Twittering to Terrorists
The new fun, cool technology can help savvy jihadists track and kill American soldiers.
Still, there are some good reasons to think about it. One of them is the common use of Twitter by U.S. personnel. Of course, soldiers want their families and friends to know what they’re doing; it’s important to everyone’s morale. But the “red team” has some interesting examples, like these from Afghanistan:
“I’m in Bagram waiting for a flight to Camp Salemo by Kwost in the volatile east of Afghanistan near the Paki. border. Hot days cold nights.”
“Hi from Bagram air field; 20 minutes from now I’ll hopefully board a flight to the Pakistan border.”
“Flying to Bagram, Afghanistan in 12 hours. The journey is about to begin.”
These seem like pretty benign things on their own, but let’s think about what an intelligence service would do with them. It’s a process called “traffic analysis,” one that I first learned about when we thought the next war was likely to start in the Fulda Gap.
Someone sits and collects these sorts of messages — then, we listened on radio; now, someone could follow a Twitter feed — and we keep track of the names involved. Over time, a picture builds up: Larry, in the 101st Airborne, was in North Carolina; now he’s on a plane to Afghanistan; something’s happening in Afghanistan. Gene is off to Fort Huachuca — what’s there? Wikipedia knows: the Army intelligence school. Add that to the list; Gene’s an intel guy.
Over time, this kind of information can add up; it’s generally a lot more important, and more likely to tell us something useful, than intercepting Boris calling Natasha to say “vee execute plan on Monday.” Get enough names and you can also use social network analysis (SNA) to identify networks of associated people. Now, SNA can sometimes give false leads. One famous, possibly apocryphal, example was a social network analysis of some of the 9/11 terrorists that identified Mohamed Atta as the core and probable leader of the group, but also identified the best falafel restaurants in South Florida. Like with any intelligence, it depends on collecting hints that may turn into a picture of something important.
On the other side, a black hat with a GPS phone equipped with a camera — an iPhone, say — can be pretty useful too. Ahmed the Black Hat can wander down the street, take a quick snapshot of a U.S. convoy going by, and email it, with GPS information, anywhere in the world. Or Twitter it. Give us enough guys with iPhones and you could quickly have a very complete picture of U.S. soldiers’ motions throughout Iraq.
The Wired article is pretty dismissive of the whole thing. Sort of “hah hah, the government’s worrying about Twitter now.” I’m not sure that’s quite justified; the kind of information I’m talking about, these kinds of analysis of movements and networks, are pretty much the core of real intelligence work.
On the other hand, it would be difficult — and a constant annoyance to people going about their normal lives — if we tried to really prevent black hats from using cellphones and Twitter.
On balance, it’s probably best if we remember that these things can be useful to the black hats; when the Army wants to cut back, as I’m sure they will, on the use of Twitter by people in real operations, it’s worth remembering that they have real reasons, reasons that can save lives even if they annoy families.
<- Prev Page 2 of 2
Charlie Martin is a Colorado computer scientist and freelance writer. He holds an MS in Computer Science from Duke University, where he spent six years with the National Biomedical Simulation Resource, Duke University Medical Center. Find him at http://chasrmartin.com, and on his blog at http://explorations.chasrmartin.com.
![]() |
![]() |
Podcasts | PJM Home |





PJM Home


Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
10 Comments
1. Kevin:Every form of communication is ALSO used to feed the enemy a lot of misinformation.
Oct 31, 2008 - 4:38 am 2. Andrew Ian Dodge:If we were paranoid about terrorists using it we would only use cans & string between houses. Expect any technological development to be abused in the wrong hands…its a given.
Oct 31, 2008 - 6:40 am 3. Jor the plumber:A really good scanner can get your phone conversation. If your phone is coldless and a cell phone.
Oct 31, 2008 - 5:49 pm 4. Harry I Brown:Why can’t we flood the enemy with phony twitter (disinformation). Then they will have a hard time separating the good stuff from the junk.
Oct 31, 2008 - 6:15 pm 5. Joshua:I have been watching many documentaries on The Military Channel about how brilliantly the British duped the Nazi’s in WW2. Even as late as D-Day+30, Hitler was still not convinced that the Normandy operation was not a deception to lure his defenses away from the real invasion sites at Pas-de-Calais and/or Norway (Operation “Fortitude”).
Stalin almost never believed the accurate information that the British and Americans were feeding him until we started transmitting it to him through his spy network in Europe. Then he believed it.
I assume we are doing similar things with our present enemies, so why worry so much about “twitter”?
#4: Or better yet, use fake twitter to lead the enemy to walk into an ambush we set up for them.
Oct 31, 2008 - 7:33 pm 6. fred:What is disturbing is not the potential use of this technology to the enemy. Eventually he’s going to adapt too. That is the nature of warfare. The trick is to be more adaptive and innovative than the enemy is. So, you are always striving to get up the curve faster than he is. That’s dependent upon your resources and brain power.
What is disturbing is the irreverent and flip attitude of the Wired people. They just don’t “get it.” As with so many in the West since the beginning of the contemporary recrudescence of Islamic jihad when the Soviets kick-started the PLO and helped the Muslim Brotherhood, there is a disturbing lack of appreciation of the determination and fanaticism of the revival of Muhammad’s project, now 1,400 years extant.
Those who do not respect their enemies do not respect themselves.
Oct 31, 2008 - 7:42 pm 7. jvon:Wired is half right. The government’s knee-jerk reaction to new technology is to try to regulate it because it might pose a security threat. As far as they attempt to do that, they will be ridiculed, and rightly so.
However, I’m glad people inside the military are considering the uses of Twitter and other similar services. If they are not being used already, they will be.
Nov 1, 2008 - 10:09 am 8. Mike:I’m quite sure the Wired people “get it.” This is a typical OTT knee-jerk reaction by the government. Not including any sort of operational details in open source communications is common sense. No dates, times, locations etc etc.
Terrorists can and will use all forms of media/com. They could pass messages through the comments section of pajamasmedia. Shall we close down pajamasmedia?
Sorry, but that’s just the price you pay for living in a free and open society. It’s a risk that we will just have to deal with. Do you think the Soviets didn’t use The Washington Post to pass info?
Of course we could turn everything in 1984, but then we’d be doing the terrorists work for them. No thanks.
Nov 1, 2008 - 6:58 pm 9. ron c:In WW2 the slogan ws “A slip of the lip can sink a ship”, so the world has not changed.
We in the world need to remind ourselves that a WAR is going on.
Nov 2, 2008 - 12:19 pm 10. Pajamas Media » Obama’s Inevitable Crackberry Withdrawal:[...] not just the content of his emails that can be revealing: as I discussed in my recent article about the security risks of using Twitter, there is another kind of intelligence gathering, called traffic analysis, in which the mere fact [...]
Nov 17, 2008 - 1:20 am