<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington&#8217;s One-Sided Gay War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:39:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Real Gay Self-Hatred</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-67833</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Real Gay Self-Hatred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-67833</guid>
		<description>[...] support. He never explained why he finds us &#8220;self-loathing.&#8221; None of them do, but they hurl the insult so readily as if by rote. But, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] support. He never explained why he finds us &#8220;self-loathing.&#8221; None of them do, but they hurl the insult so readily as if by rote. But, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gay magazine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-46725</link>
		<dc:creator>gay magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-46725</guid>
		<description>[...] of a gay equivalent of Vanity Fair referencing ???an ancient hypocrisy at the heart of the GOP.???http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/List of LGBT publications - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaGCN Gay Community News NLGF Registered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of a gay equivalent of Vanity Fair referencing ???an ancient hypocrisy at the heart of the GOP.???http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/List of LGBT publications &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaGCN Gay Community News NLGF Registered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-38601</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-38601</guid>
		<description>It is too late for America as was Pompeii.In 1973 the
Supreme Court allowed Abortion now in the Millions.We
will never know if they were Homo or Hetero.But any nation that kills it&quot;s own comes under great Judgement.In the Book of Romans we will find out who
is not going to Heaven and Homosexuals whether in
civil unions or not are going to Hell they will be in charge of the fire with the fornicators and adulterers.The fact is that the facts are not discussed by the liberal media because they know there fate if they in fact are quilty.It used to be we could tell the
difference between democrats and republicans but this has
alarmingly is closer each day.Our nation was founded
on Christian Principles but not any-more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is too late for America as was Pompeii.In 1973 the<br />
Supreme Court allowed Abortion now in the Millions.We<br />
will never know if they were Homo or Hetero.But any nation that kills it&#8221;s own comes under great Judgement.In the Book of Romans we will find out who<br />
is not going to Heaven and Homosexuals whether in<br />
civil unions or not are going to Hell they will be in charge of the fire with the fornicators and adulterers.The fact is that the facts are not discussed by the liberal media because they know there fate if they in fact are quilty.It used to be we could tell the<br />
difference between democrats and republicans but this has<br />
alarmingly is closer each day.Our nation was founded<br />
on Christian Principles but not any-more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-36451</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-36451</guid>
		<description>Yes, but I come from Malaysia, and neither beer nor bikini-clad girls are advertised (or used to advertise) on TV. :)

So, like I said, it&#039;s time to put up or shut up, you know? There&#039;s plenty of hypocritical nonsense anywhere you look, and while there&#039;s a whole lot more of it on the left side, Javelin has a (very small, but nonetheless) point in that there are *some* righties who out and out hate gays (and shouldn&#039;t the gays examine why? It&#039;s not as if &#039;I&#039; hate &#039;you&#039; because &#039;I&#039;m&#039; afraid &#039;you&#039;ll&#039; turn &#039;me&#039; gay, it&#039;s more like because &#039;you&#039; disgust &#039;me&#039; and &#039;you&#039; get way too much in &#039;my&#039; face and so when &#039;you&#039; do that &#039;I&#039; want to punch &#039;your&#039; lights out). Of course, those who *really* hate gays are Islamists, who basically will stone and hang you for gay actions (but that&#039;s threadjacking and I don&#039;t swing that way).

Best thing - get rid of the sexualisation of *everything* It&#039;s (life, I mean) not all about appendage slotting into orifice. Mind you, I&#039;m not advocating new laws to do this cleanup - just that IMHO, the community could do with some of it.

Javelin: A bit of projection there, I daresay. But why would I want to break your little fantasy? Would be like herding ferrets.

I will be the first to admit that pornography is a blight on culture. And individuals. Not excepting ANYBODY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but I come from Malaysia, and neither beer nor bikini-clad girls are advertised (or used to advertise) on TV. <img src='http://pajamasmedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, like I said, it&#8217;s time to put up or shut up, you know? There&#8217;s plenty of hypocritical nonsense anywhere you look, and while there&#8217;s a whole lot more of it on the left side, Javelin has a (very small, but nonetheless) point in that there are *some* righties who out and out hate gays (and shouldn&#8217;t the gays examine why? It&#8217;s not as if &#8216;I&#8217; hate &#8216;you&#8217; because &#8216;I&#8217;m&#8217; afraid &#8216;you&#8217;ll&#8217; turn &#8216;me&#8217; gay, it&#8217;s more like because &#8216;you&#8217; disgust &#8216;me&#8217; and &#8216;you&#8217; get way too much in &#8216;my&#8217; face and so when &#8216;you&#8217; do that &#8216;I&#8217; want to punch &#8216;your&#8217; lights out). Of course, those who *really* hate gays are Islamists, who basically will stone and hang you for gay actions (but that&#8217;s threadjacking and I don&#8217;t swing that way).</p>
<p>Best thing &#8211; get rid of the sexualisation of *everything* It&#8217;s (life, I mean) not all about appendage slotting into orifice. Mind you, I&#8217;m not advocating new laws to do this cleanup &#8211; just that IMHO, the community could do with some of it.</p>
<p>Javelin: A bit of projection there, I daresay. But why would I want to break your little fantasy? Would be like herding ferrets.</p>
<p>I will be the first to admit that pornography is a blight on culture. And individuals. Not excepting ANYBODY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-36316</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-36316</guid>
		<description>&quot;...No using girls in bikinis to sell cars. Or beers, for that matter.&quot;

Gregory! This is the United States you&#039;re talking about!

I&#039;m a wicked homosexual, and even I know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;No using girls in bikinis to sell cars. Or beers, for that matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gregory! This is the United States you&#8217;re talking about!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a wicked homosexual, and even I know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javelin</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-36314</link>
		<dc:creator>Javelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-36314</guid>
		<description>When people call their opponents fascists, it means nothing. Fascism as a word lost meaning decades ago, but  since Jonah cranked out his partisan screed, all the poor oppressed cons have been babbling about liberal fascists, as if the &quot;Politics of Meaning&quot; was anything more than an empty label.
 You can posture all you want about being anti-homosexuality but not anti-homosexual or loving the sinner but hating the sin, the fact is a good chunk of the GOP and cons in gerneral hate gays. Does this make them fascists, no, it just means they hate gays. How many times have I heard cons ridicule Andrew Sullivan about his gayness, demean Nancy Pelosi for attending a gay pride parade or call into Alan Colmes and scream some banal juvenile queer baiting remark, I have lost track. But hating gays is acceptable amongst many cons, and please don&#039;t ridcule and insult me for pointing out this fact. This is part of their ignorant, John Wayne movie fantasy warrior culture and despising anything that isn&#039;t as tough as the some brutal Marine they imagine they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people call their opponents fascists, it means nothing. Fascism as a word lost meaning decades ago, but  since Jonah cranked out his partisan screed, all the poor oppressed cons have been babbling about liberal fascists, as if the &#8220;Politics of Meaning&#8221; was anything more than an empty label.<br />
 You can posture all you want about being anti-homosexuality but not anti-homosexual or loving the sinner but hating the sin, the fact is a good chunk of the GOP and cons in gerneral hate gays. Does this make them fascists, no, it just means they hate gays. How many times have I heard cons ridicule Andrew Sullivan about his gayness, demean Nancy Pelosi for attending a gay pride parade or call into Alan Colmes and scream some banal juvenile queer baiting remark, I have lost track. But hating gays is acceptable amongst many cons, and please don&#8217;t ridcule and insult me for pointing out this fact. This is part of their ignorant, John Wayne movie fantasy warrior culture and despising anything that isn&#8217;t as tough as the some brutal Marine they imagine they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-35922</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-35922</guid>
		<description>Curious. Mr Blatt, not trying to hijack your blogpost, so feel free to edit as required.

If homosexuality is something O.K. (even if a large number of religiously conservative, not necessarily Christian folk think otherwise) and they should be loved (I agree that they should be shown &#039;agape&#039; love, yes), then why should not those who disagree be shown the same &#039;love&#039;? If I disapprove of homosexuality, and someone disapproves of my disapproval, shouldn&#039;t we be shown the same leeway, the same considerations? Notwithstanding &#039;moral equivalence&#039;, of course.

However, this is not the case. I am not anti-homosexual, just anti-homosexuality. Two different positions, no pun intended. And yet I find that the very same people &#039;preaching&#039; diversity and tolerance do not tolerate my stance. Indeed curious.

Mr Blatt points out the obvious; the so-called &#039;gay agenda&#039; is nothing of the sort, having (like so many other well-intentioned movements) been hijacked by people hell-bent on politicising it to death. Why this is not obvious to so many others is quite beyond my understanding.

My personal stance; get rid of ALL sexual innuendo in our public space. Let sexual matters recede to the private arena, where most people will agree they belong. No more blatant gay pride marches, BDSM fairs and festivals, Planned Promiscuity events. No using girls in bikinis to sell cars. Or beers, for that matter.

About choice: funny thing, though. Why do people choose alcohol? Or hard drugs? Or adultery? Because it makes them feel good for a while before dropping them into misery? No? Yet it starts with a chice - Yes or No.

You cannot say that people will always choose the &#039;right&#039; path, or that if you do something that does not seem rational, it MUST be because you can&#039;t help it, because obviously you would NEVER choose to do it. Lots of people make stupid choices and decisions all the time. Every now and then, with dire consequences.

Anyways, back to your scheduled programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious. Mr Blatt, not trying to hijack your blogpost, so feel free to edit as required.</p>
<p>If homosexuality is something O.K. (even if a large number of religiously conservative, not necessarily Christian folk think otherwise) and they should be loved (I agree that they should be shown &#8216;agape&#8217; love, yes), then why should not those who disagree be shown the same &#8216;love&#8217;? If I disapprove of homosexuality, and someone disapproves of my disapproval, shouldn&#8217;t we be shown the same leeway, the same considerations? Notwithstanding &#8216;moral equivalence&#8217;, of course.</p>
<p>However, this is not the case. I am not anti-homosexual, just anti-homosexuality. Two different positions, no pun intended. And yet I find that the very same people &#8216;preaching&#8217; diversity and tolerance do not tolerate my stance. Indeed curious.</p>
<p>Mr Blatt points out the obvious; the so-called &#8216;gay agenda&#8217; is nothing of the sort, having (like so many other well-intentioned movements) been hijacked by people hell-bent on politicising it to death. Why this is not obvious to so many others is quite beyond my understanding.</p>
<p>My personal stance; get rid of ALL sexual innuendo in our public space. Let sexual matters recede to the private arena, where most people will agree they belong. No more blatant gay pride marches, BDSM fairs and festivals, Planned Promiscuity events. No using girls in bikinis to sell cars. Or beers, for that matter.</p>
<p>About choice: funny thing, though. Why do people choose alcohol? Or hard drugs? Or adultery? Because it makes them feel good for a while before dropping them into misery? No? Yet it starts with a chice &#8211; Yes or No.</p>
<p>You cannot say that people will always choose the &#8216;right&#8217; path, or that if you do something that does not seem rational, it MUST be because you can&#8217;t help it, because obviously you would NEVER choose to do it. Lots of people make stupid choices and decisions all the time. Every now and then, with dire consequences.</p>
<p>Anyways, back to your scheduled programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berevi</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-35092</link>
		<dc:creator>Berevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-35092</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that around us, from children to the old, we are surrounded by gays.  These our friends, our loved ones, our children.  We know many truly good people who just want to be loved, and free to love.  How can we hate our friends, loved ones, our children?  It is the truth of human existence that we fear what we don&#039;t understand.  They are gay.  It is O.K.  Why would they CHOOSE something they fear will make those THEY love, hate or abandon them?  Just because some religious rambling says so?    We must follow our hearts, our souls.  Love our people.  ALL our people.  It is so very important we do so.  Or we will never be one as a people.  Stop your child fearing you.  Let them be the only thing they feel they can.  Show them how to love themselves and to love in life honorably, with caring, and instill in them the future.  This world is so many, with many voices screaming to be heard, when all these people want is love.  Let them love, give them that right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that around us, from children to the old, we are surrounded by gays.  These our friends, our loved ones, our children.  We know many truly good people who just want to be loved, and free to love.  How can we hate our friends, loved ones, our children?  It is the truth of human existence that we fear what we don&#8217;t understand.  They are gay.  It is O.K.  Why would they CHOOSE something they fear will make those THEY love, hate or abandon them?  Just because some religious rambling says so?    We must follow our hearts, our souls.  Love our people.  ALL our people.  It is so very important we do so.  Or we will never be one as a people.  Stop your child fearing you.  Let them be the only thing they feel they can.  Show them how to love themselves and to love in life honorably, with caring, and instill in them the future.  This world is so many, with many voices screaming to be heard, when all these people want is love.  Let them love, give them that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-35056</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-35056</guid>
		<description>If you believe in freedom of race, religion, and sexuality from government intervention, then technically you&#039;re politically conservative.  Make a law to make infringing on ones rights to get a job, a loan, a home, ect, and enforce the law-end of story.  It&#039;s the liberals that are into exploitation and perversion of one&#039;s rights and perception of how one should live &#039;properly&#039; by their standards.  

If you are obsessed with people of any sexuality&#039;s behavior behind closed doors, it’s your own personal issue, either mind your own business or explore what you are [i]apparently[/i] interested in, just like anything else in life.  Not sure why when referring to someone being &#039;gay&#039; it immediately means the sexual act and nothing else.  People who are ‘hetero’ in a relationship surely don’t add up only the sexual moments it’s a state of mind-a lifestyle, not a sex act.  There are plenty of gay celibate people in this world .  I am personally heterosexual, but if I were curious about it I would simply pursue it like any other ‘desire’ that I have that does not hurt anyone, and not care what anyone else thinks about it.  If you think someone elses’ preferences have anything to do with your life, it is YOU that has the issue.

Liberal/socialism is the anti-freedom, although they wrap it up in such a pretty package people get a little confused sometimes(about 99% of self-proclaimed liberals, actually)….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe in freedom of race, religion, and sexuality from government intervention, then technically you&#8217;re politically conservative.  Make a law to make infringing on ones rights to get a job, a loan, a home, ect, and enforce the law-end of story.  It&#8217;s the liberals that are into exploitation and perversion of one&#8217;s rights and perception of how one should live &#8216;properly&#8217; by their standards.  </p>
<p>If you are obsessed with people of any sexuality&#8217;s behavior behind closed doors, it’s your own personal issue, either mind your own business or explore what you are [i]apparently[/i] interested in, just like anything else in life.  Not sure why when referring to someone being &#8216;gay&#8217; it immediately means the sexual act and nothing else.  People who are ‘hetero’ in a relationship surely don’t add up only the sexual moments it’s a state of mind-a lifestyle, not a sex act.  There are plenty of gay celibate people in this world .  I am personally heterosexual, but if I were curious about it I would simply pursue it like any other ‘desire’ that I have that does not hurt anyone, and not care what anyone else thinks about it.  If you think someone elses’ preferences have anything to do with your life, it is YOU that has the issue.</p>
<p>Liberal/socialism is the anti-freedom, although they wrap it up in such a pretty package people get a little confused sometimes(about 99% of self-proclaimed liberals, actually)….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Julie Kept me up all Night</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/comment-page-1/#comment-35046</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Julie Kept me up all Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/washingtons-one-sided-gay-war/#comment-35046</guid>
		<description>[...] recently concluded, wrote that out (posting it later today) and then discovered Pajamas had posted my piece on Out&#8217;s one-sided coverage of Washington&#8217;s gay wars, so was eager to update the blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently concluded, wrote that out (posting it later today) and then discovered Pajamas had posted my piece on Out&#8217;s one-sided coverage of Washington&#8217;s gay wars, so was eager to update the blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
