them toxic waste would poison them;there are other ways though!More ignorance: DEGUELLO has an a at the end, which in Spanish indicates the masculine noun: please keep that in mind,when referring to me as “her”. You accuse me of acting like a 12 year old when your educational level is evidently way below that.Let’s adress your need to “dialog” with me,and to challenge me to name three Obama policies I disagree with,(only three?)Let’s start with:1. a foreign policy based cringing appeasement,and unilateral disarmament; 2.Public funding of ACORN street thugs who regularly attempt to falsify elections;3.Bailouts to help the corrupt banks which bankrolled his election effort. But let’s return to this memo.written by a ditz who has said that the 911 terrorists entered the country through Canada,(they didn’t);and that “illegal”immigration “is not a crime”;(it is). What kind of credibility can a memo from this manifest boob have?In your post#11 you defend the memo,implying, that recent political protests by conservatives were not patriotic,What hypocrites you libs are! I thought you folks believed that: “patriotism was the last refuge of the scoundrel”?Apparently not when a libtard needs to use this particular refuge to house conservative political dissent.This memo is nothing but an outline of incipient totalitarianism;a “wish” list for leftist repression. Defending, it, compromises your credibility,exposes you as a fraud and puts you in the same virulent category,as Holocaust deniers,Castro sympathizers,and Nation of Islam members.As far as playing toc tac toe with you,I thought the idea was to show your special needs teacher that you could play more difficult games..There are other games we(and our respective allies)will be playing someday, Jack,and it won’t be anything as harmless as tic tac toe.