What 60 Minutes Didn’t Tell You About Murat Kurnaz
Murat Kurnaz was portrayed as an unjustly imprisoned man in a recent CBS report — when there is ample evidence linking the former Guantánamo inmate to terrorism.
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
“At the age of 19, Murat Kurnaz vanished into America’s shadow prison system in the war on terror. He was from Germany, traveling in Pakistan, and was picked up three months after 9/11. But there seemed to be ample evidence that Kurnaz was an innocent man with no connection to terrorism. The FBI thought so, U.S. intelligence thought so, and German intelligence agreed.” Thus intoned CBS correspondent Scott Pelley on Sunday night in introducing the 60 Minutes report on former Guantánamo inmate and book author Murat Kurnaz. Now, it is already something of a logical feat to assemble “ample evidence” for a purely negative proposition. But leaving this peculiarity aside, the principal problem with CBS’s claim is that there is, on the contrary, ample evidence that Kurnaz was indeed connected to terrorist circles and had left Germany to fight with the Taliban, just as US authorities have maintained.
Whatever doubts individual US investigators may or may not have expressed — and the CBS claims in this connection are not verifiable since they are based on a supposedly “secret file” cited by Kurnaz’s lawyers — we know from Kurnaz’s declassified Combatant Status Review file that US authorities have in fact upheld his original classification as an illegal enemy combatant. More to the point, far from “agreeing” that Kurnaz had no connection to terror, starting in 2002, Germany’s Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations (BKA) — the German equivalent of the FBI — itself classified Kurnaz as a “security risk.” This classification was based on a number of pieces of information linking Kurnaz to Islamic extremist circles in Germany, including to the milieu of the “Hamburg cell” that planned the 9/11 attacks.
It was precisely on account of this evidence and the resulting classification of Kurnaz as a “security risk” that the “red-green” German government of former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder was reluctant to have Kurnaz returned to Germany. Despite his having been born in Bremen, moreover, Kurnaz is not a German citizen. This fact undoubtedly contributed to Germany’s indifference to his fate. Kurnaz is a Turkish citizen, and the Schröder government appears to have considered him to be Turkey’s problem.
In March of last year, Bernhard Falk, the Deputy Director of the BKA, testified before a German parliamentary committee on the contents of the German police file on Murat Kurnaz. The full contents of the file have not been made public. But committee member Thomas Oppermann published a summary of the evidence [German link] supporting Kurnaz’s classification as a “security risk.” The Oppermann summary of the BKA file provides a highly instructive counterpoint to the CBS report.
*
60 Minutes:
The 60 Minutes report unquestioningly repeats Kurnaz’s assertion that he left Germany for Pakistan on October 3, 2001, just three weeks after the 9/11 attacks, in order to “study Islam” — i.e. not in order to join in the Taliban defense against the impending American invasion of Afghanistan. Pelley notes blandly that in Bremen Kurnaz “met Islamic missionaries who urged him to go to Pakistan for study.” We are not told anything more about just who these “Islamic missionaries” might have been.
The German BKA File:
According to the BKA, Kurnaz was, more specifically, attending the sermons of one Ali Miri at the Abu-Bakr Mosque in Bremen. Employing common German police nomenclature for Islamic extremist imams, the Oppermann summary describes Miri as a “preacher of hate” [Hassprediger]. Oppermann notes, moreover, that according to statements made by Kurnaz’s mother, Rabiye, to the Bremen police, Kurnaz had been “brainwashed” by Miri. It should be noted here — as it is not in the CBS report — that Kurnaz left for Pakistan without informing his family. On October 5, Rabiye Kurnaz reported his disappearance to the Bremen police. In her statement to the police, she clearly expressed her suspicion that her son had gone to fight with the Taliban, having been encouraged by Ali Miri to do so. In excerpts from Rabiye Kurnaz’s October 5, 2001 deposition to the Bremen police published in the German tabloid Bild, she describes confronting Miri about her son’s disappearance: “I told him that he wanted to help the Taliban after all, that he had completely brainwashed Murat.”
60 Minutes:
Concerning Kurnaz’s reactions to the 9/11 attacks, Pelley notes, “He told 60 Minutes he was horrified by the attacks, and had never heard of Al-Qaeda.”
The German BKA File:
In the Oppermann summary of the BKA file, we read: “Independently of one another, two direct witnesses have declared to the Bremen police that Kurnaz approved of the September 11 terrorist attacks, describing them as ‘God’s will.’”
60 Minutes:
CBS cites Kurnaz’s American lawyer, Baher Azmy, to the effect that “the military seemed to have invented some of the charges [against Kurnaz]”: “Military prosecutors said one of Kurnaz’s friends was a suicide bomber, but the friend turned up alive and well in Germany.” As we hear this, we see a declassified US government document appear briefly on the screen. Although CBS does not deign to inform its viewers, the document is the 2004 Combatant Status Review Tribunal decision that upheld Kurnaz’s classification as an illegal enemy combatant. (The decision can be consulted in full here.) As the CBS camera zooms in, the name of the “friend” in question can be seen on the page: Selcuk Bilgin. The CBS report tells us nothing further about Selcuk Bilgin.
The German BKA File:
As so happens, when Murat Kurnaz left Germany for Pakistan on October 3, 2001, he was supposed to be accompanied by Selcuk Bilgin. German police, however, arrested Bilgin at the airport before he could board his flight. Here is what the Oppermann summary of the BKA file has to say on the subject of Selcuk Bilgin:
On October 3, 2001, the brother of Selcuk Bilgin notified the Federal Police [responsible for border security in Germany] that Selcuk “is following a friend to Afghanistan, in order to fight.” His later attempts to relativize this declaration have been dismissed as not credible by the police. The wife of Bilgin, moreover, has confirmed to Kurnaz’s mother that Bilgin and Kurnaz wanted to go to Afghanistan.
Bilgin was arrested at the airport and thus prevented from embarking on his voyage with Kurnaz. Later, in 2003, the police determined that he was continuing to try to recruit young, inexperienced Muslims for Jihad at the Abu-Bakr Mosque. Thus Ali T., who on April 25, 2003 hijacked a bus in Bremen, stated to the police that Bilgin had awakened in him the desire to become a Mujahideen through conversations and prayers and by showing him propaganda videos. According to Ali T., Bilgin promised that he would have him trained as a fighter in Pakistan or Afghanistan, just as he had done in the past with Murat Kurnaz. The training, Bilgin is reported to have said, would be financed by Al-Qaeda.
American military investigators appear indeed to have mistakenly identified Selcuk Bilgin as the perpetrator of a suicide attack that was carried out in Turkey — a point that hardly inspires confidence in their abilities. And Selcuk Bilgin is indeed alive and well in Germany. But that Kurnaz was leaving Germany in the company of Bilgin remains the single most compelling piece of evidence indicating that Kurnaz was leaving to fight with the Taliban in Afghanistan — and not to “study Islam” in Pakistan.
60 Minutes:
Citing Kurnaz’s German lawyer, Bernhard Docke, the 60 Minutes report suggests that German police suspicions about Kurnaz were merely a product of post-9/11 hysteria. “It was just guessing, just fear, no more. But the fear turns into a fact,” Docke says. And he continues: “And so close after 9/11, and close after Germany realized that 9/11 started with the Hamburg cell in Germany, everybody in the secret services got crazy.”
The German BKA File:
In fact, the most explosive revelation of the BKA file is that Murat Kurnaz had direct contact to the milieu of the Hamburg cell. Astonishingly, Pelley — unlike Docke — appears to downplay the significance of the Hamburg cell, saying merely that “some of the [9/11] hijackers had been living in Hamburg.” In fact, the Hamburg cell was largely responsible for the conception and implementation of the 9/11 plot. It included not only three of the four hijacking team leaders — Mohammad Atta, Ziad Jarrah, and Marwan Al-Shehhi — but also Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh. Slotted to lead the fourth hijacking team, but refused entry to the United States, Bin Al-Shibh would continue to provide logistical support for the attacks from Germany. Murat Kurnaz’s and Selcuk Bilgin’s plane tickets to Pakistan were paid for by one Sofyen Ben Amor, who in conversation with Ali Miri is supposed to have identified himself as a “Taliban.” Here is what the Oppermann summary of the BKA file has to say further on the subject of Sofyen Ben Amor:
According to police investigations, there are numerous links between the Taliban Sofyen Ben Amor, who purchased Kurnaz’s plane tickets, and the “Hamburg cell.” Thus, for example, Ben Amor’s telephone number was found in an address book that was seized during a Hamburg raid carried out as part of the Federal District Attorney’s investigation of, among others, Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh in connection with the attacks of September 11, 2001.
The police have determined, moreover, that up until September 11, 2001, Sofyen Ben Amor frequently withdrew money in the vicinity of the Al-Quds Mosque in Hamburg. It was at this mosque that the “Hamburg cell” formed around Mohammad Atta.
*
Tantalizingly, the Oppermann summary concludes with the following observation: “Finally, there are also numerous pieces of evidence in the file that indicate that Ben Amor, Bilgin, and Kurnaz have links to Mohammad Haydar Zammar, one of the most important recruiters of the ‘Hamburg cell.’”
It would obviously help to defuse much of the pathos provoked by tendentious and misleading reporting on the Kurnaz case — of which the 60 Minutes report is a prime example — if the German government would release this evidence, as well as all the BKA evidence linking Kurnaz to the Hamburg cell and pro-Taliban circles in Germany.
(A full translation of Thomas Oppermann’s summary of the BKA file on Murat Kurnaz is available here on World Politics Review.)
John Rosenthal is Translations Editor and a contributing editor for World Politics Review.
| Comment | Digg This |
del.icio.us |
![]() |
![]() |
PJM Home |


Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home


19 Comments
Redball6:Aaah, just so typical of the conspiracy Broadcast Network. Hey CBS wile you check your ratings also check you six!
Apr 1, 2008 - 11:57 pm Dark Helmet:60 minutes hour is up. It’s a shame really that they couldn’t bow out with honor.
God bless America.
Apr 2, 2008 - 6:58 am Paul:I can hardly wait for the correction to appear in next Sunday’s 60 Minutes. On second thought, I’d better not hold my breath!
Apr 2, 2008 - 9:35 am ronnor:If they have no news they invent it. Having real investigative reporters is very expensive, why go to that cash ourlay when you can just make up things and sell the ad space anyway. The people who still watch 60 minutes have had their brains ooze out of their ear holes a long time ago and they have become the denizens of the great “waste land” that Edward R. Morrow used to speak of. Its selling the air time which is important, forget about the truth as that is a secondary consideration, ask the experts Dan Rather and Mary Mapes; they know.
Apr 2, 2008 - 10:10 am Jimbob:I’m sorry, where is the evidence he’s done anything? You have saying he hates America, and that hes a security risk, but you really don’t have “ample evidence” he ever did anything. Sympathizing with radical Islam, traveling to Pakistan, no hard evidence at all eh? Have you a single shred of proof that this man ever DID anything? If every bit of evidence regarding this man pointed to the KKK, or any other violent-but-not-in-the-news group, you wouldn’t care.
Apr 2, 2008 - 11:22 am sal m:it’s really no wonder that CBS languishes in last place and is laying off many of their “journalists” as we speak. 60 Minutes is worse than any tabloid newspaper and doesn’t even have the ratings to justify its existance.
Apr 2, 2008 - 11:33 am Andrew:Nothing in this article says that CBS manufactured evidence, just that it downplayed parts. The article does however admit that the security forces investigating this guy did make mistakes. Why don’t you guys get upset when Fox News leaves out facts on just about every news story. The Iraq war, global warming, NSA spying, etc. etc. etc.
Apr 2, 2008 - 11:50 am Huh?:Andrew and Jimbob,
Nice comments. They prove you have no idea about what the news really is. Andrew, when did “consensus” equal “science”? Only when it is part of global warming. When did the NSA spy on Americans? Never. How many times did the NSA prevent further terrorist issues since 2001? 18 that we know of.
And the poor KKK strawman from Jimbob? Name one instance where the GOP kept someone who was friendly to, or part of this organization. Next, name someone who made a slightly off-color comment and was allowed to stay. I mean really, come on. Trent Lott was booted for something similar. Yet you have Robert Byrd, a card-carrying member of the KKK who still serves DNC interests in the Senate today.
You don’t want to start on what the mainstream media leaves out in their reporting. That is a battle you will lose. It’s not like this is the first time CBS has made up stuff and gotten in trouble over it. Dan Rather, GM and others can tell you all about it.
Apr 2, 2008 - 1:31 pm Saltherring:Andrew: What are the “facts” of global warming? GW is no more than a cult of research “scientists” conspiring to loot the public treasury for their wet-dream laboratory projects.
And Kurnaz? We should release all the sub-humans at Gitmo, herd them to the water’s edge at gunpoint and order them to walk home. Sharks need to eat too.
Apr 3, 2008 - 6:16 am Andrew:You guys just show how backwards conservatives can be. Instead of diagnosing future problems and trying to prevent them you are 100% reactionary. It won’t be long before we get some leaders who will put America back in front with regards to science, morality and equal rights. And when that happens just know there won’t be a R next to those leaders names.
Apr 3, 2008 - 8:07 am George Bush:What? you mean…The media is against the war?? No…..
Apr 3, 2008 - 8:45 am Jimbob:Thats because they are run be liberals who want to run from the war with our tail between our legs, so we can have abother 9/11.
Forget all the troops that gave there life, forget those who died 9/11, because we have been there five years, and we need to stop spending money. Because to liberals, thats what its all about.
After all, we need the troops back over here planting some trees.
This is great. The ultimate republican response: “liberals who want to run from the war with our tail between our legs, so we can have abother 9/11.”
A post with more grammatical errors than teeth, from a guy pretending to be an even bigger idiot than the man himself.
My only comment about the article is it vilifies a man and (same as CBS) offers a circumstantial case. Theres no evidence to convict this man of anything, and there is no evidence to say he’s completely innocent. usually in these situation we let the guy go.
Better not have nother 911, wait, we lost more US soldiers in Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 911, than we did IN 911. well that makes sense.
Apr 3, 2008 - 12:57 pm mw:John,
Apr 3, 2008 - 4:12 pm Dark Helmet:Exactly what is the point of this article? Are you really saying that it is perfectly acceptable to keep a man incarcerated for five years, subject him to “enhanced interrogation” (or whatever euphemism for torture that you prefer), without any legal recourse, and without an ability to face his accusers or see the evidence against him? Because the point of the 60 Minute story is - That should not happen in America. Apparently you think it is perfectly acceptable. The story was not about whether there was evidence of him having an association with terrorists. The story is about whether we want our country to be able to hold and torture anyone without having to produce evidence for their incarceration, but simply on a secret suspicion. I’d like to hear clearly from the critics of the 60 minutes piece if they think this is what America should be.
mw: The irs has been doing it for many many years,
Apr 4, 2008 - 12:02 am Huh?:Hey Jimbob,
You responded to GB, where’s my response? Too tough for you? Hard to face facts?
Also, did you know that the Hussein government was found to be liable for 9/11 and ordered to pay survivors money? True story - ordered to pay millions from an NYC judge who looked at the evidence of Hussein, previous terror links, and AQ. You can look at http://www.husseinandterror.com for more details. Don’t be scared though, it’s just your incorrect worldview that will suffer.
And Andrew. Reactionary? To what? In the 70s these same people claimed we were facing another ice age. Now, it’s global warming. As I said before, consensus is not science. Proving or disproving the hypothesis is science. Ask the guy who helped to was part of the IPCC study for the UN, and wouldn’t accept the Nobel Prize because of this same reason. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119387567378878423.html) Or perhaps you just believe this is the fault of men, due to another “scientific” study (http://www.bloggernews.net/114888)
It helps to have correct information as well. Did you know that James Hansen’s research, that he and Al Gore have based so much on, was incorrect? Did you think to look? Did you also know that the mean temperature of Mars has increased about the same amount that the Earth’s temperature has increased? What proactive solution do you prescribe for this? I am not aware of a large number of SUVs on Mars. Is the cure to global warming Priuses (which don’t get too much better mileage than a Corolla, but cause much more environmental damage) or CFLs for your light fixtures (which are extremely hazardous to the environment due to the amount of mercury)? Do you think that throwing some “solutions” at an unknown or unverified “problem” will help or cause more problems? Simply having an emotional response to something and getting on the consensus bandwagon is not enough to justify the reaction you are wishing on the population. For heaven’s sake, scientists can’t predict the weather into the next 14 days, let alone the next 100 years.
And MW, yes, it is acceptable to keep this person locked up in Guatanamo for five years as a terrorist. I don’t recall Americans flying the planes into buildings on 9/11, but terrorists. Some of those terrorists are being held there. They get fed better than our troops guarding them, they have religious freedom, they can see lawyers, etc., etc. They are treated much better than any other POW in history by any other country. Did you get this worked up about POWs in Hanoi and Bataan, who had, without argument, much, much worse experiences? You need to stay away from movies like Rendition as your points of fact.
My .02. Please feel free to reply with reasoned and well-thought out responses.
Apr 4, 2008 - 9:45 am david still:If 60 Minutes and the German govt are wrong, then why did the American govt and its courts let him go???
what a silly piece of nonsense in this post
Apr 4, 2008 - 1:22 pm Huh?:Good question, David. We know they’ve let others go who have later been caught again or killed on the battlefield. Should have kept him locked up.
Apr 7, 2008 - 10:04 am