700 billion could instead be used to create METHANOL industry and convert all american cars to methanol.

This could be done fast and next year we will not be importing any oil, so 700 bill spend will come back in 2 years

You’re pretty sensitive, are you?

Relax and read back what I wrote. What insults? Have someone else interpret it for you. Seriously.

NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEEEE.

You still have said nothing to explain why, in your opinion, Zerobama “is the best choice.”

NO ONE’S HOLDING THEIR BREATH, but you’re making a fool of yourself by merely hurling your words without any basis or explanation (9/18, 2:50am).

You ARE, however, confirming what most jargon-thick, reason-thin Leftists (whether on Axelrod’s Astroturf payroll or not) tend to do: mumble, stumble and, when questioned, spew vitriol.

If my answer is “nonsense”, maybe you can’t read short answers.

I’m not here to “defend” my points, especially about “Zerobama”, never heard of it. “Chicago political machine”"? That’s something from the 20th century. Nonsense.

Did you have a good day?

Maybe you are upset about what “Jeff” said. You can’t stomach the truth . . .

NOW THAT YOU HAVE LOST ALL RESPECT AND CREDIBILITY HERE AT PJM, just WHAT do you think anyone here care what you say?

1) McCain was previously against oil drilling in ANWR, Alaska; off the coast of Florida; off the coast of the Gulf of Mexico; and off the coast of California. Now he is for “drill baby drill”.
2) McCain was against Federal regulations of America’s largest financial institutions like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG. Now, after these financial institutions are collapsing, he is promoting Federal regulations to control them so that this crisis will not happen again. He now wants more Federal regulations of Wall Street altogether. Wouldn’t this be considered as socialism that most conservatives do not want? Also, please do not forget McCain’s past involvement in the Keating Five as an example that his future plans for Federal regulations of financial institutions will not work —

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

3) McCain has said over and over that, “the fundamentals of our economy are strong” in reference to our economy. Now, he states that he was referring to the American workers as being the backbone of our economy? This reference is only made after Obama has contested his refusal to accept that our country is in a financial crisis. Maybe this is McCain’s way of defusing his stance of denial.
4) McCain has stated since the beginning of the Republican campaign that he will fight a good and honest campaign without resorting to dirty politics of using smear tactics. Now, most of the McCain’s campaign ads against Obama are smear campaigns that even The New York Times, The Washington Post, The LA Times, Newsweek, and various other major news agencies have declared as false information using very dirty politics. Most of the Obama’s campaign ads have been on the defense to all of these false accusations by the McCain’s campaign ads.
5) For more changes of McCain, please look at the link below —

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops

In this election, there are in fact two forms of changes. One form of “Change” is being promoted by a candidate who wants to transform this country for the better, while the other form of “Change” is being promoted by another candidate of his own transformation to capture the hearts of the American public. Which form of “Change” do we want as a country?

Again: Please defend why Zerobama’s Chicago Machine “experience” qualifies him for “better financial leadership” than McCain.

There you have it: republicans and democrats don’t solve problems. So let’s pick one with the best vision and leadership.

Have a good day.

http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2008/09/nytimes-in-2003-bush-proposed.html

EXCERPT:

“Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

”I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,” Mr. Watt said.”