Comments on: The Unfairness of Reviving the Fairness Doctrine http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/ Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:12:59 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: deguello http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-219339 deguello Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:41:10 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-219339 RE: 14 PETE: DIVERSITY OF OWNERSHIP: LIBTARDESE FOR FREE SPEECH SUPPRESSION. SCRATCH A LIBERAL'UNCOVER A STALINIST! RE: 14 PETE: DIVERSITY OF OWNERSHIP: LIBTARDESE FOR FREE SPEECH SUPPRESSION. SCRATCH A LIBERAL’UNCOVER A STALINIST!

]]> By: mimi http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-217473 mimi Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:55:28 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-217473 Has Ashton Kutcher been here? Has Ashton Kutcher been here?

]]> By: Revoltocon http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-217241 Revoltocon Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:06:17 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-217241 The White House has been using suppression of speech (and truth) since Mr. Hope-n-Change began campaigning, and the only bigger whiner than Obama back then would be Obama right now! But I'm not whining when I say that I have less confidence in him than Wall Street does. I'm just stating a fact about a truly pathetic situation. The White House has been using suppression of speech (and truth) since Mr. Hope-n-Change began campaigning, and the only bigger whiner than Obama back then would be Obama right now!
But I’m not whining when I say that I have less confidence in him than Wall Street does. I’m just stating a fact about a truly pathetic situation.

]]> By: Blaine http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216925 Blaine Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:14:37 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216925 Would the fairness doctrine apply to the White House? Every time they call out Rush will they have to call out a liberal demagogue? Seriously Blaine Would the fairness doctrine apply to the White House? Every time they call out Rush will they have to call out a liberal demagogue?
Seriously
Blaine

]]> By: deguello http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216450 deguello Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:27:43 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216450 24&25 DR.ZEN: I was not aware that they issued doctorates in tertiary syphillis.Which Ivy League school did you attend? I know other liberals,similarly afflicted, who want to attend. Is there affirmative action for VD patients, under the americans with disabilities act? 24&25 DR.ZEN: I was not aware that they issued doctorates in tertiary syphillis.Which Ivy League school did you attend? I know other liberals,similarly afflicted, who want to attend. Is there affirmative action for VD patients, under the americans with disabilities act?

]]> By: deguello http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216447 deguello Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:20:17 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216447 CORRECTION: ABOVE POST SHOULD READ:#16 Sorry #6! CORRECTION: ABOVE POST SHOULD READ:#16 Sorry #6!

]]> By: deguello http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216443 deguello Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:18:28 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216443 #6 COMMIE ATHEIST: Well lied;only a commie atheist degenerate can lie so well using a totally obsolete,meaninglees rule,and pretend it has any relevance to modern communications. Hey CT: have of thought of working for Castro? I could quote you the first amendment, but reading that to a commie, would be like explaining modern sanitation to a mound of excrement.See you at the revolution comrade! #6 COMMIE ATHEIST: Well lied;only a commie atheist degenerate can lie so well using a totally obsolete,meaninglees rule,and pretend it has any relevance to modern communications. Hey CT: have of thought of working for Castro? I could quote you the first amendment, but reading that to a commie, would be like explaining modern sanitation to a mound of excrement.See you at the revolution comrade!

]]> By: ked5 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216358 ked5 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:11:05 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216358 oops, that should have been #15. oops, that should have been #15.

]]> By: ked5 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216357 ked5 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:10:23 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216357 #16 Peter, I think you misunderstood. McE was saying the right *isn't* whining about being consigned to radio. He is implying the leftist are complaining their dominance over MSM and print isn't enough. (hmm, makes me think of a two-year old. I want it *aaaallll*. It's not fair, wah) They want to control radio too. (after all, it's the one people listen to while trapped in their cars . . . . though since so many are loosing jobs, there aren't as many trapped in their cars of late.) #16
Peter, I think you misunderstood. McE was saying the right *isn’t* whining about being consigned to radio. He is implying the leftist are complaining their dominance over MSM and print isn’t enough. (hmm, makes me think of a two-year old. I want it *aaaallll*. It’s not fair, wah) They want to control radio too. (after all, it’s the one people listen to while trapped in their cars . . . . though since so many are loosing jobs, there aren’t as many trapped in their cars of late.)

]]> By: marymcl http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-unfairness-of-reviving-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-216062 marymcl Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:23:20 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=48219#comment-216062 Anyone who doesn't realize, let alone appreciate, the difference in actual POWER between a popular radio personality and the federal government of the United States is stupid beyond belief. It's fantastic, really, how the leftists (and almost all the resident trolls are here - hey guys!) have come out in force on the side of censorship. But that's the beautiful thing about reactionary partisanship - people nail their true colors to the mast for all to see. @20 Marc Malone - Exactly. A good example of what you're talking about would be Peter Matthiessen's book about Leonard Peltier, "In the Spirit of Crazy Horse". If memory serves, an FBI agent involved in the case sued the author and his publisher, which kept the book out of print for ten years. Anyone who doesn’t realize, let alone appreciate, the difference in actual POWER between a popular radio personality and the federal government of the United States is stupid beyond belief.

It’s fantastic, really, how the leftists (and almost all the resident trolls are here – hey guys!) have come out in force on the side of censorship. But that’s the beautiful thing about reactionary partisanship – people nail their true colors to the mast for all to see.

@20 Marc Malone – Exactly. A good example of what you’re talking about would be Peter Matthiessen’s book about Leonard Peltier, “In the Spirit of Crazy Horse”. If memory serves, an FBI agent involved in the case sued the author and his publisher, which kept the book out of print for ten years.

]]>